• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Beck/Palin interview

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
For anybody that missed it last night, here's a link to watch online.

http://glennbeckclips.com/

For those that have been believing the left media about Sarah, I challenge you to watch it also, and let us know who you think is more trustworthy.
 

Tam

Well-known member
One thing about Sarah she is going to be the most vetted candidate in history if she chooses to run in 2012. The Leftwing media has turned over every rock and looked behind every tree in Alaska trying to find anything they can to destroy her. When that didn't work they started making crap up and attacking her family which I doubt they can do again and get away with it. They have had more fact checkers on her one book than they have in one whole year of Obama's Presidency. But what did they find, nothing. Now she has a media outlet to get her message out. You can bet the heads of the Leftwing Media were exploding after the Fox announcement. I saw her on O'Reilly and Beck where she held her own. O'Reilly even admitted he didn't hold back on his questions but felt she answered them straight up and honestly. When she was on Beck she said she would be happy to just go back to Wasilla and raise her family but if there is something she can do to make the Great country she loves so much better she is willing to try. I think that proved to Glenn she wasn't in it for the power some politicans seem to be seeking but to make a difference. I plan on watching her again tonight on Hannity.

Another thing that is going to set off the left is she planning to headline at a Tea Party. I hope this is just the first of many Tea Parties that she will be attending. GO SARAH.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Tam said:
One thing about Sarah she is going to be the most vetted candidate in history if she chooses to run in 2012. The Leftwing media has turned over every rock and looked behind every tree in Alaska trying to find anything they can to destroy her. When that didn't work they started making crap up and attacking her family which I doubt they can do again and get away with it. They have had more fact checkers on her one book than they have in one whole year of Obama's Presidency. But what did they find, nothing. Now she has a media outlet to get her message out. You can bet the heads of the Leftwing Media were exploding after the Fox announcement. I saw her on O'Reilly and Beck where she held her own. O'Reilly even admitted he didn't hold back on his questions but felt she answered them straight up and honestly. When she was on Beck she said she would be happy to just go back to Wasilla and raise her family but if there is something she can do to make the Great country she loves so much better she is willing to try. I think that proved to Glenn she wasn't in it for the power some politicans seem to be seeking but to make a difference. I plan on watching her again tonight on Hannity.

Another thing that is going to set off the left is she planning to headline at a Tea Party. I hope this is just the first of many Tea Parties that she will be attending. GO SARAH.[/quote



She is charging $75000 to talk to the tea party. Some of the tea party executives have resigned over it. Would you pay $375 to here her talk.
 

RobertMac

Well-known member
hurleyjd said:
Tam said:
One thing about Sarah she is going to be the most vetted candidate in history if she chooses to run in 2012. The Leftwing media has turned over every rock and looked behind every tree in Alaska trying to find anything they can to destroy her. When that didn't work they started making crap up and attacking her family which I doubt they can do again and get away with it. They have had more fact checkers on her one book than they have in one whole year of Obama's Presidency. But what did they find, nothing. Now she has a media outlet to get her message out. You can bet the heads of the Leftwing Media were exploding after the Fox announcement. I saw her on O'Reilly and Beck where she held her own. O'Reilly even admitted he didn't hold back on his questions but felt she answered them straight up and honestly. When she was on Beck she said she would be happy to just go back to Wasilla and raise her family but if there is something she can do to make the Great country she loves so much better she is willing to try. I think that proved to Glenn she wasn't in it for the power some politicans seem to be seeking but to make a difference. I plan on watching her again tonight on Hannity.

Another thing that is going to set off the left is she planning to headline at a Tea Party. I hope this is just the first of many Tea Parties that she will be attending. GO SARAH.[/quote



She is charging $75000 to talk to the tea party. Some of the tea party executives have resigned over it. Would you pay $375 to here her talk.
What's your source?
 

Tam

Well-known member
hurleyjd said:
Tam said:
One thing about Sarah she is going to be the most vetted candidate in history if she chooses to run in 2012. The Leftwing media has turned over every rock and looked behind every tree in Alaska trying to find anything they can to destroy her. When that didn't work they started making crap up and attacking her family which I doubt they can do again and get away with it. They have had more fact checkers on her one book than they have in one whole year of Obama's Presidency. But what did they find, nothing. Now she has a media outlet to get her message out. You can bet the heads of the Leftwing Media were exploding after the Fox announcement. I saw her on O'Reilly and Beck where she held her own. O'Reilly even admitted he didn't hold back on his questions but felt she answered them straight up and honestly. When she was on Beck she said she would be happy to just go back to Wasilla and raise her family but if there is something she can do to make the Great country she loves so much better she is willing to try. I think that proved to Glenn she wasn't in it for the power some politicans seem to be seeking but to make a difference. I plan on watching her again tonight on Hannity.

Another thing that is going to set off the left is she planning to headline at a Tea Party. I hope this is just the first of many Tea Parties that she will be attending. GO SARAH.[/quote



She is charging $75000 to talk to the tea party. Some of the tea party executives have resigned over it. Would you pay $375 to here her talk.

