• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Conspiracy Theorists

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Here's the definition of a Conspiracy. By your post R2, I would think you are opposed to "opening your mind", and wondering if some would be willing to come up with a "secret plan", to gain control.

So you are for an audit of the FED, correct? How about large corporations?

Heck you sound like you work for a group connected to the Rothschilds. Transparency, isn't that what Obama proposed? Or are you set to gain financially?

In the name of science, should we not prove "theories" correct or incorrect?

Definition:

1. plan to commit illegal act together: a secret plan or agreement between two or more people to commit an illegal or subversive act

2. making of agreement by conspirators: the making of a secret plan or agreement to commit an illegal or subversive act

3. group of conspirators: a group of people planning or agreeing in secret to commit an illegal or subversive act

[14th century. < Anglo-Norman conspiracie, alteration of Old French conspiration< Latin conspirat-, past participle of conspirare (see conspire)]

R2, can you let us know why there is a raised seal present on one of the pictures presented by FactChek, but clearly not present in the other picture presented?


3. Inability to answer questions. For people who loudly advertise their determination to the principle of questioning everything, they're pretty poor at answering direct questions from sceptics about the claims that they make.
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Reader, were you trying to bring more attention to man-made Global warming with this post?

Sounds like more projection of guilt.

Liberal Conspiracy Theories
Human Events, Jan 12, 2004 by North, Oliver

The Left's Delusional Tour of the 'Twilight Zone'

It's hard to say exactly when the Democrats decisively left the reservation, for the parallel universe that exists only in their own imaginations.

In their world, Bill Clinton was impeached solely because Republicans were "trying to overturn the election;" Al Gore would be president today if only Jeb Bush hadn't stolen the election in Florida; and Osama bin Laden is a CIA operative who orchestrated September 11 to justify the end of civil liberties in the United States.

This litany of conspiracy theories barely scratches the surface of the paranoid mentality that currently infects American liberals.

Liberals have always loved conspiracy theories because raising the specter of foul play and dirty tricks is an easy and convenient justification for ignoring their own political and policy failures.

During the 1980 election, Democrats claimed that Ronald Reagan made a secret pact with Iranian fundamentalists, in order to prolong the hostage crisis and cause Jimmy Carter's support to further hemorrhage.

More recently, leftists attempted to besmirch the Gipper's legacy with the celluloid equivalent of a drive-by shooting-The Reagans-a historically inaccurate made-for-television movie starring Barbra Streisand's husband as Ronald Reagan.

Then there are the persistent conspiracy theories that the CIA or Pentagon generals were responsible for President John Kennedy's assassination. One version of this fanciful myth was brought to the big screen by liberal icon Oliver Stone.

This myth holds that Kennedy was about to withdraw American forces from Vietnam, and thus was targeted for assassination by his own subordinates. Of course, the factual record shows just the opposite, but liberals like Oliver Stone have never been overly concerned with facts.

By the time that Bill Clinton was impeached by the House of Representatives in 1998, Democrats had turned conspiracy theories into a cottage industry. Hillary had gone public with her claim that a "vast right-wing conspiracy" was at work in America, and Bill had suggested that the Oklahoma City bombing was inspired by conservative talk radio hosts.

Clinton's impeachment, they insisted, was the product of a sexual witch-hunt and Republican anger over losing the 1996 presidential election. Democrat pornographer Larry Flynt spent tens of thousands of dollars to gather dirt on Republican congressmen.

Michael Moore insinuated that Big Business was behind this "coup" against Clinton. Even the fact that Bill Clinton admitted that "he knowingly gave evasive and misleading answers" and "engaged in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice" in the Lewinsky case caused the Democrats no pause. Their conspiracy theories rolled on. By 2000, they had Florida to prattle about, and then September 11.

The 9-11 terror attack threw the liberal conspiracy machine into high gear. The final death toll hadn't been confirmed before rumors began that President George W. Bush had advance knowledge of the attacks.

Howard Dean took the story mainstream by declaring, "The most interesting theory that I have heard so far is that (President Bush) was warned ahead of time by the Saudis."

Operation Iraqi Freedom has likewise provided grist for liberal conspiracy stories. Sen. Teddy Kennedy, D-Mass., declared that the whole war was a "fraud made up in Texas."

Rep. Jim McDermott, (D.-Wash.), who a year ago undertook a personal mission to Baghdad before the ground invasion commenced, responded to Saddam's capture by impugning the integrity of the Bush Administration. "I don't know if it was definitely planned on this weekend, but I know they've been in contact with people all along who knew basically where he was," McDermott blabbered to a reporter. "It's funny, when they're having all this trouble, suddenly they have to roll out something."

