• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Cap-and-Trade Sweetheart Deal: Earmarks for Votes?

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Cap-and-Trade Sweetheart Deal: Earmarks for Votes?
Thursday, July 2, 2009 4:18 PM by Mattie Duppler

While the deleterious economic impact of the cap-and-trade bill that passed the House last week is alarming, the manner by which the legislation was passed is equally worrisome. Not surprisingly, we’re now learning more about just how hard Speaker Pelosi worked to sway key Democrat votes, trading pork for support for her job-killing legislation.

The Washington Times reports that Ohio Representative Marcy Kaptur was awarded a $350 billion earmark to subsidize energy projects in her state in exchange for a yes vote on Waxman-Markey. Minority Leader, John Boehner, who also represents Ohio, criticized the pork, stating that Ohio already had a power authority that satisfied the electricity needs of Ohioans. Beyond that, Rep. Kaptur champions her new project as a one that is modeled after the stimulus package which, as we have told you, has failed to do anything it was intended to do.

This comes on the heels of other news that such deals were the catalyst to the passage of the bill. Cap-and-trade is bad policy, but this back-scratching is bad politics. Representatives who are willing to sell their votes are not stewards of their constituents’ interests. What’s more, leadership that will attach any price tag to bills to advance its agenda is a dangerous prospect for Americans – after being forced to bear the burden of failed spending packages and bailouts we should not have to pay to fund Pelosi’s shifty vote deals.

As Congress reconvenes and the Senate moves to take a look at the bill, we will surely hear more about the backroom antics that got cap-and-trade past the House and we will make sure our readers hear about them. But the question remains…this is the most ethical congress in history?

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jul/01/sweetener-helped-sway-vote-on-house-climate-bill/
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
"When Waxman-Markey finally hit the floor, there was no actual bill. Not one single copy of the full legislation that would, hours later, be subject to a final vote was available to members of the House. The text made available to some members of Congress still had 'placeholders' -- blank provisions to be filled in by subsequent language -- including one for the regulation of climate derivatives. ... Even the House Clerk's office lacked a complete copy of the legislation and was forced to place a copy of the 1,200-page draft side-by-side with the 300-page amendments."
 
Top