• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Does Oldtimer Support the Administration LYING.

Tam

Well-known member
Refresh my memory Oldtimer did you voice any concerns when it was proven Obama, Hillary and Rice lied about Benghazi being a protest over a little seen video?

Here are a few points of that issue I would like to hear your feelings on.

What was the likelihood that Obama didn't lie about it being caused by a video like he spent three weeks claiming it was , when Ham knew within minutes it was a Terrorist Attack and he told Panetta and Dempsey who had a Oval Office briefing within minutes of the TERRORIST ATTACK starting?

What was the likelihood that Rice didn't know it was a Terrorist Attack when she went on 5 Sunday talk shows and claimed it was the video since it was reported they watched the attack in real time from the Situation room thanks to the Drones sending back video of the attack?

DO you agree with Hillary's Congressional testimony that it shouldn't matter that she, Obama, and Rice LIED about the attack and everyone should just forget their deceit and move on to something else.

Does it matter at all to you that four men died in Benghazi and Hillary told those families that their loved ones died over a video, knowing full well the video had nothing to do with the PLANNED TERRORIST ATTACK that killed their loved ones?

Does it matter to you that the Obama Administration told Benghazi survivors that were not to talk to the Congressmen that came asking for their versions of what went on the night of the attack and in some cases hid survivors so they could not be questioned?

Does any of this matter to you when 66% of registered voters including 50% of Democrats want the Benghazi Scandal investigated further as they don't believe the Obama Regimes version of events considering the Democrat Control Senate report rule the attack was Preventable if Hillary had done her job in the State Department. OH and let's not forget the fact Obama could not have it known it was an Al Queade TERRORIST ATTACK as he was spewing campaign rhetoric about Osama being dead and Al Queade was on the run.

They were running alright, right in the Consulate in Benghazi Killing Americans on their way in. :mad:
 

iwannabeacowboy

Well-known member
Since he was quiet for months, doesn't that indicate he approved of all that occurred?


It's gotta hurt to be beat over the head over and over and over again by your own words. A sane individual would stop providing the opposition ammunition and leverage.
 

Tam

Well-known member
iwannabeacowboy said:
Since he was quiet for months, doesn't that indicate he approved of all that occurred?


It's gotta hurt to be beat over the head over and over and over again by your own words. A sane individual would stop providing the opposition ammunition and leverage.

YES in his logic it does mean exactly that!!!!!SILENCE MEANS SUPPORT

If he is going to accuse any of us of being racists because we don't comment on every post made on ranchers then he is going to get beat over the head as most of the Obama scandals that he has not commented on happened before he had his little rant and left. He left because he made an azz of himself trying to distract issues with name calling and lying about posters, so If he does not want to defend his heros actions NOW THAT HE IS BACK he should have stayed away and not accuse us of being racists because we don't agree with him and his liberal buddy's attempts to destroy the US one lie at a time. :x
 

hopalong

Well-known member
I and a few others said from the get go oldtimers EGO would not let him stay away... He lied then when he ranted and he will lie again and again. just his nature,, he cant help it, he has a need to feel important

EH?
 
Top