• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Democrat morality

Soapweed

Well-known member
It appears that the DEMOCRATS suddenly have developed a keen sense of morality. John Edwards has been removed from speaking at the convention for having an extra-marital affair and lying about it. And in his place, Bill Clinton will be speaking.
 

leanin' H

Well-known member
I did not have...... is speaking in place of a guy who cheated on his cancer stricken wife. Just so ya'll know, if i did what either of those two did my wife would use me for bear bait. And i'd deserve it! Now a bunch of republicans are loose on morality also so this isn't just for dems, but whatever happened to principles and honesty and having the guts to do the right thing all the time? Most politicians make me sick after they get above small town city council positions. They start becoming prideful and powerful and forget the folks who voted em' in. Then big money comes calling and they need it to stay in power so they all cave the principles they used to stand for! What's wrong with politics is the simple fact that character and principle is traded for 30 pieces of silver. And the people who have the honesty and morals to change stuff want nothing to do with that career choice. Can ya blame em?
 

TSR

Well-known member
leanin' H said:
I did not have...... is speaking in place of a guy who cheated on his cancer stricken wife. Just so ya'll know, if i did what either of those two did my wife would use me for bear bait. And i'd deserve it! Now a bunch of republicans are loose on morality also so this isn't just for dems, but whatever happened to principles and honesty and having the guts to do the right thing all the time? Most politicians make me sick after they get above small town city council positions. They start becoming prideful and powerful and forget the folks who voted em' in. Then big money comes calling and they need it to stay in power so they all cave the principles they used to stand for! What's wrong with politics is the simple fact that character and principle is traded for 30 pieces of silver. And the people who have the honesty and morals to change stuff want nothing to do with that career choice. Can ya blame em?

You're right, morality issues are not party specific. But these things are inherent in man and will always be with us. There are even some self-righteous sinners here on Ranchers.net. I'll bet. lol
 

TexasBred

Well-known member
Doubt you'll find many sinners here who would allow a baby to survive an unsuccessful abortion and then lay it in the dirty laundry room to die but Obama thinks it's ok.
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
TexasBred said:
Doubt you'll find many sinners here who would allow a baby to survive an unsuccessful abortion and then lay it in the dirty laundry room to die but Obama thinks it's ok.

His supporters on this board must share Obama's views - I tried like heck with no luck to get any of them to disavow it.
 

TSR

Well-known member
TexasBred said:
Doubt you'll find many sinners here who would allow a baby to survive an unsuccessful abortion and then lay it in the dirty laundry room to die but Obama thinks it's ok.

I doubt you would find such a person here or one that would lack the forethought about starting a war in which thousands of innocents would die while the main culprit roams free.
 

RobertMac

Well-known member
TSR said:
TexasBred said:
Doubt you'll find many sinners here who would allow a baby to survive an unsuccessful abortion and then lay it in the dirty laundry room to die but Obama thinks it's ok.

I doubt you would find such a person here or one that would lack the forethought about starting a war in which thousands of innocents would die while the main culprit roams free.

TSR, the war was about the violation of a treaty and ignoring 17 UN resolutions about the treaty violation.
 

TSR

Well-known member
RobertMac said:
TSR said:
TexasBred said:
Doubt you'll find many sinners here who would allow a baby to survive an unsuccessful abortion and then lay it in the dirty laundry room to die but Obama thinks it's ok.

I doubt you would find such a person here or one that would lack the forethought about starting a war in which thousands of innocents would die while the main culprit roams free.

TSR, the war was about the violation of a treaty and ignoring 17 UN resolutions about the treaty violation.

Well I am certainly not going to open up and rehash that can of worms again. But I seriously doubt the majority of Americans believe that. And still the mastermind of 9/11 is free, that's the same one that attacked us and killed over 3000 Americans. A much more serious offense than violation of those resolutions, IMO.
 

nonothing

Well-known member
TSR said:
RobertMac said:
TSR said:
I doubt you would find such a person here or one that would lack the forethought about starting a war in which thousands of innocents would die while the main culprit roams free.

TSR, the war was about the violation of a treaty and ignoring 17 UN resolutions about the treaty violation.

