• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

"Defenders" Of The Constitution - Criminal?

Mike

Well-known member
The FBI has a new flyer alerting for "Defenders of the Constitution" and categorizing them blatantly with terrorists, etc.


Classifying them as "Right Wing Extremists".

http://www.retakingamerica.com/files/fbi_flyer.pdf
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Mike said:
The FBI has a new flyer alerting for "Defenders of the Constitution" and categorizing them blatantly with terrorists, etc.


Classifying them as "Right Wing Extremists".

http://www.retakingamerica.com/files/fbi_flyer.pdf

Did you happen to notice that Sheriff Joe's men lead up the Task Force....Or are you aware that the current FBI Director is Robert Mueller that was named to the position of FBI Director on July 5, 2001 by then President GW Bush- and confirmed unanimously by the Congress.... :???:
The socalled "Super Patriots" rightwingernuts have been on the FBI watch and domestic terrorist lists for years...

Next thing you know they'll be designating your KKK a hate/terrorist group--OOPS- I see they did that too..... :wink: :lol: :p
 

Mike

Well-known member
In simplistic terms, someone who is a per se "Defender of the Constitution" should in no way be deemed an outlaw or be included in any watch list...........................especially when self-described and professed "Communists" have a free rein to infiltrate whatever manner of organizations and/or groups they choose.

I'm disgusted with liberals............... :mad: :mad: :mad:
 

alice

Well-known member
Mike said:
In simplistic terms, someone who is a per se "Defender of the Constitution" should in no way be deemed an outlaw or be included in any watch list...........................especially when self-described and professed "Communists" have a free rein to infiltrate whatever manner of organizations and/or groups they choose.

I'm disgusted with liberals............... :mad: :mad: :mad:

In simplistic terms, someone who is a per se "Defender of the Constitution" should in no way be deemed an outlaw or be included in any watch list

That would put an end to your weekends of fun running around in the woods in camo playing Green Beret, I suppose.

Alice
 

Ben H

Well-known member
Yes, this is an older one, I thought it was Clinton Era back when the government was paranoid of Militias. When the government is playing the terrorist card with the Constitutionaly protected Militia, you know things are really messed up.

There is a much newer flyer in circulation from Homeland Security.

http://www.infowars.com/secret-stat...rr-chuck-baldwin-libertarians-are-terrorists/

I guess they think I'm a terrorist, screw 'em. ATF will be the ones who light the fuse.
 

TexasBred

Well-known member
Candidate Obama said:

In talking about his plans to double the size of the Peace Corps and nearly quadruple the size of AmeriCorps and the size of the nation's military services, he made this rather shocking (and chilling) pledge: "We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."..

Now, since I've never heard anyone inside or out of government use the phrase "civilian national security force" before, I was more than a little curious about what he has in mind.

Is it possible I am the only journalist in America who sought clarification on this campaign promise?

What does it mean?

If we're going to create some kind of national police force as big, powerful and well-funded as our combined U.S.

military forces, isn't this rather a big deal?

I thought Democrats generally believed the U.S. spent too much on the military.
 

Larrry

Well-known member
That would put an end to your weekends of fun running around in the woods in camo playing Green Beret, I suppose.

What a narrow minded attitude, no wonder they have a hard time understanding anything. They are stuck in their preconceived minds and can't get beyond these attitudes.
 

Mike

Well-known member
Larrry said:
That would put an end to your weekends of fun running around in the woods in camo playing Green Beret, I suppose.

What a narrow minded attitude, no wonder they have a hard time understanding anything. They are stuck in their preconceived minds and can't get beyond these attitudes.

It was ALICE that made the comment, Larrry. :lol:

Did you really expect something with intellect or wit? 8) :lol:

Little does she know that my group has a Navy and an Air Force.
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
TexasBred said:
Candidate Obama said:

In talking about his plans to double the size of the Peace Corps and nearly quadruple the size of AmeriCorps and the size of the nation's military services, he made this rather shocking (and chilling) pledge: "We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."..

Now, since I've never heard anyone inside or out of government use the phrase "civilian national security force" before, I was more than a little curious about what he has in mind.

Is it possible I am the only journalist in America who sought clarification on this campaign promise?

What does it mean?

If we're going to create some kind of national police force as big, powerful and well-funded as our combined U.S.

military forces, isn't this rather a big deal?

I thought Democrats generally believed the U.S. spent too much on the military.

Badaxe likes to wail about spending on the military. I wonder what his take on Obama's idea is?
 

TexasBred

Well-known member
Sandhusker said:
TexasBred said:
Candidate Obama said:

In talking about his plans to double the size of the Peace Corps and nearly quadruple the size of AmeriCorps and the size of the nation's military services, he made this rather shocking (and chilling) pledge: "We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."..

Now, since I've never heard anyone inside or out of government use the phrase "civilian national security force" before, I was more than a little curious about what he has in mind.

Is it possible I am the only journalist in America who sought clarification on this campaign promise?

What does it mean?

If we're going to create some kind of national police force as big, powerful and well-funded as our combined U.S.

military forces, isn't this rather a big deal?

I thought Democrats generally believed the U.S. spent too much on the military.

Badaxe likes to wail about spending on the military. I wonder what his take on Obama's idea is?

Recruiting began long ago with ACORN. We'll have a half million real nuts running around the woods with pants falling off their ass, caps on cocked to the side or backwards, speaking jive and not only shooting everything that moves but raping,pillaging and burning all for "The Cause".
 

Hanta Yo

Well-known member
TexasBred said:
Candidate Obama said:

In talking about his plans to double the size of the Peace Corps and nearly quadruple the size of AmeriCorps and the size of the nation's military services, he made this rather shocking (and chilling) pledge: "We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."..

Now, since I've never heard anyone inside or out of government use the phrase "civilian national security force" before, I was more than a little curious about what he has in mind.

Is it possible I am the only journalist in America who sought clarification on this campaign promise?

What does it mean?

If we're going to create some kind of national police force as big, powerful and well-funded as our combined U.S.

military forces, isn't this rather a big deal?

I thought Democrats generally believed the U.S. spent too much on the military.



TexasBred said:
Candidate Obama said:

In talking about his plans to double the size of the Peace Corps and nearly quadruple the size of AmeriCorps and the size of the nation's military services, he made this rather shocking (and chilling) pledge: "We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."..

Now, since I've never heard anyone inside or out of government use the phrase "civilian national security force" before, I was more than a little curious about what he has in mind.

Is it possible I am the only journalist in America who sought clarification on this campaign promise?

What does it mean?

If we're going to create some kind of national police force as big, powerful and well-funded as our combined U.S.

military forces, isn't this rather a big deal?

I thought Democrats generally believed the U.S. spent too much on the military.


I'm afraid it means this civilian security force will be Obama's thugs. If you watched the Obama Deception you would have seen a bunch of black kids going through exercises chanting yes we can-yes we can. I think this group is going to go out and get those of us who are determined to defend the Constitution. They are gathering together and getting ready as I am writing this :shock:
 

Tam

Well-known member
Ben H said:
The question will be if they swear an oath, and if they do what will it say that it defends?

I'd bet this is where the idea for an oath to the office of President that was tossed around a while ago came from. :???:
 
Top