• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

CONGRATS To OT!!!!!!!!

A

Anonymous

Guest
Thank You... She and the family are very excited....

And its still apparent that as far as you, Hypocrit, and a couple of others -- the rules of posting personal information and family info still do not apply... Its bad enough you have to hide behind/use kids and grandkids to badger me-- now you search for info about babies....

Anyone posting personal information about another member with the intent to badger, threaten or intimidate that member will be immediately banned. No other warnings will be given. I realize that this will involve my subjective judgment on a case-by-case basis, so the best advice I can give all of you is DO NOT even come close to violating this guideline. Don't make me have to exercise that judgment. I have much better things to do with my time.

http://ranchers.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=39387


Not surprising tho-- as this is what I have found in dealing with most extremists-- they think the rules/constitution should be one way for other folks-- and another way for them.... [/quote] [/b]
 

Larrry

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
Thank You... She and the family are very excited....

And its still apparent that as far as you, Hypocrit, and a couple of others -- the rules of posting personal information and family info still do not apply... Its bad enough you have to hide behind/use kids and grandkids to badger me-- now you search for info about babies....

Anyone posting personal information about another member with the intent to badger, threaten or intimidate that member will be immediately banned. No other warnings will be given. I realize that this will involve my subjective judgment on a case-by-case basis, so the best advice I can give all of you is DO NOT even come close to violating this guideline. Don't make me have to exercise that judgment. I have much better things to do with my time.



http://ranchers.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=39387


Not surprising tho-- as this is what I have found in dealing with most extremists-- they think the rules/constitution should be one way for other folks-- and another way for them....
[/b][/quote]

Sure wish you had read that before you posted about WW
 

ranch hand

Well-known member
OT all I did was congrat you...I guess that is politically incorrect so I took it back. Do I need to send you a pm and get permission before I post? :???: :roll:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Larrry said:
Oldtimer said:
Thank You... She and the family are very excited....

And its still apparent that as far as you, Hypocrit, and a couple of others -- the rules of posting personal information and family info still do not apply... Its bad enough you have to hide behind/use kids and grandkids to badger me-- now you search for info about babies....

Anyone posting personal information about another member with the intent to badger, threaten or intimidate that member will be immediately banned. No other warnings will be given. I realize that this will involve my subjective judgment on a case-by-case basis, so the best advice I can give all of you is DO NOT even come close to violating this guideline. Don't make me have to exercise that judgment. I have much better things to do with my time.



http://ranchers.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=39387


Not surprising tho-- as this is what I have found in dealing with most extremists-- they think the rules/constitution should be one way for other folks-- and another way for them....
[/b]

Sure wish you had read that before you posted about WW[/quote]

I didn't post about WW-- Buckeye did- (and if he is actually WW like he claims he/they flat broke the rules)...Like I said back when the all the stalking and complaints were made by the ladies--- anything sent to me in a PM will go on the board- because I am not going to sneak around behind anyones backs....

Conversely, falsely accusing another member of such activities is something that we won't tolerate. We take the allegations of stalking seriously, but we also take false allegations seriously. Any of these incidents need to come with some type of proof. If you do not report it to the authorities, do not report it here, either.

I did exactly what the rules said-- reported the allegations to the authorities I figured could best authenticate/use the info-- the US Marshals, the DEA, and the LE information network ....
I did not post any of the personal info I know about WW...[/quote]
 

Mike

Well-known member
I fail to see how Congratulating a member of this board for an upcoming Grandkid is badgering and intimidating. :???: Am I reading a cynical attitude for a Congrats?

We here at Ranchers are proud of our kids and grandkids as I'm sure you are.

Thank You... She and the family are very excited....

It's always good to see everyone excited about a new addition to the family. Especially the Mom & BabyDaddy. :wink:
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
Mike said:
I fail to see how Congratulating a member of this board for an upcoming Grandkid is badgering and intimidating. :???: Am I reading a cynical attitude for a Congrats?

We here at Ranchers are proud of our kids and grandkids as I'm sure you are.

Thank You... She and the family are very excited....