Instead of condemning McDermott's remarks as flirting with treason, his cynicism about Saddam's capture was joined by other Democrats. Howard Dean, the front-runner for the Democrat presidential nomination, insisted that, "America is not safer because of Saddam's capture." And former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright suggested to Morton Kondracke of Fox News, "Do you suppose that the Bush Administration has Osama bin Laden hidden away somewhere and will bring him out before the election?"

The Democrats' fondness for conspiracy theories has crossed the line into rooting for the other team-all out of spite over President Bush's leadership in the war on terror. Comments like those of McDermott have gone way past Oliver Stone territory and are beginning to ape the rhetoric of Tokyo Rose. With Howard Dean leading their ticket, the Democrats are on track to have a 2004 convention that resembles an episode of the "Twilight Zone."

Col. North (Ret.) is the author of War Stories: Operation Iraqi Freedom (Regnery, a sister publication of HUMAN EVENTS).

Tuesday, May 19, 2009
Liberal Conspiracy Theories
During the presidential debates last year, Obama kept referring to the eeevil oil companies sitting on non-producing leases and how he wanted to tax them for their non-action. His statement made absolutely no sense to me then based on my 20+ years experience with offshore leases in the Gulf of Mexico. It also made no sense from an economic standpoint for the oil companies. But repetition breeds belief and it became accepted that oil companies were screwing us by sitting on leases.

An oil company pays big money for the privilege to gamble that there is oil down there. They don't want to see that investment wasted and usually need the cash flow it can generate. It's just too valuable to sit on as long as the price of oil is reasonable. Also, the Mineral Management Service gives companies a fixed period of time to "use it or lose it". If there is no activity on a lease, they will take it back. I have seen managers jump through hoops to prevent that from happening as it is a black mark on their records to have to return a potential asset. Of course, there are those leases that are deemed "dry" and are allowed to revert to the government.

In fact, Obama put in 122 million dollars in revenue in his budget for from fees collected for non-producing leases. But now we know that for all the talk about non-producing leases, the government has no clear definition of what constitutes a non-producing lease. Secretary of Interior Salazar told the House Interior Appropriations Subcommittee that the DOI had no clear definition of a non-producing lease.

The story is here.

So, if there is no clear definition of a non-producing lease, how can Obama claim there are hundreds of them costing the taxpayer dearly and how can he propose to tax them????

http://peripateticengineer.blogspot.com/2009/05/liberal-conspiracy-theories.html
 

MoGal

Well-known member
A couple of years ago, I realized congress was no longer serving the people and I wanted to know who was tearing down my country, for what reason and why.

Many groups have conspired against the people to bring about their luciferian new world order. You don't hear of true bible believing Jesus Christ Christians going around slitting someone's throat if they won't convert, nor do we wish to control people through food, water and supplies, nor do we make human viruses for population control, nor have we planned any world wars (read Albert Pike, "Morals and Dogma"), nor do all Christian families own the central banks, major corporations and majority stock in the major corporations, etc, etc.. etc... but there is a group out there that does.

I read last week that the Obama healthcare bill (Section 21 and it gave the exact numbers/letters so I need to go find it again) allows for microchipping of people.... I guess that's just a conspiracy too???

I tell you, 28% of the Bible is prophecy and if God didn't tell us what was coming, I'd be scared to death. But because he tells us I have no fear, because I know God has it all under control. Now that doesn't mean that Christians be silent..... NO, it means we need to speak up and stand up for what is morally right. We cannot be silent any longer.

Its spiritual warfare Reader, the unsaved don't know what's happening but God has removed his hand from the USA. When God removed his hand, it allows the devil to roam seeking those whom he may devour. The coming calamities that will be upon the USA will give Christians an opportunity to witness for the Lord. Christians must start standing up and speaking up. Read the story of Moses and Aaron when they went to Egypt to get the Israelites out of bondage.... Egypt has always been involved in the occult and satanic worship. Moses asked Pharoah to let the Israelites go and he laughed at Moses. You see with witchcraft they could make the waters turn red just like Moses, they could make snakes out of a stick (however do note that and there's only one sentence on it that Moses snake ate the other snakes. Their snakes couldn't eat Mose's snake.) But they couldn't match the 10 plagues that God brought upon them. Pharoah refused to let them go until the 10th plague which took the oldest child of everyone in Egypt. Do you know where the Israelites were during all this??? They were in Goatia (sp??) They were untouched. The true Christians, those who are diligently seeking God's word, obedient to God, trying to live a Godly life, tithing, and witnessing to others will be living in Goatia and the unsaved will be in Egypt. I truly believe that. The angels came for Lot and his wife because God would not destroy Sodom and Gomorrah until they left. God is not going to allow his children to be in a pit by ourselves.... if nothing else I'll be like Meshack, Shadrack and Abednego until God takes me home.

