• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Century War (Agenda 21)

T3023

Well-known member
Project for the New American Century
From SourceWatch

The Project for the New American Century (PNAC) is a neo-conservative think tank with strong ties to the American Enterprise Institute. PNAC's web site says it was "established in the spring of 1997" as "a non-profit, educational organization whose goal is to promote American global leadership."

PNAC's policy document, "Rebuilding America's Defences (http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf)," openly advocates for total global military domination. Many PNAC members hold highest-level positions in the George W. Bush administration.

The Project is an initiative of the New Citizenship Project (501c3).


http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?

title=Project_for_the_New_American_Century

http://www.newamericancentury.org/

Agenda 21

“The Century War,” said the Time Traveler.
“I mean the Century War with Islam,” interrupted the Time Traveler
“You mean the War on Terrorism,” I said.
“I mean the Long War with Islam,” he said. “The Century War.



“The Century War,” said the Time Traveler.
I blinked and tried to remember some history. “You mean the Hundred Year War? Fifteenth Century? Fourteenth? Sometime around there. Between . . . France and England? Henry V? Kenneth Branagh? Or was it . . .”
“I mean the Century War with Islam,” interrupted the Time Traveler. “Your future. Everyone’s.” He was no longer smiling. Without asking, or offering to pour me any, he stood, refilled his Scotch glass, and sat again. He said, “It was important to me to come back to this time early on in the struggle. Even if only to remind myself of how unspeakably blind you all were.”

“You mean the War on Terrorism,” I said.
“I mean the Long War with Islam,” he said. “The Century War. And it’s not over yet where I come from. Not close to being over.”

http://www.dansimmons.com/news/message.htm




CENTURY 21

Agenda 21
 

T3023

Well-known member
Hanta Yo Wrote

Something to be very cognizant about: This scares the h#@* out of me, we need to group together and make a difference!!! Please, please, please make YOUR VOICE HEARD before April 17!!!!! This is just another ploy to get rid of farmers, ranchers, feedlots; anything that creates some dust!! It's absolutely CRAZY!!!!! I will be faxing my copies tonight. I sure don't see R-CALF working on this...

Re: URGENT CALL TO ACTION: Cattle Producers Must Make Their Voices Heard at EPA
______________________________________________________________
In Late January, EPA announced it's proposed rule to regulate particulate matter or dust. With the April 17 deadline for comment submission now just over one week away, WE NEED YOUR SUPPORT! NCBA has requested a deadline extension, but not knowing whether or not this will be granted, NOW is the time that we need to submit our comments opposing this proposal to regulate dust. As is the case on so many environmental issues, there are thousands of activists that will be submitting comments on this rule. While the science of this issue is on our side, WE MUST MAKE OUR VOICES HEARD. Every affiliate organization and all producers need to submit comments to EPA opposing this proposal prior to the APRIL 17, 2006 Submission Deadline!

To help us defeat this unfounded and potentially devastating proposal to regulate dust, we are asking that ALL affiliate organizations submit the set of comments attached below as well as a document containing a letter that Secretary Johanns sent to EPA Administrator Steve Johnson last July and our supporting scientific analysis from Dr. Jonathan Borak. This document is very similar to the actual comments that NCBA will be submitting, and we need each of you to do the same.

1. Please customize the comments attached below to reflect submission by YOUR ORGANIZATION.
<<PM Affiliate Comments 041706.DOC>>

2. Click on http://hill.beef.org/pdfs/SupportingInfoPMAffiliateComments041706.pdf to print off or copy the document containing the letter sent from USDA to EPA and supporting documents from Dr. Jonathan Borak from Yale University.

3. Submit all of the above information to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2001-0017, in any one of the following ways:

http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.

E-mail: [email protected]
Fax: 202-566-1749

Mail: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2001-0017
Environmental Protection Agency
Mailcode:6102T
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20460

While we are asking that all affiliates submit the long version of NCBA's comments attached above, we need each of you to help us generate a large volume of comments to EPA by urging your members to submit the brief comment letter and letter from USDA to EPA attached below. These comments can be submitted in any of the methods outlined above, but it is imperative that producers understand that these comments must be submitted by Monday, April 17, 2006.

