• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Bushie!!

loomixguy

Well-known member
Littlejoe posted to "friends",
That his hatred of Bush knows no ends.
George Bush tries to utter,
But all he can manage is to stutter,
Causing OT to soak his Depends.
 

jigs

Well-known member
rather have a guy who appears to be a goof, that loves America, than a guy who is thought of as a messiah, and hates America.....Obama is a Cancer to America....
 

Faster horses

Well-known member
jigs said:
rather have a guy who appears to be a goof, that loves America, than a guy who is thought of as a messiah, and hates America.....Obama is a Cancer to America....


:agree: Any day of the week!!!!!!!!
 

Larrry

Well-known member
Spayyourliberals.jpg
 

littlejoe

Well-known member
jigs said:
rather have a guy who appears to be a goof, that loves America, than a guy who is thought of as a messiah, and hates America.....Obama is a Cancer to America....

When bush got in office, we were running about a 5 trillion surplus.

When he left, we were in deficit, about 10 trillion.

Most spent on foreign entanglements/wars that were and are none of our business.

Think for a moment what we could have done with that $$ in our own country, for our own people.

You say he loves America---if so, glad he don't hate it---he did a tremendous amount of damage which includes setting us up for the succeeding horse's ass to take us farther down the road to perdition. And he had the tremendously inept republican party helping him.
 

ranch hand

Well-known member
We had a 911 under Bush that could have stopped under Clinton. The other is half truth.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2011/jun/02/steny-hoyer/steny-hoyer-says-george-w-bush-inherited-56-trilli/
 

Tam

Well-known member
littlejoe said:
jigs said:
rather have a guy who appears to be a goof, that loves America, than a guy who is thought of as a messiah, and hates America.....Obama is a Cancer to America....

When bush got in office, we were running about a 5 trillion surplus.

When he left, we were in deficit, about 10 trillion.

Most spent on foreign entanglements/wars that were and are none of our business.

Think for a moment what we could have done with that $$ in our own country, for our own people.

You say he loves America---if so, glad he don't hate it---he did a tremendous amount of damage which includes setting us up for the succeeding horse's ass to take us farther down the road to perdition. And he had the tremendously inept republican party helping him.

OH PLEASE You do realize Bush only signed into law the laws the House and Congress wrote don't you so blaming him alone for the debt is a bit off base especially since for the last two years of the Bush administration the DEMOCRATS had control of both. The same DEMOCRATS that had total control during the first two years of Obama's Administration when your national debt really sky rocketed. Then you have the wars that you want to blame on Bush you also realize that the President does not have the power to declare war on a foreign country or terrorist group, that IS ALSO THE CONGRESS THAT DOES THAT. Unless you are Obama that is. Now if you are like so many others that want to blame Bush and claim he lied about WMD to get the US into war do yourself a favor and google "Democrat quotes on WMD",

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." --Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." --Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton, signed by: -- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." -Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." -- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." Letter to President Bush, Signed by: -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them." -- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." -- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" -- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." -- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..." -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

Take a look at the dates to these DEMOCRAP quotes LITTLE joe and tell us again who was lying about WMD. These people are just as responsible for the war in Iraq as Bush but once they saw the truth they, like all Democraps, changed their stories and laid the total blame on Bush. If there was an speck of integrity in that whole friggin party they would admit to the truth of their part in the wars (the declaring of them and the financing of them) but nope they lie and act as if we don't have any means to prove what they were spewing for years before Bush was elected. :mad:

So PLEASE before you try blame Bush for EVERYTHING stop and do us all a favor and do a little research for info that you are not going to see on that Liberal loving MSNBC. :roll:
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Larrry said:
now we know about ots experiences and friends. He makes them up trying to not feel so alone

kinda like the newspapers he reads, so he appears more intelligent than Palin.
The newspapers he claims to be able read, make things up, as they go...

..if someone, like Palin, doesn`t agree with the lies that the NYTimes, or the Dem. party, writes, then they are not an ìndependant thinker :roll:
 

Tam

Well-known member
littlejoe said:
jigs said:
rather have a guy who appears to be a goof, that loves America, than a guy who is thought of as a messiah, and hates America.....Obama is a Cancer to America....

When bush got in office, we were running about a 5 trillion surplus.

When he left, we were in deficit, about 10 trillion.

Most spent on foreign entanglements/wars that were and are none of our business.

Think for a moment what we could have done with that $$ in our own country, for our own people.

