• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Calling Oldtimer

Tam

Well-known member
Oldtimer is the one that is always talking about BUSH and the foreign aid he spent rebuilding sandpits verses rebuilding the US, so I would like to read his opinion on which one of these men he supports.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51E0GV_JXK4


The one that Obama, the man that campaigned on cutting foreign aid and rebuilding the US, appointed that is defending additional foreign aid to a country that is now run by the Muslim Brotherhood that hates the US

Or the one the Tea Party supports and feels giving more money to a corrupt government is maybe not in the best interest of the US.

:?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Tam--You must read only what you want to- or have comprehension problems.... As in just the last week I've put up 2 or 3 posts supporting Rand Paul's move more toward the Libertarian stance of keeping our nose out of foreign countries- and that includes foreign aid....

And I supported the same when it was Obama's campaign stance- and that the money is better utilized at home...
 

Big Muddy rancher

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
Tam--You must read only what you want to- or have comprehension problems.... As in just the last week I've put up 2 or 3 posts supporting Rand Paul's move more toward the Libertarian stance of keeping our nose out of foreign countries- and that includes foreign aid....

And I supported the same when it was Obama's campaign stance- and that the money is better utilized at home...

Doesn't he fall under your classification as a "*********"?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Big Muddy rancher said:
Oldtimer said:
Tam--You must read only what you want to- or have comprehension problems.... As in just the last week I've put up 2 or 3 posts supporting Rand Paul's move more toward the Libertarian stance of keeping our nose out of foreign countries- and that includes foreign aid....

And I supported the same when it was Obama's campaign stance- and that the money is better utilized at home...

Doesn't he fall under your classification as a "*********"?

He's moving more away from them and more toward his Libertarian/Independent upbringing... His Dad- Ron Paul has long been a Libertarian spokesman- and was the first person I supported in the 2008 election... If you remember (in our discussions with Sandhusker) I even got the mothballs out of my wallet and donated to his campaign... But the split Republican Party turned him away... The same as they will with Rand, I'm afraid...
 

Tam

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
Tam--You must read only what you want to- or have comprehension problems.... As in just the last week I've put up 2 or 3 posts supporting Rand Paul's move more toward the Libertarian stance of keeping our nose out of foreign countries- and that includes foreign aid....

And I supported the same when it was Obama's campaign stance- and that the money is better utilized at home...

My COMPREHENSION is just fine Oldtimer so please answer this. :wink: :lol:

What do you think about the fact Obama's Administration is not living up to the campaign stance they bought your vote with? :?

And what doing you think of the fact when you were calling the likes of Rand a *********, he and a lot that support him had the same thoughts as you?

You see Oldtimer you took so much time bad mouthing the likes of Rand to defend your voting for a incompetent liar due to his skin color, so nobody would consider you a RACIST like you called all of us that did not support Obama and his corrupt administration, that now you have to face the truth that OBAMA BOUGHT YOU WITH LIES AND YOU DEFENDED THEM FOR YEARS. :roll:
 

Tam

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
Big Muddy rancher said:
Oldtimer said:
Tam--You must read only what you want to- or have comprehension problems.... As in just the last week I've put up 2 or 3 posts supporting Rand Paul's move more toward the Libertarian stance of keeping our nose out of foreign countries- and that includes foreign aid....

And I supported the same when it was Obama's campaign stance- and that the money is better utilized at home...

Doesn't he fall under your classification as a "*********"?

He's moving more away from them and more toward his Libertarian/Independent upbringing... His Dad- Ron Paul has long been a Libertarian spokesman- and was the first person I supported in the 2008 election... If you remember (in our discussions with Sandhusker) I even got the mothballs out of my wallet and donated to his campaign... But the split Republican Party turned him away... The same as they will with Rand, I'm afraid...


How Republicans and the tea party see the 2016 field differently

By Jennifer De Pinto

As conservatives and tea party activists gather in Washington this week for the annual CPAC (Conservative Political Action Committee) conference, some potential 2016 presidential contenders will be jockeying for the spotlight.

The next presidential election may be two years away, but a look inside a recent CBS News/New York Times poll offers some clues as to what tea party Republicans may be looking for in 2016 - at least at this early stage.

Tea party Republicans show the most interest in Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., as a presidential contender and the least in New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie. Gov. Jeb Bush R-Fla., is close behind in the percent who'd like to see a run, along with Sens. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, and Marco Rubio, R-Fla.

Fifty-six percent of Republicans who identify as tea partiers would like to see Paul run in 2016 - the highest percentage of any GOPer asked about in the poll and the only potential contender to reach the 50 percent mark. Just 13 percent of tea party Republicans don't want Paul to run.

Are we to believe you are now a ********* Oldtimer? :wink: :lol: :lol:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
As I said many a time before-- my goal in 2008 was to make sure the Bush type folks- that kept singing their war chant and waving their spears while walking around saying "the fundamentals of the economy are strong" as Wall Street tumbled about them- were taken out of office...

