• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Bristol Palin is preggo!!!!

kolanuraven

Well-known member
Bristol Palin, the 17 year old daughter of Sarah Palin, is pregnant


http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/




What about all this ' good Reps kids DO NOT HAVE SEX BEFORE MARRIAGE razz-a-mah-tazz??????/


Oh no........you Rep's don't arrive by immaculate conception after all!!!!!


What a shocker!!!!!
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
Avoid a discussion on your candidate's very qualifications and instead attack the other's family.

Yep, you libs ought to lead the country.
 

Larrry

Well-known member
Congratulations kola, I wondered who the first liberal would post this with condescention You have lived down to the liberal standard.
So much for leaving the kids out of it.
I'll bet it makes you proud.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
OOOPS-- Alaska must not be following King Georges sex ed policy of abstinence instead of education..... :???: :wink: :lol:

I wonder if Bob Barr knew this yesterday when he said he doesn't think McCain did a very good job of vetting Palin- and that he could get some surprises.....Choosing secrecy and a spectacular announcement over a thorough job...
 

Larrry

Well-known member
Why shouldn't the libs jump on this, after all they defended the child abusing cop. No wonder you are libs.
 

Chuck

Active member
kolanuraven said:
What a shocker!!!!!
What a sorry thing for you to be gleeful about. What is so shocking about it? It's not like it hasn't happened before. Sometimes teenaged girls get pregnant. She's lucky to have a family who will be able to help her. Or are you shocked that she is keeping the child? Would you like it better if she would have aborted it instead?
 

fff

Well-known member
kolanuraven said:
Bristol Palin, the 17 year old daughter of Sarah Palin, is pregnant


http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/




What about all this ' good Reps kids DO NOT HAVE SEX BEFORE MARRIAGE razz-a-mah-tazz??????/


Oh no........you Rep's don't arrive by immaculate conception after all!!!!!


What a shocker!!!!!

Are you telling me that CONSERVATIVE Republican daughters get pregnant before they get married? That abstinence education doesn't work? Shocking, I say, shocking!

It's a shame for this young woman that the whole nation knows her "secret." But grandma should have known it would hit the newsstands when she accepted the VP slot. Apparently the McCain camp didn't do much vetting of Gov Palin. The media is going to take care of that now. And they won't be gentle.
 

Larrry

Well-known member
Are you telling me that CONSERVATIVE Republican daughters get pregnant before they get married? That abstinence education doesn't work? Shocking, I say, shocking!
Are you that stupid

The media is going to take care of that now. And they won't be gentle.
Of course not she's not liberal, if she was the MSM and the liberals would praise her, but since she isn't you will attack her.

You libs are the most utterly sickening people. Does it make you feel good and superior that you have to attack a girl.
Your life must lack a heck of a lot that you feel you must attack kids.
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
Why do you libs talk about this, but you remain silent on Rezko and Ayers, and say that it is no big deal with your candidate calling a racist a "spiritual leader" for 20 years?

You feel it is more important that a girl in Alaska is pregnant than the fact that your candidate won't give a straight answer on elements of the Constitution and talks out of both sides of his mouth on the Second Amendment?

This prompts discussion, but you avoid the topic of your candidate's qualifications? You'll talk about the sexual history of a 17 year old girl, but not the history of who your candidate associates with?

You want to talk about a teenager who made a mistake just because of who her parents are, but the laundry list of "mistakes" Obama made garners not so much as even a denial?

I'm disgusted. This is beyond pathetic. I'm about ready to register as a Republican.
 

Soapweed

Well-known member
Sandhusker said:
Why do you libs talk about this, but you remain silent on Rezko and Ayers, and say that it is no big deal with your candidate calling a racist a "spiritual leader" for 20 years?

You feel it is more important that a girl in Alaska is pregnant than the fact that your candidate won't give a straight answer on elements of the Constitution and talks out of both sides of his mouth on the Second Amendment?

This prompts discussion, but you avoid the topic of your candidate's qualifications? You'll talk about the sexual history of a 17 year old girl, but not the history of who your candidate associates with?

You want to talk about a teenager who made a mistake just because of who her parents are, but the laundry list of "mistakes" Obama made garners not so much as even a denial?

I'm disgusted. This is beyond pathetic. I'm about ready to register as a Republican.

You should have done that a long time ago. :wink:

As for the subject at hand, "Let he (or she) who is perfect cast the first stone."

Sarah Palin cannot be held totally responsible for the actions of her daughter, who after all is 17 years old and the hormones have kicked into high gear. As parents, we all try to raise our kids right but sometimes we fail. Adults fail; kids fail; all any of us can ever do is to try to do our best.

Sometimes older children resent a young baby coming into a household. From an amateur psychologist's point of view :roll: :wink: it could possibly be that the 17-year-old girl thinks, "if Mom and Dad are going to fool around, I might just fool around, too." You never know.
 

VanC

Well-known member
Assessing the Political Impact of Bristol Palin's Pregnancy
ST. PAUL -- Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin announced moments ago that her 17-year-old daughter, Bristol, is five months pregnant and is planning to keep the baby and marry the father.

