Broke Cowboy said:cure said:I didn't say I agreed with how the feds are handling this all I am saying is that the press is making this out to be poor poor bundy when in fact it was all self inflicted I look at this whole deal as a case where two not niceholes met.
What you said is this:
Bundy is getting just what he deserves in my opinion
per said:Now this is the robust discussion I remember from several years back on Ranchers.net. What ever he deserves is immaterial to me. I want to know what you folks think of the ever present creep of the state on environmental issues. That is what started this 20 years ago.
Broke Cowboy said:per said:Now this is the robust discussion I remember from several years back on Ranchers.net. What ever he deserves is immaterial to me. I want to know what you folks think of the ever present creep of the state on environmental issues. That is what started this 20 years ago.
Environmental issues?
You mean where a fellow drives up and talks to you about it like they used to?
Or the way it is usually approached now?
Heck even the SPCA in Ontario never shows up without 5 - 6 police cars and bullet proof vest guys carrying long guns now.
bc
I was told it by a blm agent that was working down there when the feds were making the deal cliven. I also was told the same thing from my buddy that runs next to cliven.Ho55 said:Cure. Just a question. I'd like to know where you saw or heard he took their buyout? I talked to Cliven and he said he refused to take their money. Just trying to figure this out in my mind. This is just a polite question. I'm not implying one way or another.
FH you are incorrect about Forest Service Rangers. The Forest Service is comprised of several regions. Each region is comprised of forests and or grasslands. Each forest or grassland is comprised of districts. The head of a district is a Ranger. Rangers are permanent full time positions and they are the decision makers for the districts, not a summer tour guide. The west doesn't understand everything :wink:Faster horses said:kolanuraven said:Big Muddy rancher said:Kola if you don;t know that's OK. Just admit it. we'll understand. :?
I think what FH was meaning is that BLM and Forest service should be staffed by knowledgeable people regarding environmental issues such as grassland heath and forest health and proper stocking rate. Since when have they become SWAT teams. Why not go through the County Sheriff to execute warrants ect.
Well, I'm NOT able to read minds like you.
Forest Service rangers ARE law enforcement.
County sheriff....my guess is that since public lands are a FEDERAL issue...not a county issue is why the Forest Service is in the mix with the BLM.
Come on....read my mind right now!!! I dare ya...come on...I double dog dare ya!!!! :wink:
No, Forest Service Rangers are not law enforcement. Neither are BLM Personnel.
In the Forest Service there are Rangers and there are Officers.
Officers are the actual law enforcement for the forest. They are basically the forest cops.
Rangers are the people who take groups on hikes and do all of the traditional park ranger duties.
USFS Ranger positions are usually college students are usually seasonal and have no law enforcement duties.
In the West, we understand these things. :wink:
Is there any way to find the name and addresses of the blm employees for this county of nevada? The leftists like to post the name and addresses in the paper of those with a gun permit and such. Turn about is fair play.rem_243 said:FH you are incorrect about Forest Service Rangers. The Forest Service is comprised of several regions. Each region is comprised of forests and or grasslands. Each forest or grassland is comprised of districts. The head of a district is a Ranger. Rangers are permanent full time positions and they are the decision makers for the districts, not a summer tour guide. The west doesn't understand everything :wink:Faster horses said:kolanuraven said:Well, I'm NOT able to read minds like you.
Forest Service rangers ARE law enforcement.
County sheriff....my guess is that since public lands are a FEDERAL issue...not a county issue is why the Forest Service is in the mix with the BLM.
Come on....read my mind right now!!! I dare ya...come on...I double dog dare ya!!!! :wink:
No, Forest Service Rangers are not law enforcement. Neither are BLM Personnel.
In the Forest Service there are Rangers and there are Officers.
Officers are the actual law enforcement for the forest. They are basically the forest cops.
Rangers are the people who take groups on hikes and do all of the traditional park ranger duties.
USFS Ranger positions are usually college students are usually seasonal and have no law enforcement duties.
In the West, we understand these things. :wink:
Mike said:Where do the turtles fit in all this? :roll:
Denny said:I know nothing of this case around here it's either private or state and county owned most of the state and county ground is either all forest or swamp no inbetween.You have to either rent from private land owners on a year to year deal or buy it. I'm a$$ deep in debt buying land but at least I'm in control of it that way.
Broke Cowboy said:Broke Cowboy said:cure said:I didn't say I agreed with how the feds are handling this all I am saying is that the press is making this out to be poor poor bundy when in fact it was all self inflicted I look at this whole deal as a case where two not niceholes met.
What you said is this:
Bundy is getting just what he deserves in my opinion
So do not twist it
What is your motive?
What will you do when they find a reason to come after you?
Almost any excuse will do.
You are not the person I thought you were - but I will leave this now - you are apparently happy he is getting "what he deserves"
bc
rem_243 said:FH you are incorrect about Forest Service Rangers. The Forest Service is comprised of several regions. Each region is comprised of forests and or grasslands. Each forest or grassland is comprised of districts. The head of a district is a Ranger. Rangers are permanent full time positions and they are the decision makers for the districts, not a summer tour guide. The west doesn't understand everything :wink:Faster horses said:kolanuraven said:Well, I'm NOT able to read minds like you.
Forest Service rangers ARE law enforcement.
County sheriff....my guess is that since public lands are a FEDERAL issue...not a county issue is why the Forest Service is in the mix with the BLM.
Come on....read my mind right now!!! I dare ya...come on...I double dog dare ya!!!! :wink:
No, Forest Service Rangers are not law enforcement. Neither are BLM Personnel.
In the Forest Service there are Rangers and there are Officers.
Officers are the actual law enforcement for the forest. They are basically the forest cops.
Rangers are the people who take groups on hikes and do all of the traditional park ranger duties.
USFS Ranger positions are usually college students are usually seasonal and have no law enforcement duties.
In the West, we understand these things. :wink:
kolanuraven said:Broke Cowboy said:Broke Cowboy said:What you said is this:
So do not twist it
What is your motive?
What will you do when they find a reason to come after you?
Almost any excuse will do.
You are not the person I thought you were - but I will leave this now - you are apparently happy he is getting "what he deserves"
bc
Calm down GI Joe............
Why would you think 'cure' has a motive? Maybe he just stated his opinion after all this is a forum for just that.
Seriously, I doubt he gives a ratz arse what you think you him, him being ' cure'..........
This thread is not about the poster named ' cure'...keep up.