• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Border Agent Jailed - Unbelievable!

Help Support Ranchers.net:

Mike

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
28,480
Reaction score
0
Location
Montgomery, Al
Let's see OT defend this. :lol:

A U.S. Border Patrol agent has been sentenced to two years in prison for improperly lifting the arms of a 15-year-old drug smuggling suspect while handcuffed — in what the Justice Department called a deprivation of the teenager's constitutional right to be free from the use of unreasonable force.

Agent Jesus E. Diaz Jr. was named in a November 2009 federal grand jury indictment with deprivation of rights under color of law during an October 2008 arrest near the Rio Grande in Eagle Pass, Texas, in response to a report that illegal immigrants had crossed the river with bundles of drugs.

In a prosecution sought by the Mexican government and obtained after the suspected smuggler was given immunity to testify against the agent, Diaz was sentenced last week by U.S. District Judge Alia Moses Ludlum in San Antonio. The Mexican consulate in Eagle Pass had filed a formal written complaint just hours after the arrest, alleging that the teenager had been beaten.

Defense attorneys argued that there were no injuries or bruises on the suspected smuggler's lower arms where the handcuffs had been placed nor any bruising resulting from an alleged knee on his back. Photos showed the only marks on his body came from the straps of the pack he carried containing the suspected drugs, they said.

Border Patrol agents found more than 150 pounds of marijuana at the arrest site.

The defense claimed that the smuggling suspect was handcuffed because he was uncooperative and resisted arrest, and that the agent had lifted his arms to force him to the ground — a near-universal police technique — while the other agents looked for the drugs.

The allegations against Diaz, 31, a seven-year veteran of the Border Patrol, initially were investigated by Homeland Security's Office of Inspector General and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's Office of Professional Responsibility, which cleared the agent of any wrongdoing.

But the Internal Affairs Division at U.S. Customs and Border Protection ruled differently nearly a year later and, ultimately, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Western District of Texas brought charges.

The Law Enforcement Officers Advocates Council said the government's case was “based on false testimony that is contradicted by the facts.”

In a statement, the council said that because the arrest took place at about 2 a.m., darkness would have made it impossible for the government's witnesses to have seen whether any mistreatment took place. It said Marcos Ramos, the Border Patrol agent who stood next to Diaz, testified that he did not see any mistreatment of the smuggling suspect.

The council said other witnesses made contradictory claims and some later admitted to having perjured themselves. Such admissions, the council said, were ignored by the court and the government. It also said that probationary agents who claimed to have witnessed the assault raised no objections during the incident and failed to notify an on-duty supervisor until hours later.

“Instead, they went off-duty to a local 'Whataburger' restaurant, got their stories straight and reported it hours later to an off-duty supervisor at his home,” the council said. “Then the 'witnesses' went back to the station and reported their allegations.”

The council also noted that the teenager claimed no injuries in court other than sore shoulders, which the council attributed to “the weight of the drug load, approximately 75 pounds, he carried across the border.”

The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Western District of Texas, which brought the charges, is the same office that in February 2006 — under U.S. Attorney Johnny Sutton — prosecuted Border Patrol Agents Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean after they shot a drug-smuggling suspect, Osvaldo Aldrete-Davila, in the buttocks as he tried to flee back into Mexico after abandoning a van filled with 800 pounds of marijuana. Aldrete-Davila also was given immunity in the case and testified against the agents.

Agents Ramos and Compean were convicted and sentenced to 11 and 12 years in prison, respectively.

President George W. Bush commuted the sentences in 2009 after they had served two years.

The same prosecutors also charged Edwards County Deputy Sheriff Gilmer Hernandez in 2005 with violating the civil rights of a Mexican criminal alien after he shot out the tires of a van filled with illegals as it tried to run him over. One of the illegal immigrants in the van was hit with bullet fragments.
 

Mike

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
28,480
Reaction score
0
Location
Montgomery, Al
Oldtimer said:
Sounds like a repeat play of the Ramos and Compeon fiasco....

Not even close. In the Ramos situation, someone was shot in the azz. No one in this case was physically harmed.



The allegations against Diaz, 31, a seven-year veteran of the Border Patrol, initially were investigated by Homeland Security's Office of Inspector General and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's Office of Professional Responsibility, which cleared the agent of any wrongdoing.

