• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Buckwheat's CIA Director Was Wrong

Mike

Well-known member
Spy Agency Fiasco (Panetta amateur hour at CIA, our safety suffers)
daily beast | 8/17/2009 | Joseph Finder



Three former CIA directors have privately told their successor he had his facts wrong when he revealed an illegal assassination program, reports Joseph Finder, and his spies will suffer for it.

according to a half-dozen sources, including several very senior, recently retired CIA officials, clandestine-service officers, and Cabinet-level officials from the Bush administration, the real story is at once more innocent—Panetta was mistaken; no law was broken—and far more troubling: an inexperienced CIA director, unfamiliar with how his vast, complicated agency works, unable to trust senior officials within his own agency, and desperate to keep his hands clean, screwed up.

The Daily Beast has learned that shortly after his electrifying June 24 disclosure, Panetta spoke personally with each of his three predecessors—George Tenet, Porter Goss, and Michael Hayden—and only then realized the mistake he’d made about the program. An innocent mistake, but the consequences of his gaffe, which he’s unable to admit without damaging his own reputation further, will likely subject U.S. intelligence capabilities to unnecessary and intrusive oversight for years to come.


(Excerpt) Read more at thedailybeast.com ...
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
A Daily Beast exclusive... :wink: :lol: :lol: :p
Every media outlet and blog trying to play National Enquirer with their own exclusive of the day--made up especially to tantalize the cult they play to..... :roll:

I saw a program the other day on all the frauds and scams being perpetrated around the country every day- and the inability of the FTC to police them all because they were cut so bad (about 1/2 the size they were in 1979)...
And the number one thing that came out was that if even half these media outlets would take some responsibility- and look into their advertisers and do some verification before they allowed them to take out ads scamming people- much of it could be stopped....
But greed and profiteering come before ethics and morals in too many business's anymore...
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Guess the Feds will just have to take control of the internet.

Maybe they should lock Ranchers down too. Don't some of the ads that pop up on Ranchers fit into that "scamming" category?
 
Top