Please use every tool at your disposal to get these comments in your producers' hands, and encourage them to submit them immediately. Knowing that there will be thousands of comments received at EPA from our activist opposition on this issue, we need to focus on getting as many people to submit our comments as possible. To help us reach this goal, PLEASE MAKE EVERY EFFORT TO GET AT LEAST 30 PRODUCERS FROM YOUR STATE TO SUBMIT THESE COMMENTS! If we work together, we can ensure that our position is heard loudly by the leaders at EPA!

<<PM Producer Comments 041706.doc>> <<PM Johanns lettter to EPA Administrator 073105.pdf>>
If you have any questions or need further information, feel free to contact me at [email protected] or (202) 347-0228.

************************************************************
Agenda 21`

Environment and Development Agenda
Preamble
Introduction
Combating Poverty
Changing Consumption Patterns
Demographic Dynamics and Sustainability
Protection and Promotion of Human Health
Promoting Sustainable Human Settlement Development
Integrating Environment and Development in Decision-Making
Protection of the Atmosphere
Integrated Approach to the Planning and Management of Land Resources
Combating Deforestation
Managing Fragile Ecosystems: Combating Desertification and Drought
Managing Fragile Ecosystems: Sustainable Mountain Development
Promoting Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development
Conservation of Biological Diversity
Environmentally Sound Management of Biotechnology

PROTECTION OF THE OCEANS, ALL KINDS OF SEAS, INCLUDING ENCLOSED AND SEMI-ENCLOSED SEAS AND COASTAL AREAS AND THE PROTECTION RATIONAL USE AND DEVELOPMENT OF THEIR LIVING RESOURCES

PROTECTION OF THE QUALITY AND SUPPLY OF FRESHWATER RESOURCES: APPLICATION OF INTEGRATED APPROACHES TO THE DEVELOPMENT, MANAGEMENT AND USE OF WATER RESOURCES

Promoting Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development

INTRODUCTION

14.1. By the year 2025, 83 per cent of the expected global population of 8.5 billion will be living in developing countries. Yet the capacity of available resources and technologies to satisfy the demands of this growing population for food and other agricultural commodities remains uncertain. Agriculture has to meet this challenge, mainly by increasing production on land already in use and by avoiding further encroachment on land that is only marginally suitable for cultivation.

14.2. Major adjustments are needed in agricultural, environmental and macroeconomic policy, at both national and international levels, in developed as well as developing countries, to create the conditions for sustainable agriculture and rural development (SARD). The major objective of SARD is to increase food production in a sustainable way and enhance food security. This will involve education initiatives, utilization of economic incentives and the development of appropriate and new technologies, thus ensuring stable supplies of nutritionally adequate food, access to those supplies by vulnerable groups, and production for markets; employment and income generation to alleviate poverty; and natural resource management and environmental protection.

14.3. The priority must be on maintaining and improving the capacity of the higher potential agricultural lands to support an expanding population. However, conserving and rehabilitating the natural resources on lower potential lands in order to maintain sustainable man/land ratios is also necessary. The main tools of SARD are policy and agrarian reform, participation, income diversification, land conservation and improved management of inputs. The success of SARD will depend largely on the support and participation of rural people, national Governments, the private sector and international cooperation, including technical and scientific cooperation.

14.4. The following programme areas are included in this chapter:

(a) Agricultural policy review, planning and integrated programming in the light of the multifunctional aspect of agriculture, particularly with regard to food security and sustainable development;

(b) Ensuring people's participation and promoting human resource development for sustainable agriculture;

(c) Improving farm production and farming systems through diversification of farm and non-farm employment and infrastructure development;

(d) Land-resource planning information and education for agriculture;

(e) Land conservation and rehabilitation;

(f) Water for sustainable food production and sustainable rural development; (g) Conservation and sustainable utilization of plant genetic resources for food and sustainable agriculture;

(h) Conservation and sustainable utilization of animal genetic resources for sustainable agriculture;

(i) Integrated pest management and control in agriculture;

(j) Sustainable plant nutrition to increase food production;

(k) Rural energy transition to enhance productivity;

(l) Evaluation of the effects of ultraviolet radiation on plants and animals caused by the depletion of the stratospheric ozone layer.

