Randy tell us how could they have made gains on every front when they said in their 2004 fiscal report that their losses in the US plants were only partically offset by the profits in the Lakeside plant in Canada?  Doesn't that mean they lost on at least the US front? Now tell us Randy if you were lossing on one front, a front that has ten plants,  and  one of ways to stop or at least cut the losses was to increase the available supply of cattle by supporting the border openning, would you stand in the way?  Remember Randy the plant in Canada is not making enough to cover the losses in the US plants. Can you really believe that Tyson was against the border opening because of the profit from one plant when their US plants were loosing money?  :roll: