MsSage said:Then WHY post it HERE??????
Would this NOT be better posted in coffee shop?
burnt said:MsSage said:Then WHY post it HERE??????
Would this NOT be better posted in coffee shop?
You believed her??
alice said:burnt said:MsSage said:Then WHY post it HERE??????
Would this NOT be better posted in coffee shop?
You believed her??
You didn't?
burnt said:alice said:burnt said:You believed her??
You didn't?
Why Alice, what a sweetheart you are, believing everythang that r2 says!
Bless your heart!
alice said:burnt said:alice said:You didn't?
Why Alice, what a sweetheart you are, believing everythang that r2 says!
Bless your heart!
So, what is there to not believe in regard to this post?
badaxemoo said:alice said:burnt said:Why Alice, what a sweetheart you are, believing everythang that r2 says!
Bless your heart!
So, what is there to not believe in regard to this post?
Clearly God did not create a "fanged frog".
The God that invented Capitalism, guides Glenn Beck's oratory on a daily basis, and created the rainbow, eagle, puppy and unicorn would never make something as silly as a "fanged frog".
Clearly this "fanged frog" is the work of an evolutionist intent upon discrediting the Bible.
They probably captured some poor little hopper and super-glued rattlesnake fangs into his mouth.
alice said:badaxemoo said:alice said:So, what is there to not believe in regard to this post?
Clearly God did not create a "fanged frog".
The God that invented Capitalism, guides Glenn Beck's oratory on a daily basis, and created the rainbow, eagle, puppy and unicorn would never make something as silly as a "fanged frog".
Clearly this "fanged frog" is the work of an evolutionist intent upon discrediting the Bible.
They probably captured some poor little hopper and super-glued rattlesnake fangs into his mouth.
Oh, I didn't look at it like that.
I did, however, go to the website and saw some really cool pics...wanted to take a look at a rat that was bigger than the dang things we have around here...and none of the pictures looked photoshopped or superglued. Nah, I think this is the real deal here. 8) :lol:
I believe!!!!!
Alice
So, what is there to not believe in regard to this post?
hypocritexposer said:So, what is there to not believe in regard to this post?
first off Alice, you need to figure out if you are believing the posters intentions or the details in the article.
Badaxe did not seem to "believe" the poster either, or he would not have taken the discussion in a political direction, or he just did not respect her wishes.
MsSage seems to be in PB, to discuss politics, and Burnt seems to believe that R2's intentions were to take it in a direction much like Badaxe chose to take it.
This seems to be a problem for some in PB. You consistently confuse the intentions of the poster, with whether the article is factual or not.
hypocritexposer said:Badaxe did not seem to "believe" the poster either, or he would not have taken the discussion in a political direction, or he just did not respect her wishes.
hypocritexposer said:and once again Badaxe and Alice show their true intentions of being on PB.
How quickly they attack.
badaxemoo said:hypocritexposer said:Badaxe did not seem to "believe" the poster either, or he would not have taken the discussion in a political direction, or he just did not respect her wishes.
I believed Reader.
She, unlike you, seems to be a real person with sincere beliefs.
How could finding new species possibly be controversial?
hypocritexposer said:badaxemoo said:hypocritexposer said:Badaxe did not seem to "believe" the poster either, or he would not have taken the discussion in a political direction, or he just did not respect her wishes.
I believed Reader.
She, unlike you, seems to be a real person with sincere beliefs.
How could finding new species possibly be controversial?
you used it as an opportunity to attack a religion and who they listen to on tv, did you not?
you made it controversial.
Alice did not, until I posted. Then she attacked.
alice said:hypocritexposer said:So, what is there to not believe in regard to this post?
first off Alice, you need to figure out if you are believing the posters intentions or the details in the article.
Badaxe did not seem to "believe" the poster either, or he would not have taken the discussion in a political direction, or he just did not respect her wishes.
MsSage seems to be in PB, to discuss politics, and Burnt seems to believe that R2's intentions were to take it in a direction much like Badaxe chose to take it.
This seems to be a problem for some in PB. You consistently confuse the intentions of the poster, with whether the article is factual or not.
First off, you need to be able to comprehend what I've written well enough to detect humor and/or sarcasm...depending on whom I've directed my response to.
Second...is English your first language?
Third...bite me!
Alice
badaxemoo said:hypocritexposer said:Badaxe did not seem to "believe" the poster either, or he would not have taken the discussion in a political direction, or he just did not respect her wishes.
I believed Reader.
She, unlike you, seems to be a real person with sincere beliefs.
How could finding new species possibly be controversial?
burnt said:badaxemoo said:hypocritexposer said:Badaxe did not seem to "believe" the poster either, or he would not have taken the discussion in a political direction, or he just did not respect her wishes.
I believed Reader.
She, unlike you, seems to be a real person with sincere beliefs.
How could finding new species possibly be controversial?
Oh badaxe, you really are a comical fellow!
Based on your words quoted above, if a person shares your personal viewpoints, they are sincere and real.
So conversely, are you saying that anyone else in insincere and not a person of real value? Just someone else's automaton, robot, clone?
Surely you are not that shallow!! :shock: