ocm said:For what possible reason? As far as I know no one has requested a postponement.
adventureman said:Cebull is between a rock and hard place. He can't go against the ruling of another court which threw out R-calf's arguments in 40 minutes. On the other hand he can't p*** of the people who elect him. The only thing to do is not have a hearing and he won't make anyone mad.
The order states that upon receipt of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ opinion setting out that court’s reasoning for reversing the District Court’s preliminary injunction, Judge Cebull will determine whether further hearings are necessary.
Sandhusker said:He's not elected, he is appointed.
I take it that Cebull is simply waiting until the Ninth Court makes it's reasons for overturning known. I'm sure attorneys for boths sides need to know what the boys in robes and Birkenstocks are thinking as well.
OCM, youve got a bad attitude towards damn near everythiing havent you?got to learn to get a long like a family on here!!!
ocm said:OCM, youve got a bad attitude towards damn near everythiing havent you?got to learn to get a long like a family on here!!!
All my local friends say exactly the opposite. I actually had a friend tell me this last week how patient I always am with people who "don't get it."
Maybe it's the difference between talking and writing.
And if you are referring to my comment about the Ninth Circuit---it is a well known fact that they have been overturned more by the Supreme Court than any other Circuit Court has.
They have a record of playing fast and loose with the law and with the Constitution and that's why they've been overturned so much. Remember this is the Circuit Court that said that the Pledge of Allegiance was unconstitutional. It is filled with judges of the kind that George W. Bush would not even consider appointing to the Supreme Court. (I should note that there are one or two out of the thirteen judges who aren't too bad.)
My distaste for the Ninth Circuit is not personal--it is political, and it far predated the R-CALF case. The Ninth Circuit has long stood against nearly everything I'm for, and have a bad habit of substituting opinion for law.
CattleCo said:When asked if consumers should continue eating beef after the border opened, Bullard said “Absolutely. We still have the safest beef in the world, but we need to take some additional steps to make it safer.”
DUH DUH DUH!!!
I know how to make it safer!!!! COOK THE DAMM STUFF.....PROPERLY! :roll:
~SH~ said:Don't mind ocm!
He's just upset that the 9th Circuit didn't unanymously agree with R-CULT that our beef was "high risk" since we now have a BSE case in our native herd.
Thank God for science over emotional import blaming isolationists that want to jeoprodize the integrity of the U.S. beef industry with their short sighted views on imports.
Let's see..... "X" has 4 cases, "Y" has 1. "X" has 1/7th the population of "Y"s to produce 4 times the number of cases. Yep, looks like they should be in the same classification to me.....