• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Democrats Party like its 2005

aplusmnt

Well-known member
Guess Obama likes his beef, beef imported from Japan and costing as much as $300 per pound that is! Someone should tell him that we are in a recession, maybe he would lower his cocktail party cost a little then!

Or quit complaining about CEO's pay and parties when he has to have Kobe beef for his own party!

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1431204/wagyu_steak_gets_obama_in_hot_water.html?cat=9
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
What an elitist hypocrite this man is. Seems to me that more than one of us recognized that long ago.

Can we get rid of him yet?
 

badaxemoo

Well-known member
Sandhusker said:
What an elitist hypocrite this man is. Seems to me that more than one of us recognized that long ago.

Can we get rid of him yet?

That's right!

Let's get rid of him.

Serving up that overpriced beef is right up there with squandering billions in Iraq like his predecessor.

I'm sure glad we kicked Bush out.
 

badaxemoo

Well-known member
hypocritexposer said:
Serving up that overpriced beef is right up there with squandering billions in Iraq like his predecessor.

Obama plans to transfer that spending to Afganistan, where's the change?

I think our efforts in Afghanistan are largely a waste of money as well.

But do me a favor and look up how much we have spent there and area projected to spend there and compare it to Iraq.
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
But do me a favor and look up how much we have spent there and area projected to spend there and compare it to Iraq.

Alot of the cost has been carried by other countries too, don't forget! It looks like it is started to spill into Pakistan, will that cost more?
 

hopalong

Well-known member
badaxemoo said:
Sandhusker said:
What an elitist hypocrite this man is. Seems to me that more than one of us recognized that long ago.

Can we get rid of him yet?

That's right!

Let's get rid of him.

Serving up that overpriced beef is right up there with squandering billions in Iraq like his predecessor.

I'm sure glad we kicked Bush out.

You didn't kick Bush out, he couldn't run again!!!!

Your argument that Bush spent money on defense against OVER priced beef from a foreign county really is STUPID, coming from someone that CLAIMS to run cows!

NUFF SAID!!!!!!!
 

badaxemoo

Well-known member
hopalong said:
badaxemoo said:
Sandhusker said:
What an elitist hypocrite this man is. Seems to me that more than one of us recognized that long ago.

Can we get rid of him yet?

That's right!

Let's get rid of him.

Serving up that overpriced beef is right up there with squandering billions in Iraq like his predecessor.

I'm sure glad we kicked Bush out.

You didn't kick Bush out, he couldn't run again!!!!

Your argument that Bush spent money on defense against OVER priced beef from a foreign county really is STUPID, coming from someone that CLAIMS to run cows!

NUFF SAID!!!!!!!

Um...the point was that we DIDN'T kick Bush out for things millions of magnitudes more serious that serving Japanese beef.

Perhaps the sarcasm detector on your tinfoil helmet needs calibration.

Two other points:

1. How were we "defending" ourselves from Saddam Hussein? Just when and where did the Iraqi regime attack the U.S.

2. I don't think Obama should be serving Wagyu at the White House either. I'd be willing to supply him with all the high quality grassfed beef he needs and it would certainly be cheaper.

However, I hardly think it is an impeachable offense and for some wingnuts to get their undies in a bunch over this after eight years of the idiot-in-chief is the pinnacle of stupidity.
 

Mike

Well-known member
How were we "defending" ourselves from Saddam Hussein? Just when and where did the Iraqi regime attack the U.S.

Several times during the "Fly Zone" flyovers even while Clinton was prez.

I remember well Clinton sending missiles into Iraq.

Oh, and you might ask the Congressmen that voted to allow the invasion your question. They prolly had much more intelligence than you do.
One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." --Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." --Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton, signed by: -- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." -Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." -- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." Letter to President Bush, Signed by: -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them." -- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." -- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" -- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." -- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..." -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
They prolly had much more intelligence than you do.

That's a little misleading Mike. I think what you meant to say is that they had more spy/CIA intelligence. The actual intelligence of all the congressman is up for discussion! :lol: :lol:
 

badaxemoo

Well-known member
Mike said:
How were we "defending" ourselves from Saddam Hussein? Just when and where did the Iraqi regime attack the U.S.

Several times during the "Fly Zone" flyovers even while Clinton was prez.

I remember well Clinton sending missiles into Iraq.

Oh, and you might ask the Congressmen that voted to allow the invasion your question. They prolly had much more intelligence than you do.

You're right Mike! That sure has been some money well-spent. I'm glad to know you don't believe in proportionality.

Next time an American citizen gets punched in the nose in London, we better lob a few cruise missiles at Buckingham Palace.

My DEMOCRATIC congressman has heard plenty from me about his Bush-enabling vote. It was a team effort, but the old brush-cutter was the quarterback.
 

Mike

Well-known member
hypocritexposer said:
They prolly had much more intelligence than you do.

That's a little misleading Mike. I think what you meant to say is that they had more spy/CIA intelligence. The actual intelligence of all the congressman is up for discussion! :lol: :lol:

I still think they have more intelligence than broadaxe. :lol:
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Do we know for sure that Iraq wasn't a danger?

At what point do we all agree that Iran will become a danger?

Maybe we should get that out of the way now, so there's less disagreement on the point in time they are a danger!

What moment in time will they become a threat?
 

badaxemoo

Well-known member
Mike said:
hypocritexposer said:
They prolly had much more intelligence than you do.

That's a little misleading Mike. I think what you meant to say is that they had more spy/CIA intelligence. The actual intelligence of all the congressman is up for discussion! :lol: :lol:

I still think they have more intelligence than broadaxe. :lol:

He's a Harvard guy, so I would hope he is smarter than me.

Oh, wait, didn't somebody else who just left office attend Harvard?

I retract my original statement.
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
badaxemoo said:
hypocritexposer said:
Serving up that overpriced beef is right up there with squandering billions in Iraq like his predecessor.

Obama plans to transfer that spending to Afganistan, where's the change?

I think our efforts in Afghanistan are largely a waste of money as well.

But do me a favor and look up how much we have spent there and area projected to spend there and compare it to Iraq.

Do me a favor and see how many Democrats were beating the drums and voting to go into Iraq.
 

badaxemoo

Well-known member
Sandhusker said:
badaxemoo said:
hypocritexposer said:
Obama plans to transfer that spending to Afganistan, where's the change?

I think our efforts in Afghanistan are largely a waste of money as well.

But do me a favor and look up how much we have spent there and area projected to spend there and compare it to Iraq.

Do me a favor and see how many Democrats were beating the drums and voting to go into Iraq.

Plenty.

You will get now argument from me there.

It was the biggest failure I've seen my disorganized party pull off in my lifetime.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
aplusmnt said:
Guess Obama likes his beef, beef imported from Japan and costing as much as $300 per pound that is! Someone should tell him that we are in a recession, maybe he would lower his cocktail party cost a little then!

Or quit complaining about CEO's pay and parties when he has to have Kobe beef for his own party!

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1431204/wagyu_steak_gets_obama_in_hot_water.html?cat=9

You might check out this website. All Kobe beef is not from Japan. There are some ranchers here in America raising the Wagu Cows. I know one here in East Texas. Maybe that is what the rest of us need to do.
http://www.kobe-beef.com/Why-Kobe-Beef/default.aspx
 
Top