• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Dare one call it treason?

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Dare one call it treason?
by LAWRENCE SELLIN, PHD July 18, 2014



The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody had decided not to see - Ayn Rand

Many Americans believe that the US Government, the Democrat and Republican Parties and the media are deliberately misleading the American people, hiding the most heinous fraud and Constitutional crisis in the history of the United States.

Individuals at the highest levels of the federal government may have aided and abetted a deception, which included willful ignorance, misinformation, false interpretations of the Constitution, outright lies and the creation of fraudulent documents and computer records to protect an ineligible, ill-prepared and unworthy candidate for the office of President of the United States.

In the age of Obama we have witnessed the complete metamorphosis of the media, no longer objective journalists, but partisan liberal activists, who control, manipulate, even create news to support a left-wing political agenda.

On April 27, 2011, Barack Obama presented as his official birth certificate a digital image so riddled with anomalies that only counterfeiters or the complicit could vouch for its authenticity.

Evidence has been reported claiming that Barack Obama has been using a fraudulent Connecticut Social Security Number (SSN) since at least 1986. That number, 042-68-4425, issued in 1977, was set aside exclusively for Connecticut residents, a state in which he never lived nor did any member of his immediate family. In addition, SSN Verifier Plus showed the birth year 1890 linked to that number. Because SSNs are not re-issued, multiple birth dates for one card suggest a stolen number.

The data and documents associated with Obama's Selective Service registration also contain inconsistencies. Most noticeably, Obama's registration card has a two digit year ‘80" on the postal stamp, unlike the four digit year stamp "1980" found on all other registration cards completed at the same time in Hawaii and other states. It appears that a 2008 postal stamp was cut, the 08 inverted and reinserted into the stamp to mimic a 1980 registration. Interestingly, Obama's SSN 042-68-4425 appears on his 1980 Selective Service registration, which is six years before that number can be found in personal background databases.

I believe that Barack Obama did not register with the Selective Service in 1980 because he was attending Occidental College in a foreign student status and in 1981 traveled to Pakistan using an Indonesian passport. According to the law, failure to register with the Selective Service would forever prevent Obama from working in the executive branch of the US government.

One could readily conclude that Obama lied and flouted the law to get elected. It should come as no surprise then, that he would lie and flout the law to implement his policies.

I believe Obama succeeded in 2008 because the Republicans struck a deal with the Democrats not to question Obama's eligibility for office and his personal history. Furthermore, the liberal media took radical steps to protect their favored candidate, killing negative stories about Obama and even threatening to accuse his opponents of racism in order to make them "sputter with rage, which in turn leads to overreaction and self-destruction."

In addition to the apparent creation of fraudulent documents and the doctoring of computer records by Obama supporters, then Democratic National Chair Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) prepared two different Certifications of Nomination, an action unprecedented in US history, presumably to hide Obama's ineligibility for office.

And so committed has the liberal media been to protect their investment in Obama, they continue to dispense with gusto misinformation, disinformation or no information.

The conspiracy of silence continues out of complicity or fear. The political-media establishment realizes that if the truth is told about Barack Obama the system from which they accrue enormous personal power and profit will collapse.

Republicans will oppose Obama, but they will not expose him because, by doing so, it will reveal their own dereliction of duty. Many believe, and with reasonable cause, that all the hearings and law suits conducted by the Republicans are a subterfuge meant to run out the clock.

It doesn't matter if Obama thinks he is right or if he thinks he is being virtuous. The policies he is pursuing are destroying the country. Even if one rejects treachery or treason as motives, the unrealistic and impractical far-left liberalism promoted by Obama and his acolytes is an inevitable march from altruistic dreams to coercion, oppression and, ultimately, failure.

You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality - Ayn Rand

Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is a retired colonel with 29 years of service in the US Army Reserve and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq. Colonel Sellin is the author of "Restoring the Republic: Arguments for a Second American Revolution ".

Read more: Family Security Matters http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/print/dare-one-call-it-treason#ixzz3A2gs7lkK
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
 

loomixguy

Well-known member
But somebody here is far more worried about Bush & Cheney lining their pockets with help from Halliburton.....which has never been proved, when he should have been more worried about vetting the candidate he proudly voted for.
 