PROGRAMME AREAS

A. Agricultural policy review, planning and integrated programmes in the light of the multifunctional aspect of agriculture, particularly with regard to food security and sustainable development

Basis for action

14.5. There is a need to integrate sustainable development considerations with agricultural policy analysis and planning in all countries, particularly in developing countries. Recommendations should contribute directly to development of realistic and operational medium- to long-term plans and programmes, and thus to concrete actions. Support to and monitoring of implementation should follow.

14.6. The absence of a coherent national policy framework for sustainable agriculture and rural development (SARD) is widespread and is not limited to the developing countries. In particular the economies in transition from planned to market-oriented systems need such a framework to incorporate environmental considerations into economic activities, including agriculture. All countries need to assess comprehensively the impacts of such policies on food and agriculture sector performance, food security, rural welfare and international trading relations as a means for identifying appropriate offsetting measures. The major thrust of food security in this case is to bring about a significant increase in agricultural production in a sustainable way and to achieve a substantial improvement in people's entitlement to adequate food and culturally appropriate food supplies.

14.7. Sound policy decisions pertaining to international trade and capital flows also necessitate action to overcome: (a) a lack of awareness of the environmental costs incurred by sectoral and macroeconomic policies and hence their threat to sustainability; (b) insufficient skills and experience in incorporating issues of sustainability into policies and programmes; and (c) inadequacy of tools of analysis and monitoring. 1/

Objectives

14.8. The objectives of this Programme area are:

(a) By 1995, to review and, where appropriate, establish a programme to integrate environmental and sustainable development with policy analysis for the food and agriculture sector and relevant macroeconomic policy analysis, formulation and implementation;

(b) To maintain and develop, as appropriate, operational multisectoral plans, programmes and policy measures, including programmes and measures to enhance sustainable food production and food security within the framework of sustainable development, not later than 1998;

(c) To maintain and enhance the ability of developing countries, particularly the least developed ones, to themselves manage policy, programming and planning activities, not later than 2005.

Activities

(a) Management-related activities

14.9. Governments at the appropriate level, with the support of the relevant international and regional organizations, should:

(a) Carry out national policy reviews related to food security, including adequate levels and stability of food supply and access to food by all households;

(b) Review national and regional agricultural policy in relation, inter alia, to foreign trade, price policy, exchange rate policies, agricultural subsidies and taxes, as well as organization for regional economic integration;

(c) Implement policies to influence land tenure and property rights positively with due recognition of the minimum size of land-holding required to maintain production and check further fragmentation;

(d) Consider demographic trends and population movements and identify critical areas for agricultural production;

(e) Formulate, introduce and monitor policies, laws and regulations and incentives leading to sustainable agricultural and rural development and improved food security and to the development and transfer of appropriate farm technologies, including, where appropriate, low-input sustainable agricultural (LISA) systems;

(f) Support national and regional early warning systems through food-security assistance schemes that monitor food supply and demand and factors affecting household access to food;

(g) Review policies with respect to improving harvesting, storage, processing, distribution and marketing of products at the local, national and regional levels;

(h) Formulate and implement integrated agricultural projects that include other natural resource activities, such as management of rangelands, forests, and wildlife, as appropriate;

(i) Promote social and economic research and policies that encourage sustainable agriculture development, particularly in fragile ecosystems and densely populated areas;

(j) Identify storage and distribution problems affecting food availability; support research, where necessary, to overcome these problems and cooperate with producers and distributors to implement improved practices and systems.

(b) Data and information

14.10. Governments at the appropriate level, with the support of the relevant international and regional organizations, should:

(a) Cooperate actively to expand and improve the information on early warning systems on food and agriculture at both regional and national levels;

(b) Examine and undertake surveys and research to establish baseline information on the status of natural resources relating to food and agricultural production and planning in order to assess the impacts of various uses on these resources, and develop methodologies and tools of analysis, such as environmental accounting.

