• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Criminal Prosecution?

PORKER

Well-known member
Simply put, anyone, or any agency that states that animals younger than 20 months cannot be tested for BSE because of the age of the animal is basically lying through their collective shorts!!! Urine can be tested for the presence of the infectious prion and age is not a factor. It is generally believed that because of the age of the animal, it is impossible to test and get a favorable result. Not true. Age is only a factor in the accepted protocol that states that animals under the age of 30 months generally do not display symptoms of BSE and therefore most of the testing for many years was concentrated on older animals. Just because an animal doesn't display symptoms doesn't automatically give that animal a clean bill of health!!***YOU ARE RIGHT

The BASIC Packer ,Meat Merchant,and Government LINE is COVER IT UP and DISTORT THE TRUTH. WE still need BSE free HERDS to have a HEALTHY CATTLE herd.We need this BSE URINE TEST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Porker knows more about BSE testing than the agency taxed with the responsibility for the safety of our food in the United States. Isn't that amazing?

If this test will do what you say it will porker, why does the government refuse to approve it?

There must be a reason because I highly doubt that you know more about this issue than USDA's best scientists.



~SH~
 

Econ101

Well-known member
~SH~ said:
Porker knows more about BSE testing than the agency taxed with the responsibility for the safety of our food in the United States. Isn't that amazing?

If this test will do what you say it will porker, why does the government refuse to approve it?

There must be a reason because I highly doubt that you know more about this issue than USDA's best scientists.



~SH~

The question is being handled by political appointees, not by the scientists, SH.

Here is a question for you, SH: If you can weasel around and have a comeback with almost any question, why aren't you smart enough to be more than a gopher trapper? Could it be that you don't know how to answer questions being asked and instead divert the question so that you can give an answer you want?

I was watching the show Arthur on PBS with my daughter (yes I do watch her little shows with her from time to time) and they had an episode where DW, Arthur's little sister, had science set up where she explained why everything was the way it was. To give you just one example of her reasoning, she asked, "Why is the sky blue?" Her answer (and I am paraphrasing) was that green was taken by the grass already, brown was taken by tree, and white was taken by the clouds so the sky had to be blue.

I often think your reasoning is on the level of DW, SH.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Blah, blah, blah!

I suppose that would explain your inability to refute anything I have stated with facts to the contrary huh?

In contrast, a chickensh*t like you lies in virtually every post you make and refuses to identify yourself because you dont want anyone to know who the biggest liar on the forum is. Can't say I blame you!


~SH~
 

Econ101

Well-known member
~SH~ said:
Blah, blah, blah!

I suppose that would explain your inability to refute anything I have stated with facts to the contrary huh?

In contrast, a chickensh*t like you lies in virtually every post you make and refuses to identify yourself because you dont want anyone to know who the biggest liar on the forum is. Can't say I blame you!


~SH~

Can you prove ANYTHING you just said?
 

Latest posts

Top