I tell you as I've been telling many of my close friends, christians are gonna have to become prayer warriors. God says he gives us power (we have the power to defeat satan through the blood of Jesus Christ and we must start binding him (satan) in the name of Jesus, by the blood of Jesus over our home, our families (because I'm not leaving any of my loved ones behind), our country and our government. God says he gives us love (we are to show others the love of Jesus Christ) and a sound mind (the Holy Spirit is within us and we need to recognize when the devil gives us a thought that isn't godly).

The new world order isn't new nor will it be orderly. Nimrod tried it and God came down and confused the languages and the tower of Babel immediately became the tower of Babble because no one could understand the other. Since satan cannot control when he gets to arise, he's always maintained someone in the wings and the only way satan can get anything done is in God's timing and God only allows it so that it completely fulfills Bible prophecy.

God originates and satan can only duplicate.......... God has the 12 tribes of Israel and Jesus, Satan has the 12 bloodlines (are these the nephilim of Genesis 6??) and the 13th bloodline, Merovingian bloodline is supposed to descend directly from satan, God has the trinity (the Father, son and holy ghost), Satan has the beast, false prophet and the antichrist, God used astronomy, satan has astrology ........... and the list goes on. Every time God said Jesus was coming through a certain bloodline, satan would go there and try to dilute the gene pool so it would not be pure. One of the reasons God chose Noah because he was "pure" meaning that his bloodline had not been infiltrated with the nephilim. When God flooded the earth, he wiped out the nephilim and they had to start over.


God told Daniel to close up the book until the end of time and I think we're almost there because knowledge is increasing and there's so much more understood about the Bible. Anytime you read something search it out in the Bible and if it doesn't match up with God's word then throw it out. Remember, if someone quotes a passage, if need be, read the entire chapter or even the chapter before it to make sure you understand it in the right context.

One needs to look at the occult to see what they believe, occult numerology (so you can understand what numbers are important to them because they do things on occult number days believing they increase their satanic power).

This is a good video for all Christians to see: http://www.findinternettv.com/Videos/2305843009986093049.aspx
and part II is a link to the left of it. All Americans should see the first ten minutes of it to see the meaning of the symbols of our money. I guarantee you it isn't in our public history books anywhere.

Milton William "Bill" Cooper in his book, "Behold a Pale Horse" lists who the groups are pushing a new world order (but he has it wrong about the UFO's I think because the government has had the saucer technology for over 60 years and I wonder if they won't use the excuse that UFO's have taken people (Christians who are raptured plus the children who have not reached the age of accountability - can you imagine an unsaved parent looking for their child who has disappeared and also think about it the world will be totally immoral and corrupt (we're getting close to it now). In the USA alone, that could be 30-50 million people gone.

In fact, the new age religion (westernized form of eastern mysticism) is already telling people that some will be taken away (are they gonna tell people UFO's got them???) to be "reformed" and will return at a later time......... oooo they got that right, we'll be returning riding white horses with our Lord and Savior at the lead.

The only reason Homeland Security has people on the right wing extremist list because they read the Bible is because its all falling in place just like God says it will. In Doc Marquis part II, he says we'll be made out to be "right wing religious kooks" and when he said that I busted a gut because we are there now. Look at all the blogs where someone says something about Jesus Christ........ the negative, nasty and cursing responses that person gets.

As Bill Cooper said, "It doesn't matter whether you believe it or not, it's whether the illumanati believe it and if they do, it will affect your life".
Here's the book if you want to read it: http://www.scribd.com/doc/13208373/Behold-a-Pale-HorseWilliam-Cooper

and then do a search on scrbd for Eustace Mullins book, "world order" (a few of the links I checked said the book had been deleted but I know there's bound to be one that is there).

While George Orwell's books, "1984" and "Animal Farm" are becoming a reality right before our very eyes, I find it laughable that anyone could toot their horn at "conspiracy". Maybe we should ask ourselves how much "coincidence" are we willing to accept.

When do people start drawing the line and say they will no longer sacrifice/compromise their morals, character and integrity????

When do people start drawing the line and tell their congressional leaders, "if you vote for that bill, I'm going to vote against you in the next election" (and we need to make sure Diebold doesn't vote them in).
 
Top