"We have been blessed with five wonderful children who we love with all our heart and mean everything to us," said Sarah and Todd Palin in a statement. "Our beautiful daughter Bristol came to us with news that as parents we knew would make her grow up faster than we had ever planned. We're proud of Bristol's decision to have her baby and even prouder to become grandparents. As Bristol faces the responsibilities of adulthood, she knows she has our unconditional love and support."

The news comes just 72 hours after Palin was introduced by John McCain as his vice presidential nominee. In the time between the pick and Palin's statement today, rumors had grown louder and louder that Palin's youngest son, Trig, was actually her grandson and that it was Bristol who had given birth to the young boy.

According to Reuters, McCain campaign officials knew about Bristol's pregnancy during the vetting process and that the rumors surrounding baby Trig's birth made an announcement necessary.

Reuters' Steve Holland writes: "McCain officials said the news of the daughter's pregnancy was being released to rebut what one aide called 'mud-slinging and lies' circulating on liberal blog sites."

The impact of such a bombshell announcement is hard to gauge so soon after it has been made public. Assessing the way it could influence the race is also complicated by the ongoing wall-to-wall coverage of Hurricane Gustav -- the cable networks have stuck with the coverage of the natural disaster so far, just adding a line in the news crawl about the Palin revelation.

Conservative blogs appear to be rallying to Palin's side in the matter. Townhall.com, a prominent conservative website, has already expressed support for the Palins in a blog post.

Writes Carol Platt Liebau:

"I admire all the Palins' willingness to be forthright about the pregnancy, their pro-life convictions even when they entail personal pain or embarrassment, and their understanding that babies need and deserve to have a father and a mother who are committed to each other in marriage."

That quick support will be key to shaping how the issue is treated since, for social conservatives, a teenage pregnancy is something of a jump ball.

On the one hand, premarital sex is frowned upon. On the other, the Palins' commitment to keep the baby and Bristol Palin's pledge to marry the father of the child gives social conservatives something to latch on to if they are looking for positives out of this situation.

A few other factors to remember when trying to figure out how this will play out.

* Palin has a VERY strong following among social conservatives who are nearly certain to give her the benefit of the doubt in this situation. She is a known commodity in social conservative circles and is regarded as "one of them" -- a fact that should lessen any criticism from the right.

* Democrats must be VERY careful not to take a false step here. Some Republicans have already insisted that the Obama campaign is behind the rumor-mongering about Sarah, Bristol and Trig -- although in our experience the campaign has not pushed the story AT ALL, in fact they have been encouraging reporters to focus on the issues of difference between the two candidates rather than personal stories. Any sense that Democrats are pushing this idea will almost certainly turn both Sarah and Bristol Palin into sympathetic figures -- and that spells trouble for her detractors.

By Chris Cillizza | September 1, 2008; 1:11 PM ET | Category: Eye on 2008


It'll certainly be interesting to see how the Democrats treat this one. If the unrestrained glee in Kola's original post is the direction they're going to go then all I can say is "be careful what you wish for."

We've already seen the Obama campaign drop the ball on the issue of Palin's experience. By attempting to ridicule her lack of it, all it did was remind people that Obama has none himself, an area of discussion they've been working overtime to avoid.

Bristol made a mistake. People will understand that. It's how she reacts that's the true test. Do you think most Americans would look more kindly on her keeping the baby and marrying the father, as she says she's going to, or would they prefer that she high-tail it to the nearest abortion factory and have the life inside her snuffed out by people who look upon an unborn baby as if it were some sort of cancer?

Here's what Gov. Palin said: "Our beautiful daughter Bristol came to us with news that as parents we knew would make her grow up faster than we had ever planned. We're proud of Bristol's decision to have her baby and even prouder to become grandparents. As Bristol faces the responsibilities of adulthood, she knows she has our unconditional love and support."

Do you really want that statement put next to Obama's statement that, if his daughter were to become pregnant, he would see it as some sort of "punishment"? Which one do you think the American people would be more sympathetic toward? Do you really want the American people to be reminded that, as an Illinois senator, Obama was the ONLY person that voted against a law that would force doctors to give care to live babies that had survived an abortion? That, in effect, Obama voted FOR the status quo, which involved placing those babies in filthy closets, without care, until they died?

I didn't think so. :roll:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
This wouldn't be as much of a story if it wasn't so ironic- and flies in the face of the current GW/Whitehouse neocon policy of backing some of the radical evangelicals that oppose any sex education in school - and any programs that give advice or help with birth control/STD prevention- saying that should be left entirely to the parents to handle....
And that the only prevention should be Abstinence....

I guess Grandma Sarah forgot to tell Bristol about those hormones- EH :???:
 

jodywy

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
This wouldn't be as much of a story if it wasn't so ironic- and flies in the face of the current GW/Whitehouse neocon policy of backing some of the radical evangelicals that oppose any sex education in school - and any programs that give advice or help with birth control/STD prevention- saying that should be left entirely to the parents to handle....
And that the only prevention should be Abstinence....

