• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Cool Article -- No Political Message Intended

badaxemoo

Well-known member
alice said:
burnt said:
alice said:
You didn't?

Why Alice, what a sweetheart you are, believing everythang that r2 says!

Bless your heart!

So, what is there to not believe in regard to this post?

Clearly God did not create a "fanged frog".

The God that invented Capitalism, guides Glenn Beck's oratory on a daily basis, and created the rainbow, eagle, puppy and unicorn would never make something as silly as a "fanged frog".

Clearly this "fanged frog" is the work of an evolutionist intent upon discrediting the Bible.

They probably captured some poor little hopper and super-glued rattlesnake fangs into his mouth.
 

alice

Well-known member
badaxemoo said:
alice said:
burnt said:
Why Alice, what a sweetheart you are, believing everythang that r2 says!

Bless your heart!

So, what is there to not believe in regard to this post?

Clearly God did not create a "fanged frog".

The God that invented Capitalism, guides Glenn Beck's oratory on a daily basis, and created the rainbow, eagle, puppy and unicorn would never make something as silly as a "fanged frog".

Clearly this "fanged frog" is the work of an evolutionist intent upon discrediting the Bible.

They probably captured some poor little hopper and super-glued rattlesnake fangs into his mouth.

Oh, I didn't look at it like that.

I did, however, go to the website and saw some really cool pics...wanted to take a look at a rat that was bigger than the dang things we have around here...and none of the pictures looked photoshopped or superglued. Nah, I think this is the real deal here. 8) :lol:

I believe!!!!!

Alice
 

burnt

Well-known member
alice said:
badaxemoo said:
alice said:
So, what is there to not believe in regard to this post?

Clearly God did not create a "fanged frog".

The God that invented Capitalism, guides Glenn Beck's oratory on a daily basis, and created the rainbow, eagle, puppy and unicorn would never make something as silly as a "fanged frog".

Clearly this "fanged frog" is the work of an evolutionist intent upon discrediting the Bible.

They probably captured some poor little hopper and super-glued rattlesnake fangs into his mouth.

Oh, I didn't look at it like that.

I did, however, go to the website and saw some really cool pics...wanted to take a look at a rat that was bigger than the dang things we have around here...and none of the pictures looked photoshopped or superglued. Nah, I think this is the real deal here. 8) :lol:

I believe!!!!!

Alice

Ah, sister! Spoken like a true Christian! You have faith!
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
So, what is there to not believe in regard to this post?

first off Alice, you need to figure out if you are believing the posters intentions or the details in the article.

Badaxe did not seem to "believe" the poster either, or he would not have taken the discussion in a political direction, or he just did not respect her wishes.

MsSage seems to be in PB, to discuss politics, and Burnt seems to believe that R2's intentions were to take it in a direction much like Badaxe chose to take it.

This seems to be a problem for some in PB. Consistently judging the intentions of the poster, on whether you believe the article is factual or not.
 

alice

Well-known member
hypocritexposer said:
So, what is there to not believe in regard to this post?

first off Alice, you need to figure out if you are believing the posters intentions or the details in the article.

Badaxe did not seem to "believe" the poster either, or he would not have taken the discussion in a political direction, or he just did not respect her wishes.

MsSage seems to be in PB, to discuss politics, and Burnt seems to believe that R2's intentions were to take it in a direction much like Badaxe chose to take it.

This seems to be a problem for some in PB. You consistently confuse the intentions of the poster, with whether the article is factual or not.

First off, you need to be able to comprehend what I've written well enough to detect humor and/or sarcasm...depending on whom I've directed my response to.

Second...is English your first language?

Third...bite me!

Alice
 

badaxemoo

Well-known member
hypocritexposer said:
Badaxe did not seem to "believe" the poster either, or he would not have taken the discussion in a political direction, or he just did not respect her wishes.

I believed Reader.

She, unlike you, seems to be a real person with sincere beliefs.

How could finding new species possibly be controversial?
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
badaxemoo said:
hypocritexposer said:
Badaxe did not seem to "believe" the poster either, or he would not have taken the discussion in a political direction, or he just did not respect her wishes.

I believed Reader.

She, unlike you, seems to be a real person with sincere beliefs.