(c) International and regional cooperation and coordination

14.11. United Nations agencies, such as FAO, the World Bank, IFAD and GATT, and regional organizations, bilateral donor agencies and other bodies should, within their respective mandates, assume a role in working with national Governments in the following activities:

(a) Implement integrated and sustainable agricultural development and food security strategies at the subregional level that use regional production and trade potentials, including organizations for regional economic integration, to promote food security;

(b) Encourage, in the context of achieving sustainable agricultural development and consistent with relevant internationally agreed principles on trade and environment, a more open and non-discriminatory trading system and the avoidance of unjustifiable trade barriers which together with other policies will facilitate the further integration of agricultural and environmental policies so as to make them mutually supportive;

http://www.unep.org/Documents.multilingual/Default.asp?DocumentID=52&ArticleID=
 

T3023

Well-known member
Integrated Approach to the Planning and Management of Land Resources

INTRODUCTION

10.1. Land is normally defined as a physical entity in terms of its topography and spatial nature; a broader integrative view also includes natural resources: the soils, minerals, water and biota that the land comprises. These components are organized in ecosystems which provide a variety of services essential to the maintenance of the integrity of life-support systems and the productive capacity of the environment. Land resources are used in ways that take advantage of all these characteristics. Land is a finite resource, while the natural resources it supports can vary over time and according to management conditions and uses. Expanding human requirements and economic activities are placing ever increasing pressures on land resources, creating competition and conflicts and resulting in suboptimal use of both land and land resources. If, in the future, human requirements are to be met in a sustainable manner, it is now essential to resolve these conflicts and move towards more effective and efficient use of land and its natural resources. Integrated physical and land-use planning and management is an eminently practical way to achieve this. By examining all uses of land in an integrated manner, it makes it possible to minimize conflicts, to make the most efficient trade-offs and to link social and economic development with environmental protection and enhancement, thus helping to achieve the objectives of sustainable development. The essence of the integrated approach finds expression in the coordination of the sectoral planning and management activities concerned with the various aspects of land use and land resources.
 

Red Robin

Well-known member
In lots of ways he reminds me of stevec. I don't know how these guys function in society. A trip to the gas station and they have to wear a flack jacket and take a gas mask with them... :shock:
 

T3023

Well-known member
Red Robin said:
In lots of ways he reminds me of stevec. I don't know how these guys function in society. A trip to the gas station and they have to wear a flack jacket and take a gas mask with them... :shock:



Katrina Posted:
HOW TO DESTROY THE AMERICAN DREAM


We know Dick Lamm as the former Governor of Colorado. In that
context his thoughts are particularly poignant. Last week there was an
immigration overpopulation conference in Washington, DC, filled to capacity
by many of American's finest minds and leaders. A brilliant college
professor by the name of Victor Hansen Davis talked about his latest book,
Mexifornia," explaining how immigration - both legal and illegal - was
destroying the entire state of California. He said it would march across
the country until it destroyed all vestiges of The American Dream.

Moments later, former Colorado Governor Richard D. Lamm stood up and
gave a stunning speech on how to destroy America. The audience sat
spellbound as he described eight methods for the destruction of the United
States. He said, "If you believe that America is too smug, too
self-satisfied, too rich, then let's destroy America. It is not that hard
to do. No nation in history has survived the ravages of time. Arnold
Toynbee observed that all great civilizations rise and fall and that 'An
autopsy of history would show that all great nations commit suicide.'"

Here is how they do it," Lamm said:

"First, to destroy America, turn America into a bilingual or
multi-lingual and bicultural country." History shows that no nation can
survive the tension, conflict, and antagonism of two or more competing
languages and cultures. It is a blessing for an individual to be bilingual;
however, it is a curse for a society to be bilingual. The historical
scholar, Seymour Lipset, put it this way: "The histories of bilingual and
bi-cultural societies that do not assimilate are histories of turmoil,
tension, and tragedy." Canada, Belgium, Mal aysia, and Lebanon all face
crises of national existence in which minorities press for autonomy, if not
independence. Pakistan and Cyprus have divided. Nigeria suppressed an
ethnic rebellion. France faces difficulties with Basques, Bretons, and
Corsicans.".

