• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Back Off On Testing

A

Anonymous

Guest
Sandbag: "I don't remember Canada threatening any trade sanctions if they didn't change their laws exclusively for Canada. Canada used a little bit of tact and respect, the US did nothing of the sort."

I'll take that as an admission that Japan will accept untested beef without being "BULLIED".

Which totally defeats your previous argument that the only reason Japan accepted untested beef from the US was because we "BULLIED" them.

Great job contradicting your previous argument. LOL!


~SH~
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
~SH~ said:
Sandbag: "I don't remember Canada threatening any trade sanctions if they didn't change their laws exclusively for Canada. Canada used a little bit of tact and respect, the US did nothing of the sort."

I'll take that as an admission that Japan will accept untested beef without being "BULLIED".

Which totally defeats your previous argument that the only reason Japan accepted untested beef from the US was because we "BULLIED" them.

Great job contradicting your previous argument. LOL!


~SH~

Canada didn't bully and is shipping beef as we speak. We bullied and haven't shipped for months now.

I'll take your previous post as admission you have the common sense of a post.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Sandbag: "Canada didn't bully and is shipping beef as we speak."

Canada is shipping untested beef proving that Japan is not requesting bse tested beef as you "CLAIMED".

Yet another of your never ending worthless arguments buried by the facts.


Sandbag: "We bullied and haven't shipped for months now."

We aren't currently shipping to Japan because a small packer sent "BONE IN" product which has nothing to do with "TESTING" or "BULLYING".

Yet another of your never ending worthless arguments buried by the facts.


~SH~
 

Econ101

Well-known member
SH, You do a good job arguing the cattleman out of markets the packers don't want them in.

I wish you would argue for the producers instead of the packers. Your arguments might make sense then and neighbors might like you more.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Conman: "SH, You do a good job arguing the cattleman out of markets the packers don't want them in.

I wish you would argue for the producers instead of the packers. Your arguments might make sense then and neighbors might like you more."

What markets do the packers not want us in?

Watch the circus chicken dance around that question folks ...................


It was R-CULT and their packer blaming clones that took the position in a court of law that having BSE in your native herd means your beef is "HIGH RISK" and "CONTAMINATED".

In case you didn't know it, we had bse in our native herd after they took this stupid shortsighted position.

Do you believe our beef is "HIGH RISK" and "CONTAMINATED" due to having BSE in our native herd?

Yes or no?

Watch the circus chicken dance again folks............


Now lecture me on how my position is negatively impacting cattle prices.

R-CULT risked the integrity of 80% of our US beef consumption to stop the importation of 5% of our US beef consumption because they are too ignorant to realize that stopping Canadian imports will not remove Canadian beef from the world market.

R-CALF and their packer blaming and import blaming clones have done nothing but hurt this industry with their relentless lies and misinformation.



~SH~
 

Econ101

Well-known member
I don't believe in the integrity of the USDA anymore and I believe more testing rather than less is better.

I don't hide things under the rug, SH.
 

Latest posts

Top