You say he loves America---if so, glad he don't hate it---he did a tremendous amount of damage which includes setting us up for the succeeding horse's ass to take us farther down the road to perdition. And he had the tremendously inept republican party helping him.

So defending the US citizens from foreign Terrorist attacks is not your Commander and Chief's business? :? BTW LITTLE joe read this and try blame the war on Iraq on Bush again
Bush wins Congress backing over war on Iraq

The U.S. Congress has granted President George W. Bush the authorisation he sought to wage war if necessary to disarm Iraq, as the Senate followed the House of Representatives to support him with overwhelming votes.

Handing Bush a major victory, the Democratic-led Senate voted 77-23 for a war powers resolution negotiated between the White House and congressional leaders backing a possible use of force to rid Iraq of suspected weapons of mass destruction and possibly oust Iraqi President Saddam Hussein.

The Republican-led House earlier on Thursday passed it 296-133.

Bush has sought the congressional resolution as the United States presses the U.N. Security Council to adopt a tough new measure demanding that Saddam abandon any programs for biological, chemical or nuclear weapons or face possible military consequences.

"With tonight's vote in the United States Senate, America speaks with one voice," Bush said in a statement, saying Congress "has spoken clearly to the international community and the United Nations security council."

"Saddam Hussein and his outlaw regime pose a grave threat to the region, the world, and the United States. Inaction is not an option, disarmament is a must," Bush said.


then about that national Debt and Deficit LITTLE joe

President Barack Obama: Added $5.081 trillion, a 44% increase to the $11.657 trillion debt level attributable to Bush's at the end of his last budget, FY 2009.
•FY 2013 - $672 billion.
•FY 2012 - $1.276 trillion.
•FY 2011 - $1.229 trillion.
•FY 2010 - $1.652 trillion.
•FY 2009 - $253 billion. (Congress passed the Economic Stimulus Act, which spent $253 billion in FY 2009. This rare occurrence should be added to President Obama's contribution to the debt.)
President George W. Bush: Added $5.849 trillion, a 101% increase to the $5.8 trillion debt level at the end of Clinton's last budget, FY 2001. •FY 2009 - $1.632 trillion. (Bush's deficit without the impact of the Economic Stimulus Act).
•FY 2008 - $1.017 trillion.
•FY 2007 - $501 billion.
•FY 2006 - $574 billion.
•FY 2005 - $554 billion.
•FY 2004 - $596 billion.
•FY 2003 - $555 billion.
•FY 2002 - $421 billion.
President Bill Clinton: Added $1.396 trillion, a 32% increase to the $4.4 trillion debt level at the end of Bush's last budget, FY 1993. •FY 2001 - $133 billion.
•FY 2000 - $18 billion.
•FY 1999 - $130 billion.
•FY 1998 - $113 billion.
•FY 1997 - $188 billion.
•FY 1996 - $251 billion.
•FY 1995 - $281 billion.
•FY 1994 - $281 billion.

Since we all know the spending bills are written and passed by the Congress, care to guess who had control of the House and Senate when the spending under Clinton was under a trillion? Then care to guess who was in charge of the Congress when it jumped to up over a trillion under Bush and continued over a trillion under Obama? Care to guess who was in control of the House when the spending went back to under a Trillion under Obama? I think you know but are you man enough to admit it? Or has you hatred of Bush blinded you to the facts? :?
 

smalltime

Well-known member
Here's a question for all of you.Why would such a lover of America,Bush,get on a plane with a hater of America,Obama,to go to a funeral?Could it be thier both on the same page?
 

Big Muddy rancher

Well-known member
He loves America enough to know that the plane was flying and it would divide the carbon foot print in half if two rode for the price of one. lord knows Obama doesn't worry about his Caron usage. Besides it was reported that they rode in separate compartments on the plane.
 

Larrry

Well-known member
Why would you ask that question. Do you not think people can put their differences aside at a time like this. To presume Bush won't put differences aside shows you do not have a grasp. You presume Bush to be self centered only about himself....Bush proved you wrong.

Thats a thing liberals have a hard time grasping. They have proven the are the most partisan group of people who will not look past differences in times of need. They are self centered, as evidenced by the obama regime
 

hopalong

Well-known member
Because Bush who loves america was trying to save us some money??some of that money obama wastes sending two planes to HA. for vacation?? or for pizza in NY?????just to name a few possible reason>>>
 
Top