I guess Grandma Sarah forgot to tell Bristol about those hormones- EH :???:
Why is it the school and governments Responsibility,are they also Responsible for people signing morgatages they couldn't pay, or the loss in home value.... what ever in hell happened to personal Responsibility... seem Sarah Palin, her daughter and future son inlaw have taken on PERSONAL RESPONSIBILTY and not like so many in ththis country say the Government should of!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
jodywy said:
Oldtimer said:
This wouldn't be as much of a story if it wasn't so ironic- and flies in the face of the current GW/Whitehouse neocon policy of backing some of the radical evangelicals that oppose any sex education in school - and any programs that give advice or help with birth control/STD prevention- saying that should be left entirely to the parents to handle....
And that the only prevention should be Abstinence....

I guess Grandma Sarah forgot to tell Bristol about those hormones- EH :???:
Why is it the school and governments Responsibility,are they also Responsible for people signing morgatages they couldn't pay, or the loss in home value.... what ever in hell happened to personal Responsibility... seem Sarah Palin, her daughter and future son inlaw have taken on PERSONAL RESPONSIBILTY and not like so many in ththis country say the Government should of!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

So you're saying that Sarah Palin did a terrible job and failed with teaching her daughter sex ed and responsibility :???: ....In other words she can't handle even the issues at home or with her family- but we're supposed to trust her with the issues of the country :???: Or was this a planned pregnancy :???:

To me its not that big a deal-- but some of the neocon Repubs and Bush have made it that way with their sticking their noses in local/state school issues and Social Systems offices- and trying to promote their ethics beliefs on the country.....
 

jodywy

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
jodywy said:
Oldtimer said:
This wouldn't be as much of a story if it wasn't so ironic- and flies in the face of the current GW/Whitehouse neocon policy of backing some of the radical evangelicals that oppose any sex education in school - and any programs that give advice or help with birth control/STD prevention- saying that should be left entirely to the parents to handle....
And that the only prevention should be Abstinence....

I guess Grandma Sarah forgot to tell Bristol about those hormones- EH :???:
Why is it the school and governments Responsibility,are they also Responsible for people signing morgatages they couldn't pay, or the loss in home value.... what ever in hell happened to personal Responsibility... seem Sarah Palin, her daughter and future son inlaw have taken on PERSONAL RESPONSIBILTY and not like so many in ththis country say the Government should of!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

So you're saying that Sarah Palin did a terrible job and failed with teaching her daughter sex ed and responsibility :???: ....In other words she can't handle even the issues at home or with her family- but we're supposed to trust her with the issues of the country :???: Or was this a planned pregnancy :???:

Oh the school system dose such a good job now with 100% of our kids…
It is a kid, do they always listen, and sometimes they have to touch the metal after you hit it with girder to know it hot.
Did her daughter do go get an abortion with out her knowledge?
I get sick and tire there of people that want the government to take care of every flipping thing they do.
 

Larrry

Well-known member
OT you can pat yourself on the back and help take credit for Hussein Obama and his defeat.
OT you are the biggest hypocrite there is you condemn someone for bringing kids into one of your posts yet you have to be such a pathetic old man that you have to bring kids into this post. I'll bet you beat your kids also or just conservative kids.
 

kolanuraven

Well-known member
fff said:
kolanuraven said:
Bristol Palin, the 17 year old daughter of Sarah Palin, is pregnant


http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/




What about all this ' good Reps kids DO NOT HAVE SEX BEFORE MARRIAGE razz-a-mah-tazz??????/


Oh no........you Rep's don't arrive by immaculate conception after all!!!!!


What a shocker!!!!!

Are you telling me that CONSERVATIVE Republican daughters get pregnant before they get married? That abstinence education doesn't work? Shocking, I say, shocking!

It's a shame for this young woman that the whole nation knows her "secret." But grandma should have known it would hit the newsstands when she accepted the VP slot. Apparently the McCain camp didn't do much vetting of Gov Palin. The media is going to take care of that now. And they won't be gentle.



I know, it's astounding isn't it? :shock: :shock: :shock: And just think how they all we up under John Edwards and his buisness...and how " horrible" he was and all that.


What goes around comes around!!!!!! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


I guess with just one conversation and a cell phone call to offer the #2 job in the nation....mentioning that Bristol missed her period isn't one of the topics!! :lol: :lol:


Stupid girl......look at the mess she's placed on her mothers career.

I bet that boy will run like a scaled dog. He didn't sign on to be the son in law of the VP.....Secret Service all around all the time....don't you know he's mainlining Maalox right now.


On the topic of teaching her kids sex ed.....she, Sarah, must not know them herself. Anyone and everyone knows that having a baby AFTER 40 raises the chances up exponentially of having a child with some sort of disability. She was risking that childs life, health and well being...and she did.

She's appearing just as careless as McCain...maybe they deserve each other.
 
Top