Lamm went on: Second, to destroy America, "Invent 'multiculturalism'
and encourage immigrants to maintain their culture. I would make it an
article of belief that all cultures are equal. That there are no cultural
differences. I would make it an article of faith that the Black and
Hispanic dropout rates are due solely to prejudice and discrimination by
the majority. Every other explanation is out of bounds.

Third, "We could make the United States an 'Hispanic Quebec' without
much effort. The key is to celebrate diversity rather than unity. As
Benjamin Schwarz said in the Atlantic Monthly recently: "The apparent
success of our own multiethnic and multicultural experiment might have been
achieved not by tolerance but by hegemony. Without the dominance that once
dictated ethnocentricity and what it meant to be an American, we are left
with only tolerance and pluralism to hold us together." Lamm said, "I would
encourage all immigrants to keep their own language and culture. I would
replace the melting pot metaphor with the salad bowl metaphor. It is
important to ensure that we have various cultural subgroups living in
America enforcing their differences rather than as Americans, emphasizing
their similarities."

"Fourth, I would make our fastest growing demographic group the
least educated. I would add a second underclass, unassimilated,
undereducated, and antagonistic to our population. I would have this second
underclass have a 50% dropout rate from high. Sch ool."

"My fifth point for destroying America would be to get big
foundations and business to give these efforts lots of money. I would
invest in ethnic identity, and I would establish the cult of 'Victimology.'
I would get all minorities to think that their lack of success was the
fault of the majority. I would start a grievance industry blaming all
minority failure on the majority population."

"My sixth plan for America's downfall would include dual
citizenship, and promote divided loyalties. I would celebrate diversity
over unity. I would stress differences rather than similarities. Diverse
people worldwide are mostly engaged in hating each other - that is, when
they are not killing each other. A diverse, peaceful, or stable society is
against most historical precedent. People undervalue the unity it takes to
keep a nation together. Look at the ancient Greeks. The Greeks believed
that they belonged to the same race; they possessed a common language and
literature; and they worshipped the same gods. All Greece took part in the
Olympic games. A common enemy, Persia, threatened their liberty. Yet all
these bonds were not strong enough to overcome two factors: local
patriotism and geographical conditions that nurtured political divisions.
Greece fell. "E. Pluribus Unum" -- From many, one. In that historical
reality, if we put the emphasis on the 'pluribus'. Instead of the 'Unum,'
we will balkanize America as surely as Kosovo."

"Next to last, I would place all subjects off limits; make it taboo
to talk about anything against the cult of 'diversity.' I would find a word
similar to 'heretic' in the 16th century - that stopped discussion and
paralyzed thinking. Words like 'racist' or 'xenophobe' halt discussion and
debate. Having made America a bilingual/bicultural co untry, having
established multi-culturism, having the large foundations fund the doctrine
of 'Victimology,' I would next make it impossible to enforce our
immigration laws. I would develop a mantra: That because immigration has
been good for America, it must always be good. I would make every
individual immigrant symmetric and ignore the cumulative impact of millions
of them."

In the last minute of his speech, Governor Lamm wiped his brow.
Profound silence followed. Finally he said,. "Lastly, I would censor Victor
Hanson Davis's book Mexifornia. His book is dangerous. It exposes the plan
to destroy America. If you feel America. deserves to be destroyed, don't
read that book.".

There was no applause. A chilling fear quietly rose like an ominous
cloud above every attendee at the conference. Every American in that room
knew that everything Lamm enumerated was proceeding methodically, quietly,
darkly, yet pervasively across the United States today. Discussion is being
suppressed. Over 100 languages are ripping the foundation of our
educational system and national cohesiveness. Even barbaric cultures that
practice female genital mutilation are growing as we celebrate 'diversity.'
American jobs are vanishing into the Third World as corporations create a
Third World in. America - take note of California and other states - to
date, ten million illegal aliens and growing fast. It is reminiscent of
George Orwell's book "1984." In that story, three slogans are engraved in
the Ministry of Truth building: "War is peace," "Freedom is slavery," and
"Ignorance is strength.".

