If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Reply to thread

Message

This is a prime example of what an idiot you are. Japan is importing NON TESTED BEEF. Japan is negotiating AGE VERIFICATION. Nothing has been mentioned about testing in Japan's negotiations with the US yet you insist Japan wants testing. Hahaha! That's how stupid you are.

Oh listen to you little Sandcheska. Like the damn hypocrite you are, you thank Agman for his honesty when Agman said that I was wrong on calendar year 2004. Then you turn around and question Agman's data when the same data proves my original statement correct. Hahaha!

Nothing I can say will prove what a parasite you are more than that. You pick and choose what you want to believe and there is the proof in black and white.

The bottom line is this, if the data Agman and I provided was not good enough to prove my original statement right, then it wasn't good enough to prove me wrong on calendar year 2004 and you should have never accepted the money. But you did because you are nothing but a damn hypocrite just like your sidekick Conman. The end justifies the means and you will justify anything that supports your bias like the counterfeit you are even if it means lying to do it.

You won that bet on a technicality of my agreeing to calendar year 2004 for simplicity sake. You relied on Agman's data to prove me wrong and you relied on my honesty to admit I was wrong on calendar year 2004 and pay you $100. You didn't contribute a GAWD DAMN THING to the bet. Nothing. Typical of your slimy ways. Yet you have the nerve to claim my original statement was wrong when the same data proved my original statement right.

Being the weasel you are, you play both sides and pick and choose what you want to believe.

How can Agman's data be good enough to prove me wrong on calendar year 2004 but not good enough to prove my original statement right? How does that work Sandbag? I'll tell you how it works, when someone is as brainwashed as you and as biased as you, they will justify anything. You and the "LYING KING" are cut from the same cloth. I wouldn't piss on either of you if you were on fire.

Illusions are not proof! Illusions are illusions and that is all you deal in.

Hahaha! Aren't you the tomcat! Listen to you!

Keep telling yourself while you have $100 that proves my willingness to admit when I'm wrong based on my own research while you question that data when it proves me right. What a counterfeit SOB you are. The end justies the means. Your need to be part of the "good ol packer blamers club" is more important to you than truth. No wonder you have so much free time at work.

~SH~

<blockquote data-quote="Anonymous" data-source="post: 159413">This is a prime example of what an idiot you are.&nbsp; Japan is importing NON TESTED BEEF.&nbsp; Japan is negotiating AGE VERIFICATION.&nbsp; Nothing has been mentioned about testing in Japan&#039;s negotiations with the US yet you insist Japan wants testing.&nbsp; Hahaha!&nbsp; That&#039;s how stupid you are.&nbsp;Oh listen to you little Sandcheska.&nbsp; Like the damn hypocrite you are, you thank Agman for his honesty when Agman said that I was wrong on calendar year 2004.&nbsp; Then you turn around and question Agman&#039;s data when the same data proves my original statement correct.&nbsp; Hahaha! Nothing I can say will prove what a parasite you are more than that.&nbsp; You pick and choose what you want to believe and there is the proof in black and white.The bottom line is this, if the data Agman and I provided was not good enough to prove my original statement right, then it wasn&#039;t good enough to prove me wrong on calendar year 2004 and you should have never accepted the money.&nbsp; But you did because you are nothing but a damn hypocrite just like your sidekick Conman.&nbsp; The end justifies the means and you will justify anything that supports your bias like the counterfeit you are even if it means lying to do it.You won that bet on a technicality of my agreeing to calendar year 2004 for simplicity sake.&nbsp; You relied on Agman&#039;s data to prove me wrong and you relied on my honesty to admit I was wrong on calendar year 2004 and pay you $100.&nbsp; You didn&#039;t contribute a GAWD DAMN THING to the bet.&nbsp; Nothing.&nbsp; Typical of your slimy ways.&nbsp; Yet you have the nerve to claim my original statement was wrong when the same data proved my original statement right.Being the weasel you are, you play both sides and pick and choose what you want to believe.How can Agman&#039;s data be good enough to prove me wrong on calendar year 2004 but not good enough to prove my original statement right?&nbsp; How does that work Sandbag?&nbsp; I&#039;ll tell you how it works, when someone is as brainwashed as you and as biased as you, they will justify anything.&nbsp; You and the &quot;LYING KING&quot; are cut from the same cloth.&nbsp; I wouldn&#039;t piss on either of you if you were on fire.Illusions are not proof!&nbsp; Illusions are illusions and that is all you deal in.Hahaha!&nbsp; Aren&#039;t you the tomcat!&nbsp; Listen to you!Keep telling yourself while you have $100 that proves my willingness to admit when I&#039;m wrong based on my own research while you question that data when it proves me right.&nbsp; What a counterfeit SOB you are.&nbsp; The end justies the means.&nbsp; Your need to be part of the &quot;good ol packer blamers club&quot; is more important to you than truth.&nbsp; No wonder you have so much free time at work.~SH~</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Anonymous, post: 159413"] This is a prime example of what an idiot you are. Japan is importing NON TESTED BEEF. Japan is negotiating AGE VERIFICATION. Nothing has been mentioned about testing in Japan's negotiations with the US yet you insist Japan wants testing. Hahaha! That's how stupid you are. Oh listen to you little Sandcheska. Like the damn hypocrite you are, you thank Agman for his honesty when Agman said that I was wrong on calendar year 2004. Then you turn around and question Agman's data when the same data proves my original statement correct. Hahaha! Nothing I can say will prove what a parasite you are more than that. You pick and choose what you want to believe and there is the proof in black and white. The bottom line is this, [b]if the data Agman and I provided was not good enough to prove my original statement right, then it wasn't good enough to prove me wrong on calendar year 2004 and you should have never accepted the money[/b]. But you did because you are nothing but a damn hypocrite just like your sidekick Conman. The end justifies the means and you will justify anything that supports your bias like the counterfeit you are even if it means lying to do it. You won that bet on a technicality of my agreeing to calendar year 2004 for simplicity sake. You relied on Agman's data to prove me wrong and you relied on my honesty to admit I was wrong on calendar year 2004 and pay you $100. You didn't contribute a GAWD DAMN THING to the bet. Nothing. Typical of your slimy ways. Yet you have the nerve to claim my original statement was wrong when the same data proved my original statement right. Being the weasel you are, you play both sides and pick and choose what you want to believe. How can Agman's data be good enough to prove me wrong on calendar year 2004 but not good enough to prove my original statement right? How does that work Sandbag? I'll tell you how it works, when someone is as brainwashed as you and as biased as you, they will justify anything. You and the "LYING KING" are cut from the same cloth. I wouldn't piss on either of you if you were on fire. Illusions are not proof! Illusions are illusions and that is all you deal in. Hahaha! Aren't you the tomcat! Listen to you! Keep telling yourself while you have $100 that proves my willingness to admit when I'm wrong based on my own research while you question that data when it proves me right. What a counterfeit SOB you are. The end justies the means. Your need to be part of the "good ol packer blamers club" is more important to you than truth. No wonder you have so much free time at work. ~SH~ [/QUOTE]

Verification: What animal is usually the product of a ranch?