How could finding new species possibly be controversial?

you used it as an opportunity to attack a religion and who they listen to on tv, did you not?

you made it controversial.

Alice did not, until I posted. Then she attacked.
 

alice

Well-known member
hypocritexposer said:
badaxemoo said:
hypocritexposer said:
Badaxe did not seem to "believe" the poster either, or he would not have taken the discussion in a political direction, or he just did not respect her wishes.

I believed Reader.

She, unlike you, seems to be a real person with sincere beliefs.

How could finding new species possibly be controversial?

you used it as an opportunity to attack a religion and who they listen to on tv, did you not?

you made it controversial.

Alice did not, until I posted. Then she attacked.

Attacked what?

Badaxe, isn't it wonderful that we have someone here who likes to "interpret" what we really, really mean?

Speaking of interpret...you didn't answer my question. Is English your first language?

Alice
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
alice said:
hypocritexposer said:
So, what is there to not believe in regard to this post?

first off Alice, you need to figure out if you are believing the posters intentions or the details in the article.

Badaxe did not seem to "believe" the poster either, or he would not have taken the discussion in a political direction, or he just did not respect her wishes.

MsSage seems to be in PB, to discuss politics, and Burnt seems to believe that R2's intentions were to take it in a direction much like Badaxe chose to take it.

This seems to be a problem for some in PB. You consistently confuse the intentions of the poster, with whether the article is factual or not.

First off, you need to be able to comprehend what I've written well enough to detect humor and/or sarcasm...depending on whom I've directed my response to.

Second...is English your first language?

Third...bite me!

Alice

exactly, attack what or whom?
 

burnt

Well-known member
badaxemoo said:
hypocritexposer said:
Badaxe did not seem to "believe" the poster either, or he would not have taken the discussion in a political direction, or he just did not respect her wishes.

I believed Reader.

She, unlike you, seems to be a real person with sincere beliefs.

How could finding new species possibly be controversial?

Oh badaxe, you really are a comical fellow!

Based on your words quoted above, if a person shares your personal viewpoints, they are sincere and real.

So conversely, are you saying that anyone else in insincere and not a person of real value? Just someone else's automaton, robot, clone?

Surely you are not that shallow!! :shock:
 

Clarencen

Well-known member
I found Readers post interesting, but the last sentence bothered me. If she would have posted it on Coffee Shop it would not have.

I was on ranchers Net when Reader came on board. This was when BSE was the hot topic. Her husband had died from a terrible decease. She was angry and wanted someone or something to blame. She wanted to make us who were on Ranchers Net feel guilty. The last sentence of that article is trying to do the same.
Reader has told us that she has a six figure income. I do not, I suspect a lot of posters on here do not either. I do not envy her for that, nor should I. Does that make her feel guilty? Again it shouldn't, she has earned it.

I have no problems with R2's posts. She has her own opinions, beliefs, and convictions, I respect them even if I do not always agree. I hope she keeps on posting here.

I am on Rancher net to gain knowledge. I express my opinions to keep things going. I do not care if I am proven wrong.
 

badaxemoo

Well-known member
burnt said:
badaxemoo said:
hypocritexposer said:
Badaxe did not seem to "believe" the poster either, or he would not have taken the discussion in a political direction, or he just did not respect her wishes.

I believed Reader.

She, unlike you, seems to be a real person with sincere beliefs.

How could finding new species possibly be controversial?

Oh badaxe, you really are a comical fellow!

Based on your words quoted above, if a person shares your personal viewpoints, they are sincere and real.

So conversely, are you saying that anyone else in insincere and not a person of real value? Just someone else's automaton, robot, clone?

Surely you are not that shallow!! :shock:

Not at all.

I have no doubts that you, Sandhusker, MsSage, Big Muddy, Tam, and nearly everyone else who sometimes inhabits this forum are real and generally sincere.

I think you know exactly who my remarks are meant for.
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Don't worry your little head Badaxe, I've had a company offer me a job that might be hard to turn down, it might be worth coming out of retirement for.

If I decide to take the person up on their offer, the time available to post will be limited, to outside of work hours.

So not as many of the articles that you so often discuss, or opportunity to personally attack the poster with your false accusations and assumptions.

I sure hope you based your past arrests on more evidence than you have convicted me with.

You are truly sincere/genuine. Sincere intentions.
 
Top