Well I am certainly not going to open up and rehash that can of worms again. But I seriously doubt the majority of Americans believe that. And still the mastermind of 9/11 is free, that's the same one that attacked us and killed over 3000 Americans. A much more serious offense than violation of those resolutions, IMO.


:agree:
 

aplusmnt

Well-known member
TSR said:
Well I am certainly not going to open up and rehash that can of worms again. But I seriously doubt the majority of Americans believe that. And still the mastermind of 9/11 is free, that's the same one that attacked us and killed over 3000 Americans. A much more serious offense than violation of those resolutions, IMO.

Sorry, but did we not catch the mastermind behind 911? Was he not Khalid Shaikh Mohammed?

Just another Terrorist that Bill Clinton allowed to roam free that George Bush hunted down.

“I was responsible for the 9/11 operation, from A to Z,” he said : Khalid Shaikh Mohammed

Sure would love to catch Osama also, but the man is a god to many Muslims hiding out in a land full of Muslim sympathizers.
 

TSR

Well-known member
aplusmnt said:
TSR said:
Well I am certainly not going to open up and rehash that can of worms again. But I seriously doubt the majority of Americans believe that. And still the mastermind of 9/11 is free, that's the same one that attacked us and killed over 3000 Americans. A much more serious offense than violation of those resolutions, IMO.

Sorry, but did we not catch the mastermind behind 911? Was he not Khalid Shaikh Mohammed?

Just another Terrorist that Bill Clinton allowed to roam free that George Bush hunted down.

“I was responsible for the 9/11 operation, from A to Z,” he said : Khalid Shaikh Mohammed

Sure would love to catch Osama also, but the man is a god to many Muslims hiding out in a land full of Muslim sympathizers.

Aplus there weren't any Muslim sympathizers in Iraq? :???: The film I saw of Bin Laden laughing and talking about 9/11 has lead me to believe he was the one who initiated the plans for such an attack. I believe most Americans feel the same. Go down the street and just ask anyone who is the most wanted terrorist in the world and why?
 

leanin' H

Well-known member
And Iraq would be so much better off with Sadam still running things? We declared war on terrorism period. At home. And abroad. Or we can all hold hands and chant peace songs while the radicals wipe us out. Sadam was a radical dictator who funded and supported terror plots. Now we have the chance to watch a small democracy start growing. I say kill terror where it lives. Including Iran and anywhere else it threatens us. But thats just my opinion and it doesnt have much weight.
 

TSR

Well-known member
RobertMac said:
TSR, why did thirty countries join the USA in this conflict?

Probably one main reason was our monetary policy toward these countries. What were the percentages of front-line soldiers of each of these countiries when compared to our own brave men and women?
 

RobertMac

Well-known member
TSR said:
RobertMac said:
TSR, why did thirty countries join the USA in this conflict?

Probably one main reason was our monetary policy toward these countries. What were the percentages of front-line soldiers of each of these countiries when compared to our own brave men and women?
I'd like you to explain "our monetary policy toward these countries" a little more...please.

And I think the families of these other countries that lost soldiers would take exception to your comment AND it takes much more than front-line soldiers to have a successful campaign!!
 

TSR

Well-known member
RobertMac said:
TSR said:
RobertMac said:
TSR, why did thirty countries join the USA in this conflict?

Probably one main reason was our monetary policy toward these countries. What were the percentages of front-line soldiers of each of these countiries when compared to our own brave men and women?
I'd like you to explain "our monetary policy toward these countries" a little more...please.

And I think the families of these other countries that lost soldiers would take exception to your comment AND it takes much more than front-line soldiers to have a successful campaign!!

I would venture to say that many of these ccountries received some form of aid from the US at one time or another.
With respect to percentages of front-line soldiers, I am simply asking, as an example, for every 10 Americans how many from other countries were there? This is in no way meant to belittle anyone's efforts in the war regardless of where they were from. When I was in the military I think it was said that for every infantryman there were 7 support personel. But it still does speak volumes for our brave men and women, no one will convince me they did not do most of the "hard work".JMO
 
Top