go back and read the post. if you can't understand that the point of the post is that the extent of access was negotiated so that it could be agreed upon and protected by statute i guess i grossly overestimated any mental capacity you might possess. in the meantime you carried on as if it was only in canada that there might be restrictions on foreign ownership and here you are living under laws you didn't even know about but were an expert on candian law. once again you have set yourself up for ridicule. you just keep spewing crap hoping some of it might be true. you've continually lost credibility by just shooting from the hip with no background.