Gee that is funny O'Reilly interview

Sarah: I am so thankful for the Tea Party movement, for people having a place for their voice to be heard. I can't wait to do this event, and there are a lot of Tea Party events...

Bill: keynote, here right?

Sarah: I believe I am the keynote. There will be other speakers, too, though, but I can't wait to get to hear from those who are so concerned about our economy and about our national security issues and share with them what I believe the solutions are.

Bill: They'll love you at the Tea Party, boy. They will love you!

Sarah: Well, I can't wait to be there, and there's always that controversy it seems surrounding whatever it is that I announce I'm going to do. There's controversy involved in this one because the Tea Party offered me a speaking fee. I will not financially be gaining anything from this.

Bill : You should, though. You have a family to support. Take the money.

Sarah: You know what's more important? More important than money in my pocket from an event like that is being able to turn it right back around and contribute to campaigns, candidates and issues that will help our country.



They offered the fee and she will not financially be gaining anything from this. A bit different than your claim that she is CHARGING them :wink:
 

RobertMac

Well-known member
hurleyjd said:
She is charging $75000 to talk to the tea party. Some of the tea party executives have resigned over it. Would you pay $375 to here her talk.


...conference organizer Judson Phillips declined to discuss the fees.


“I know who your sources are. They are not reliable,” he said in response to an inquiry from POLITICO.



Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0110/31409.html#ixzz0ccq03dUi
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
$100,000 a speech, with a discount to $75,000 for West Coast appearances.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0110/31409.html#ixzz0cd1YJHhF

so $25,000 for travel, security and lodging etc? Sounds like Palin won't be gaining financially from this speech.

Wonder what Beck is charging to speak at CPAC?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
RobertMac said:
hurleyjd said:
Tam said:
One thing about Sarah she is going to be the most vetted candidate in history if she chooses to run in 2012. The Leftwing media has turned over every rock and looked behind every tree in Alaska trying to find anything they can to destroy her. When that didn't work they started making crap up and attacking her family which I doubt they can do again and get away with it. They have had more fact checkers on her one book than they have in one whole year of Obama's Presidency. But what did they find, nothing. Now she has a media outlet to get her message out. You can bet the heads of the Leftwing Media were exploding after the Fox announcement. I saw her on O'Reilly and Beck where she held her own. O'Reilly even admitted he didn't hold back on his questions but felt she answered them straight up and honestly. When she was on Beck she said she would be happy to just go back to Wasilla and raise her family but if there is something she can do to make the Great country she loves so much better she is willing to try. I think that proved to Glenn she wasn't in it for the power some politicans seem to be seeking but to make a difference. I plan on watching her again tonight on Hannity.

Another thing that is going to set off the left is she planning to headline at a Tea Party. I hope this is just the first of many Tea Parties that she will be attending. GO SARAH.[/quote



She is charging $75000 to talk to the tea party. Some of the tea party executives have resigned over it. Would you pay $375 to here her talk.
What's your source?

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1009/28873.html
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
RobertMac said:
hurleyjd said:
She is charging $75000 to talk to the tea party. Some of the tea party executives have resigned over it. Would you pay $375 to here her talk.


...conference organizer Judson Phillips declined to discuss the fees.


“I know who your sources are. They are not reliable,” he said in response to an inquiry from POLITICO.



Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0110/31409.html#ixzz0ccq03dUi

Robert here is the first place I read about the charging of the speaking fee..
Seems like there are some more out there trying to take advantage of the TEA party and its members. It takes money to do any thing, I realize that.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0110/31284.html
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
RobertMac said:
hurleyjd said:
She is charging $75000 to talk to the tea party. Some of the tea party executives have resigned over it. Would you pay $375 to here her talk.


...conference organizer Judson Phillips declined to discuss the fees.


“I know who your sources are. They are not reliable,” he said in response to an inquiry from POLITICO.



Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0110/31409.html#ixzz0ccq03dUi

Robert here is the first place I read about the charging of the speaking fee..
Seems like there are some more out there trying to take advantage of the TEA party and its members. It takes money to do any thing, I realize that.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0110/31284.html
 

RobertMac

Well-known member
Hurley, the thing in Nashville is a fund raiser...not unlike the multi-thousand $$$ a plate fund raisers Obama has done. The fact is that no one knows what she is getting paid to speak because those that would know aren't telling.

If you dig into your article, you will see she has gotten 1070 invitations to speak and, beings there are only 365 days in a year, that is what would be referred to as demand. Demand commands a premium.
 

TSR

Well-known member
Whether you like her or not, you still have to wonder if promises of such future speaking engagements and the money coming from them, didn't weigh heavily on her decision to quit as governor. :???:
 

Tam

Well-known member
TSR said:
Whether you like her or not, you still have to wonder if promises of such future speaking engagements and the money coming from them, didn't weigh heavily on her decision to quit as governor. :???:

From what she has told everyone that cares to listen to her, she left her Governors office because of the ethics lawsuits which I might remind you were all tossed out of court. She said they were costing Alaskans millions in legal fees and her office was getting nothing done because of them. She stepped down to save Alaska the money and so the State could get back to work. Now if these people that were hell bent on destroying her, and I think we all know who they were, would have been smart enough to see what their lawsuits were doing to Alaska, she might have been able to stay in her office.