Brad S

Well-known member
I asked a family member who is a retired military document eval spook about the legitimacy of the Obama birth certificate. He seemed nervous and wouldn't discuss anything about the document, and abruptly left my parent's house. The thing I found most disconcerting is the way avoided the issue like we lived in Stalinist Russia.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Brad S said:
I asked a family member who is a retired military document eval spook about the legitimacy of the Obama birth certificate. He seemed nervous and wouldn't discuss anything about the document, and abruptly left my parent's house. The thing I found most disconcerting is the way avoided the issue like we lived in Stalinist Russia.

You scared him--probably ran him off hoping that type paranoia and insanity didn't run too deep in the family... :wink:



I believe Obama succeeded in 2008 because the Republicans struck a deal with the Democrats not to question Obama's eligibility for office and his personal history.

I know I need to invest more in Reynolds aluminum stock-- the tinfoil hat wearers are multiplying fast again :roll: :wink: :p :lol: :lol:
 

hopalong

Well-known member
here this will help you out in your purchse
http://content.tradeking.com/trading/stocks-options/online-brokerage.php?ADTRK=SMS0912GENPriorityDiscount_BrokersBroad-BMMT0248&PV=D000-G001-Q001-R004&ADV=B&ADID={creative}&c3apiks=3378_32975
doubt you ever owned any
 

Mike

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
Brad S said:
I asked a family member who is a retired military document eval spook about the legitimacy of the Obama birth certificate. He seemed nervous and wouldn't discuss anything about the document, and abruptly left my parent's house. The thing I found most disconcerting is the way avoided the issue like we lived in Stalinist Russia.

You scared him--probably ran him off hoping that type paranoia and insanity didn't run too deep in the family... :wink:



I believe Obama succeeded in 2008 because the Republicans struck a deal with the Democrats not to question Obama's eligibility for office and his personal history.

I know I need to invest more in Reynolds aluminum stock-- the tinfoil hat wearers are multiplying fast again :roll: :wink: :p :lol: :lol:

There is little doubt about who I would be name-calling concerning the original post and OT's opinion on the matter.

Do you believe a washed up grotesquely obese Deputy Sheriff in a podunk town with a large number of lies under his belt? Or an obviously Patriotic Colonel with the U.S. Military for 29 years that possesses a PHD and has clearly done his homework?

The two strangely different "Certifications Of Nomination" made by Nancy Pelosi is reason enough alone to question a cover up of by the Democratic Party.

One says that Buckwheat is legally qualified for the nomination and one doesn't say that at all. It only says that he was nominated. :lol:
 

Steve

Well-known member
Brad S said:
I asked a family member who is a retired military document eval spook about the legitimacy of the Obama birth certificate. He seemed nervous and wouldn't discuss anything about the document, and abruptly left my parent's house. The thing I found most disconcerting is the way avoided the issue like we lived in Stalinist Russia.

as ex military myself,..I can understand his discomfort.. if the military inner circles know the truth,.. they would also understand the Constitutional crises that would bring..

I still remember the words,.. "I can neither confirm nor deny.... "
if we had to say something that was what we could and were encouraged to say.. but often we knew it was better to just keep our mouths shut and find another place to sit or stand...
 

Brad S

Well-known member
Steve, I think you're pretty close.
I used to suspect the obviously flawed birth certificate was a crafty plot to set us about following the wrong trail.
 

littlejoe

Well-known member
loomixguy said:
But somebody here is far more worried about Bush & Cheney lining their pockets with help from Halliburton.....which has never been proved, when he should have been more worried about vetting the candidate he proudly voted for.

Ya, war criminals do tend to bring out adverse reactions, don't they?
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
littlejoe said:
loomixguy said:
But somebody here is far more worried about Bush & Cheney lining their pockets with help from Halliburton.....which has never been proved, when he should have been more worried about vetting the candidate he proudly voted for.

Ya, war criminals do tend to bring out adverse reactions, don't they?

Except from you and OT, when it is a Democrat, that is the same "war-criminal" as you claim Bush to be.
 

Latest posts

Top