It's always good to see everyone excited about a new addition to the family. Especially the Mom & BabyDaddy. :wink:

BabyDaddy

:lol:
 

Mike

Well-known member
Whitewing said:
I didn't post about WW-- Buckeye did

:lol:

BuckI apparently has access to the old idiot's account.

As I previously stated, a Private Message should be considered expectedly privatecompletely different from the public board here, and not for public consumption, especially if there's Personal information contained within it that the sender does not want everyone to see. No different than a phone call or email.
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
Mike said:
Whitewing said:
I didn't post about WW-- Buckeye did

:lol:

BuckI apparently has access to the old idiot's account.

As I previously stated, a Private Message should be considered expectedly privatecompletely different from the public board here, and not for public consumption, especially if there's Personal information contained within it that the sender does not want everyone to see. No different than a phone call or email.

Well then, I owe everyone an apology for revealing that OT lied to me when he contacted me by telephone. Sorry. :oops:
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
OldBrainFart said:
Like I said back when the all the stalking and complaints were made by the ladies--- anything sent to me in a PM will go on the board- because I am not going to sneak around behind anyones backs....

Uh, excuse me, but if my memory serves me all you did back then was name those who were supposedly doing the stalking but NEVER POSTED a shred of your 'evidence'.

Am I wrong?
 

Mike

Well-known member
Whitewing said:
Mike said:
Whitewing said:
:lol:

BuckI apparently has access to the old idiot's account.

As I previously stated, a Private Message should be considered expectedly privatecompletely different from the public board here, and not for public consumption, especially if there's Personal information contained within it that the sender does not want everyone to see. No different than a phone call or email.

Well then, I owe everyone an apology for revealing that OT lied to me when he contacted me by telephone. Sorry. :oops:
But no one would have expected him NOT to lie. :wink:
 

Mike

Well-known member
Whitewing said:
OldBrainFart said:
Like I said back when the all the stalking and complaints were made by the ladies--- anything sent to me in a PM will go on the board- because I am not going to sneak around behind anyones backs....

Uh, excuse me, but if my memory serves me all you did back then was name those who were supposedly doing the stalking but NEVER POSTED a shred of your 'evidence'.

Am I wrong?

You didn't expect for there to be "Evidence" did you? :???:
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
Mike said:
Whitewing said:
OldBrainFart said:
Like I said back when the all the stalking and complaints were made by the ladies--- anything sent to me in a PM will go on the board- because I am not going to sneak around behind anyones backs....

Uh, excuse me, but if my memory serves me all you did back then was name those who were supposedly doing the stalking but NEVER POSTED a shred of your 'evidence'.

Am I wrong?

You didn't expect for there to be "Evidence" did you? :???:

Mike, do you recall him posting any PM's on the board? All I recall is a bunch of accusations and hot air, zero evidence.
 

Mike

Well-known member
Whitewing said:
Mike said:
Whitewing said:
Uh, excuse me, but if my memory serves me all you did back then was name those who were supposedly doing the stalking but NEVER POSTED a shred of your 'evidence'.

Am I wrong?

You didn't expect for there to be "Evidence" did you? :???:

Mike, do you recall him posting any PM's on the board? All I recall is a bunch of accusations and hot air, zero evidence.

No. But even if he did, I surely wouldn't take them at face value or being genuine. He's lied about a lot less. :shock:
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Mike said:
Whitewing said:
Mike said:
You didn't expect for there to be "Evidence" did you? :???:

Mike, do you recall him posting any PM's on the board? All I recall is a bunch of accusations and hot air, zero evidence.

No. But even if he did, I surely wouldn't take them at face value or being genuine. He's lied about a lot less. :shock:

He should have been banned at that point for trying to intimidate. But Macon chose to ignore the issue at that point, but now OT is most likely advocating for the banning of others...another intimidation tactic that is not surprising to see from him.
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
I have to add...remember all the "you're giving Ranchers a bad name comments"? Well it was OT that was giving Ranchers a bad name and was most likely also the person that had Macon shut down the forum to non-members, because he was then embarrassed about his actions...
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
Of course he's whining to Macon. Why else would the account of poor BuckI who lost all that bail money have been tombstoned?
 
Top