• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Diane Francis: New world order: part II

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
New world order: part II
Posted: June 18, 2009, 2:28 PM by Diane Francis

The bankruptcy south of the border, thanks to America's monetary and fiscal and financial institution malpractice, has erased the unipolar reality and left a power vacuum into which new players are leaping.

The latest entry to help participate actively in the New World Order is a concocted coterie calling itself BRIC, the Davos-derived acronym for the biggest up-and-comers economically: Brazil, Russia, India and China.

The BRIC group has absolutely nothing in common except that they want to have a say in the Multipolar world that's evolved now that the Yankee Hegemon is flat on its economic back. They join the throng which now includes disparate partnerships-for-power such as the original G7 (where Canada is a member even though its economy is smaller than Spain's or Brazil's), the G8 (Russia added to the Big Seven even though it's smaller than Illinois economically), the newly-minted G20 (to deal with the crisis), the G2 (US and China who will eventually run everything), the Cairns, OPEC and have-nots which could variously be labelled as the G50, G100 and G172.



The bankruptcy south of the border, thanks to America's monetary and fiscal and financial institution malpractice, has erased the unipolar reality and left a power vacuum into which new players are leaping.
The latest entry to help participate actively in the New World Order is a concocted coterie calling itself BRIC, the Davos-derived acronym for the biggest up-and-comers economically: Brazil, Russia, India and China.

The BRIC group has absolutely nothing in common except that they want to have a say in the Multipolar world that's evolved now that the Yankee Hegemon is flat on its economic back. They join the throng which now includes disparate partnerships-for-power such as the original G7 (where Canada is a member even though its economy is smaller than Spain's or Brazil's), the G8 (Russia added to the Big Seven even though it's smaller than Illinois economically), the newly-minted G20 (to deal with the crisis), the G2 (US and China who will eventually run everything), the Cairns, OPEC and have-nots which could variously be labelled as the G50, G100 and G172.

Global government is born

The significance of all this summitry is that the world is rapidly restructuring itself into a system of globalized governance as a result of the meltdown.

The G8 and G20 are functioning like the world's cabinet.
BRIC, OPEC, Cairns and others are functioning like political parties or coalitions formed to further common interests or as countervails to other coalitions.

"This development is equivalent to the industrial revolution and reformation in history," declared Commonwealth Secretary-General Ramleh Sharma at the recent Conference of Montreal. "We are talking about the end of geography. The death of time and distance. A compacting world. Non polarity. This means a demand for social justice, redistribution of rights, opportunities and resources not only in national terms, but international terms."

He said the G172 is as important as the G20 and that the "mainstream will have to take care of the marginalized" just as occurs in developed, enlightened nation-states. He also pointed out that two more clusters of countries -- the Commonwealth and Francophonie -- are organized and represent 50% of the world's population, including some of its poorest residents.

"This means the universal wisdom -- `do unto others as you would have them do unto you' -- is now the ethic for global government," he said.

A new global vocabulary

What this compaction or globalization will eventually mean is:
Poorer nations cannot be ignored but will be regarded, like our national "ghettos" or slums, as places where bootstrapping by wealthier citizens is needed.

Dangerous or failed states cannot be ignored but will be regarded, like our dangerous neighborhoods, as places where police must patrol vigorously and investments/spending to help local residents must be undertaken.

Rich countries will be regarded as the world's "good neighborhoods" where people can contribute taxes or charitable donations to less fortunate countries in order to keep the world safe as well as to help improve global living standards.

This level of collaboration may seem naively optimistic but international cooperation took a giant leap forward after the last catastrophe, the Second World War, when rich and poor allies forged a new world order that rebuilt devastated nations in Europe and elsewhere and vastly improved living standards for 60 years.

Now the unprecedented destruction of wealth is starting to coalesce the world's leaders and global initiatives designed to extend human justice and economic opportunity to hundreds of millions more people for another 60 years.

http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/francis/archive/2009/06/18/new-world-order-part-ii.aspx
 

MoGal

Well-known member
I guess you do know that Kissinger has praised China for being the role model towards a "new world order".

If China is a role model: their working class people are very suppressed not only with their wages but also living conditions. They have silenced the internet and blocked many websites (just as google and yahoo are doing now in the US).
They have surveillance cameras everywhere.

Read your history....... the money printing plates were sent to Russia back in the 1930's and they printed up 350 million dollars which the american people have had to pay off...... and we the taxpayers have heavily supported Russia since that time.

The history I've been reading is nothing like what was in my school books back in the 70's.
 

MsSage

Well-known member
kolanuraven said:
MoGal said:
The history I've been reading is nothing like what was in my school books back in the 70's.


Boy howdy...now this statement I can believe, coming from you!!!
Being a teacher I know you KNOW how bad most of the textbooks are.
Hail just from the wrong info alone not to mention misinformation.
 

MoGal

Well-known member
kolanuraven said:
MoGal said:
The history I've been reading is nothing like what was in my school books back in the 70's.


Boy howdy...now this statement I can believe, coming from you!!!


Kola my school books never talked about Abraham Lincoln being the head of the Rosicrucians. That was disappointing to me. Read Carroll Quigley, "tragedy and hope" . My textbooks in school would have made you believe the Federal Reserve was part of the Federal Government not owned by European private bankers. They never once mentioned how the mainstream media was owned by 5 corporations and monopolize what we hear. I mean it just goes on and on and on......
 

MoGal

Well-known member
I didn't know you were a teacher Kola..........let me ask you and please read this entire article as it lists the newspapers and magazines where its referenced from:

http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/psychotronic-tyranny.htm

answer this question for me, are you teaching this to your kids in school and making them aware of it????

You know Kola, we christians aren't going to be around here forever telling you what is coming up. This country needs to repent and return to God and follow his commandments. I don't fear for christians in what is coming, because we have God's protection over us (the blood of Jesus Christ) as there will be selective judgment on America, the christians will be living in Goatia while the unsaved will be in Egypt.
 
Top