But the Internal Affairs Division at U.S. Customs and Border Protection ruled differently nearly a year later and, ultimately, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Western District of Texas brought charges.

The Law Enforcement Officers Advocates Council said the government's case was “based on false testimony that is contradicted by the facts.”

It was about:
in what the Justice Department called a deprivation of the teenager's constitutional right to be free from the use of unreasonable force.
 

Steve

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
16,547
Reaction score
0
Location
Wildwood New Jersey
In all these cases it seems that it is the Mexican government interceding on behalf of drug runners.. and our department of Justice taking an extreme stand and prosecuting the law enforcement officers to the max allowed..

a person would think given the state of Mexico and the crime we are importing from them that neither side would take the time of day to even investigate these claims? but they continue to waste money and valuable assets on these cases..

if the officer crossed the line, just fire him and there would be no national outrage..
 

Mike

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
28,480
Reaction score
0
Location
Montgomery, Al
Steve said:
In all these cases it seems that it is the Mexican government interceding on behalf of drug runners.. and our department of Justice taking an extreme stand and prosecuting the law enforcement officers to the max allowed..

a person would think given the state of Mexico and the crime we are importing from them that neither side would take the time of day to even investigate these claims? but they continue to waste money and valuable assets on these cases..

if the officer crossed the line, just fire him and there would be no national outrage..

It's like the U.S. Attorney's Office & these Federal judges want the Border agents to stop doing their job. :???: :???: :???:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Mike said:
Steve said:
In all these cases it seems that it is the Mexican government interceding on behalf of drug runners.. and our department of Justice taking an extreme stand and prosecuting the law enforcement officers to the max allowed..

a person would think given the state of Mexico and the crime we are importing from them that neither side would take the time of day to even investigate these claims? but they continue to waste money and valuable assets on these cases..

if the officer crossed the line, just fire him and there would be no national outrage..

It's like the U.S. Attorney's Office & these Federal judges want the Border agents to stop doing their job. :???: :???: :???:

HELLO- are you just waking up to that :???: Since Reagan passed the last Amnesty- which included a law that made it a crime to hire illegal aliens- it has been virtually unenforced by both R's and D's administrations-- or the attorneys or the Judges they appointed... Just like the NAFTA rule to allow Mexican truckers access thruout the country- which GW's administration disobeyed a twice passed high majority Congressional law to allow- and which Obama has done much the same to.......

When the (supposed conservative) US Chamber of Commerce- joins the ACLU to oppose E-Verify or any ID law that could put their big money corporates or the wealthy employers into any criminal law danger from hiring illegals (their semi- slave labor)-- it doesn't take a genius to see they don't want any border activities stopped...

When you have wealthy multimillionaires sitting in D.C. making laws for the rest of the country-- don't expect those laws will benefit the middle class or working folks of the country.....
 

TSR

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 27, 2005
Messages
2,115
Reaction score
0
Oldtimer said:
Mike said:
Steve said:
In all these cases it seems that it is the Mexican government interceding on behalf of drug runners.. and our department of Justice taking an extreme stand and prosecuting the law enforcement officers to the max allowed..

a person would think given the state of Mexico and the crime we are importing from them that neither side would take the time of day to even investigate these claims? but they continue to waste money and valuable assets on these cases..

if the officer crossed the line, just fire him and there would be no national outrage..

It's like the U.S. Attorney's Office & these Federal judges want the Border agents to stop doing their job. :???: :???: :???:

I agree!

HELLO- are you just waking up to that :???: Since Reagan passed the last Amnesty- which included a law that made it a crime to hire illegal aliens- it has been virtually unenforced by both R's and D's administrations-- or the attorneys or the Judges they appointed... Just like the NAFTA rule to allow Mexican truckers access thruout the country- which GW's administration disobeyed a twice passed high majority Congressional law to allow- and which Obama has done much the same to.......

When the (supposed conservative) US Chamber of Commerce- joins the ACLU to oppose E-Verify or any ID law that could put their big money corporates or the wealthy employers into any criminal law danger from hiring illegals (their semi- slave labor)-- it doesn't take a genius to see they don't want any border activities stopped...

When you have wealthy multimillionaires sitting in D.C. making laws for the rest of the country-- don't expect those laws will benefit the middle class or working folks of the country.....
 

Latest posts

Top