Governor Lamm walked back to his seat. It dawned on everyone at the
conference that our nation and the future of this great democracy is deeply
in trouble and worsening fast. If we don't get this immigration monster
stopped within three years, it will rage like a California wildfire and
destroy everything in its path, especially The American Dream.

Thought provoking? Send it on !!
:twisted:
 

T3023

Well-known member
Promoting Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development

INTRODUCTION

14.1. By the year 2025, 83 per cent of the expected global population of 8.5 billion will be living in developing countries. Yet the capacity of available resources and technologies to satisfy the demands of this growing population for food and other agricultural commodities remains uncertain. Agriculture has to meet this challenge, mainly by increasing production on land already in use and by avoiding further encroachment on land that is only marginally suitable for cultivation.
***********************************************************

Here they are telling us they are going to take away our rights and responsibilities, because we are not smart enough to do this ourselves. By taking away our rights and responsibilities, that will place us on the other end of the spectrum. Under their Control.

cattle prices
grain prices
land usage
food distribution

The governement is paying your schools at this present time under the pretence of protection. But these are really control points for power and food distribution.

Genesis 47:13-26


************************************************************


14.2. Major adjustments are needed in agricultural, environmental and macroeconomic policy, at both national and international levels, in developed as well as developing countries, to create the conditions for sustainable agriculture and rural development (SARD). The major objective of SARD is to increase food production in a sustainable way and enhance food security. This will involve education initiatives, utilization of economic incentives and the development of appropriate and new technologies, thus ensuring stable supplies of nutritionally adequate food, access to those supplies by vulnerable groups, and production for markets; employment and income generation to alleviate poverty; and natural resource management and environmental protection.
***********************************************************

Here they are saying they are going to use their own technologies, by utilizing their seed, their going to process foods for a commercial market to supply vulnerable groups, which we will become. They are going to take control of the land because we cannot keep the land safe. They are also going to change our food consumption because we do not know how to eat in healthy ways. "You have to read every official document is written from last to first.


employment and income generation to alleviate poverty; and natural resource management and environmental protection.

This actually says they are going to generate income and employment that benefits them and they are going to use environmental resource laws as a means to gain your property (corporate funds using your labor) such as the eminent domain law, and others like this:

Unconstitutional origins of the Endangered Species Act

By redefining Article 6 of the US Constitution, all globlists now have to do is ratify international treaties that, in total, subvert the Constitution and put all power into their hands.


The Endangered Species Act of 1973, the granddaddy of all these anti-human US laws, derives its authority and power from five international treaties, the most prominent being the Western Convention. Section 2, paragraph (4) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 states;

"the United States has pledged itself as a sovereign state in the international community to conserve to the extent practicable the various species of fish or wildlife and plants facing extinction, pursuant to-

and

Re: URGENT CALL TO ACTION: Cattle Producers Must Make Their Voices Heard at EPA
______________________________________________________________
In Late January, EPA announced it's proposed rule to regulate particulate matter or dust. With the April 17 deadline for comment submission now just over one week away, WE NEED YOUR SUPPORT! NCBA has requested a deadline extension, but not knowing whether or not this will be granted, NOW is the time that we need to submit our comments opposing this proposal to regulate dust. As is the case on so many environmental issues, there are thousands of activists that will be submitting comments on this rule. While the science of this issue is on our side, WE MUST MAKE OUR VOICES HEARD. Every affiliate organization and all producers need to submit comments to EPA opposing this proposal prior to the APRIL 17, 2006 Submission Deadline!

***********************************************************

In other words they are going to have so many costly laws placed on ranching and farming, no one will be able to continue to live the American Dream. There going to law you out, smoke you out, burn you out, move you out, price you out...an the list goes on with all their corporate BS.
 
Top