Mike said:The FBI has a new flyer alerting for "Defenders of the Constitution" and categorizing them blatantly with terrorists, etc.
Classifying them as "Right Wing Extremists".
http://www.retakingamerica.com/files/fbi_flyer.pdf
Mike said:In simplistic terms, someone who is a per se "Defender of the Constitution" should in no way be deemed an outlaw or be included in any watch list...........................especially when self-described and professed "Communists" have a free rein to infiltrate whatever manner of organizations and/or groups they choose.
I'm disgusted with liberals...............![]()
![]()
![]()
In simplistic terms, someone who is a per se "Defender of the Constitution" should in no way be deemed an outlaw or be included in any watch list
That would put an end to your weekends of fun running around in the woods in camo playing Green Beret, I suppose.
Larrry said:That would put an end to your weekends of fun running around in the woods in camo playing Green Beret, I suppose.
What a narrow minded attitude, no wonder they have a hard time understanding anything. They are stuck in their preconceived minds and can't get beyond these attitudes.
TexasBred said:Candidate Obama said:
In talking about his plans to double the size of the Peace Corps and nearly quadruple the size of AmeriCorps and the size of the nation's military services, he made this rather shocking (and chilling) pledge: "We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."..
Now, since I've never heard anyone inside or out of government use the phrase "civilian national security force" before, I was more than a little curious about what he has in mind.
Is it possible I am the only journalist in America who sought clarification on this campaign promise?
What does it mean?
If we're going to create some kind of national police force as big, powerful and well-funded as our combined U.S.
military forces, isn't this rather a big deal?
I thought Democrats generally believed the U.S. spent too much on the military.
Sandhusker said:TexasBred said:Candidate Obama said:
In talking about his plans to double the size of the Peace Corps and nearly quadruple the size of AmeriCorps and the size of the nation's military services, he made this rather shocking (and chilling) pledge: "We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."..
Now, since I've never heard anyone inside or out of government use the phrase "civilian national security force" before, I was more than a little curious about what he has in mind.
Is it possible I am the only journalist in America who sought clarification on this campaign promise?
What does it mean?
If we're going to create some kind of national police force as big, powerful and well-funded as our combined U.S.
military forces, isn't this rather a big deal?
I thought Democrats generally believed the U.S. spent too much on the military.
Badaxe likes to wail about spending on the military. I wonder what his take on Obama's idea is?
TexasBred said:Candidate Obama said:
In talking about his plans to double the size of the Peace Corps and nearly quadruple the size of AmeriCorps and the size of the nation's military services, he made this rather shocking (and chilling) pledge: "We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."..
Now, since I've never heard anyone inside or out of government use the phrase "civilian national security force" before, I was more than a little curious about what he has in mind.
Is it possible I am the only journalist in America who sought clarification on this campaign promise?
What does it mean?
If we're going to create some kind of national police force as big, powerful and well-funded as our combined U.S.
military forces, isn't this rather a big deal?
I thought Democrats generally believed the U.S. spent too much on the military.
TexasBred said:Candidate Obama said:
In talking about his plans to double the size of the Peace Corps and nearly quadruple the size of AmeriCorps and the size of the nation's military services, he made this rather shocking (and chilling) pledge: "We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."..
Now, since I've never heard anyone inside or out of government use the phrase "civilian national security force" before, I was more than a little curious about what he has in mind.
Is it possible I am the only journalist in America who sought clarification on this campaign promise?
What does it mean?
If we're going to create some kind of national police force as big, powerful and well-funded as our combined U.S.
military forces, isn't this rather a big deal?
I thought Democrats generally believed the U.S. spent too much on the military.
Ben H said:The question will be if they swear an oath, and if they do what will it say that it defends?