And Ron Paul was my candidate- until the Repubs thru him out... He would have been my candidate if he'd gotten the Libertarian nomination or had ran as an Independent... But since he wasn't- I went with the candidate that showed the best chance of ridding the Bush follower's regime...

As I said in the other post- If Paul continues to move toward the Libertarian platform on social issues- which he knows he must in order to win a national election- I don't think he will keep much of the Tea Party/right wing evangelical following...
 

Tam

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
As I said many a time before-- my goal in 2008 was to make sure the Bush type folks- that kept singing their war chant and waving their spears while walking around saying "the fundamentals of the economy are strong" as Wall Street tumbled about them- were taken out of office...

And Ron Paul was my candidate- until the Repubs thru him out... He would have been my candidate if he'd gotten the Libertarian nomination or had ran as an Independent... But since he wasn't- I went with the candidate that showed the best chance of ridding the Bush follower's regime...

As I said in the other post- If Paul continues to move toward the Libertarian platform on social issues- which he knows he must in order to win a national election- I don't think he will keep much of the Tea Party/right wing evangelical following...



Oldtimer, You are a joke, as you blamed Bush for all the troubles but the facts prove you voted for a party that lied, about their support of what Bush did, to get your vote.

The Dems. cried for and supported the invasion of Iraq and FUNDED IT. as they have funded all the Obama's war efforts and when his war efforts, in Libya, went sideways THEY LIED AGAIN to cover their next campaign lie about Obama having the terrorists on the run. ANd because of Obama's crap negotiation skills Iraq, that Bush won is back in terrorist hands. :roll:

The Dems stood in the way of economic reforms to save the US economy before it collapsed due to Fanny and Freddy under Bush as their election campaigns were being funded by those involved. H*ll Barney Frank was even sleeping with one of them but you blame BUSH. :roll:

You voted for an incompetent Junior Senator that made all kinds of nice lofty campaign promises about CHANGE and he broke every one of them. :roll:

Did you vote for the Senator that supported limited executive power under Bush or did you vote for the guy in the Oval Office that has a PEN and Phone that has Democrat Constitutional Professors warning about the lasting affects of his power grabs? Funny how they are the same person isn't it Oldtimer?

Did you vote for promised Transparency or did you vote for the most secretive Administration in History? as again they are the same Oldtimer.

Not only did you vote for Obama but when lie after lie was exposed you spent 5 years DEFENDING him. :roll:


Rand Paul is heavily supported by people you have spent the last 5 years calling very derogatory names and now you think you can just forget all the name calling and move on. :roll:

If you are going to become a ********* by supporting Rand Paul, at least be a man enough to admit Obama is a Liar that bought your vote because he also blames everything on Bush and denies his own party had anything to do with the failing US economy or weak Foreign Reputation. :wink: :roll:
 

Tam

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
As I said many a time before-- my goal in 2008 was to make sure the Bush type folks- that kept singing their war chant and waving their spears while walking around saying "the fundamentals of the economy are strong" as Wall Street tumbled about them- were taken out of office......

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMnSp4qEXNM


See Oldtimer this is why you are a joke?

You and The Dems forget that everything the Dems and You claim can be fact checked in about 3 seconds to prove you and them are LYING. :wink:


You voted for a party that encouraged and funded the Iraq War and voted against Fanny and Freddy being regulated prior to their collapse. :roll:
You and they blamed Bush but facts proved otherwise. Those darn researchable facts and recorded Democrat quotes. :( :wink:

They claimed Al Queada was on run after OBAMA KILLED OSAMA. but gee who was it that killed the Ambassador in Benghazi? And no Oldtimer he was not killed over a video like your party of choice claimed for weeks prior to your hero's re-election. :roll:

They claimed they are all about providing affordable healthcare for everyone and that everyone that liked their insurance and Doctors could keep them and insurance premiums would come down.

BUT millions are now losing their insurance and Doctors are
not able to see their patients as they are not in the Obamacare network of providers. And Sebelius admitted this week PREMIUMS ARE GOING UP NOT DOWN. Ever wonder why Obama keeps delaying the mandates forcing people to buy Insurance if Obamacare is so great Oldtimer? Who is he protecting from his signature law of the land the voters or the Dems that have to face the voters come Nov.?

They claim they are all about job creation in a horrible economy but every thing Obama has signed into law has turned out to be a job KILLER. Tax hikes, Obamacare, minimum wage increase, overtime pay rules. are all working to kill jobs.

They are all about women's rights but Obama is sueing the Little Sisters of the Poor to force them to go against their religious beliefs, where are these women's rights?

See where I'm going Oldtimer, you bought a load of CRAP from a party that would know the truth if it walked up and slapped them. :roll:
 

Latest posts

Top