The multiple lawsuits filed against her is a very good reason why the laws need to be changed so if you file and the case is tossed you pay ALL LEGAL COSTS. When you run up legal fees on an innocent person you should have to pay for your stupidity not the innocent person like Sarah had to. :x

BTW yes she had to leave to make money TO PAY HER LEGAL FEES.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Tam said:
TSR said:
Whether you like her or not, you still have to wonder if promises of such future speaking engagements and the money coming from them, didn't weigh heavily on her decision to quit as governor. :???:

From what she has told everyone that cares to listen to her, she left her Governors office because of the ethics lawsuits which I might remind you were all tossed out of court. She said they were costing Alaskans millions in legal fees and her office was getting nothing done because of them. She stepped down to save Alaska the money and so the State could get back to work. Now if these people that were hell bent on destroying her, and I think we all know who they were, would have been smart enough to see what their lawsuits were doing to Alaska, she might have been able to stay in her office.

The multiple lawsuits filed against her is a very good reason why the laws need to be changed so if you file and the case is tossed you pay ALL LEGAL COSTS. When you run up legal fees on an innocent person you should have to pay for your stupidity not the innocent person like Sarah had to. :x

BTW yes she had to leave to make money TO PAY HER LEGAL FEES.

Tam you are singing to the choir. These folks know all that you have posted. They are looking for a whopping child plain and simple.

Not one from he left even the brazen ot has the guts character or will to stand u to the true threat to this country and its People.

Oops sorry ot has the guts but not the character it takes to call an ace a ace and Spade a Spade. :cry:

When GW was in office many from the right posted the things GW did wrong.

Sad thing is the left does not mention good or bad omahma is doing rather they try and throw up smoke screens plain and simple.
 

hopalong

Well-known member
TSR said:
Whether you like her or not, you still have to wonder if promises of such future speaking engagements and the money coming from them, didn't weigh heavily on her decision to quit as governor. :???:

One also has to wonder just how many speaking engagements were offered her before her resignation?????
One also has to wonder what happened to the transparity we were promised? OPPPPPS that is about a democrat and therefore is off limits :roll:

Any one got any change left :D
 

TSR

Well-known member
Tam said:
TSR said:
Whether you like her or not, you still have to wonder if promises of such future speaking engagements and the money coming from them, didn't weigh heavily on her decision to quit as governor. :???:

From what she has told everyone that cares to listen to her, she left her Governors office because of the ethics lawsuits which I might remind you were all tossed out of court. She said they were costing Alaskans millions in legal fees and her office was getting nothing done because of them. She stepped down to save Alaska the money and so the State could get back to work. Now if these people that were hell bent on destroying her, and I think we all know who they were, would have been smart enough to see what their lawsuits were doing to Alaska, she might have been able to stay in her office.

The multiple lawsuits filed against her is a very good reason why the laws need to be changed so if you file and the case is tossed you pay ALL LEGAL COSTS. When you run up legal fees on an innocent person you should have to pay for your stupidity not the innocent person like Sarah had to. :x

BTW yes she had to leave to make money TO PAY HER LEGAL FEES.

I can only say when she first announced her resignation on national TV I saw it and nothing was mentioned about lawsuits as I recall. It certainly would have benefitted her, if she had imo.
 

TSR

Well-known member
Pig Farmer said:
Tam said:
TSR said:
Whether you like her or not, you still have to wonder if promises of such future speaking engagements and the money coming from them, didn't weigh heavily on her decision to quit as governor. :???:

From what she has told everyone that cares to listen to her, she left her Governors office because of the ethics lawsuits which I might remind you were all tossed out of court. She said they were costing Alaskans millions in legal fees and her office was getting nothing done because of them. She stepped down to save Alaska the money and so the State could get back to work. Now if these people that were hell bent on destroying her, and I think we all know who they were, would have been smart enough to see what their lawsuits were doing to Alaska, she might have been able to stay in her office.

The multiple lawsuits filed against her is a very good reason why the laws need to be changed so if you file and the case is tossed you pay ALL LEGAL COSTS. When you run up legal fees on an innocent person you should have to pay for your stupidity not the innocent person like Sarah had to. :x

BTW yes she had to leave to make money TO PAY HER LEGAL FEES.

Tam you are singing to the choir. These folks know all that you have posted. They are looking for a whopping child plain and simple.

Not one from he left even the brazen ot has the guts character or will to stand u to the true threat to this country and its People.

Oops sorry ot has the guts but not the character it takes to call an ace a ace and Spade a Spade. :cry:

When GW was in office many from the right posted the things GW did wrong.

Sad thing is the left does not mention good or bad omahma is doing rather they try and throw up smoke screens plain and simple.

BTW Pig Farmer what's a whopping child-a child of enormous size?
 
Top