• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Dow Jones Industrial Average Cracks All-Time Closing High,

katrina

Well-known member
Dow Jones Industrial Average Cracks All-Time Closing High, Then Retreats
Thursday, September 28, 2006


NEW YORK — The Dow Jones industrial average reached a milestone Thursday in Wall Street's nearly seven-year recovery from corporate upheaval, ( and who has been the president for the last seven years?) economic recession and terrorism, briefly trading above its record high close of 11,722.98 set on Jan. 14, 2000.

The Dow rose 29.21, or 0.25 percent, to 11,718.45. It has yet to reach its all-time trading high of 11,750.28, also set Jan. 14, 2000.

The broader Standard & Poor's 500 and Nasdaq composite indexes are far off their all-time highs, although their records were reached around the same time.



The S&P, which gained 2.56, or 0.19 percent, to close at 1,339.15, is still about 188 points below its closing high of 1,527.46, but is at a 5 1/2-year high. :nod: The Nasdaq, which rose 6.63, or 0.29 percent, to 2,270.02, is not expected to approach its high close of 5,048.62 any time soon.

The index of 30 blue chip stocks surpassed its record, rising to a high of 11,728.46 in early morning trading. Stocks closed only modestly higher amid a dearth of news that could motivate investors; still, it was the market's fourth straight advance. :nod:



"These numbers sometimes tend to act as magnets and the market is sometimes pulled up toward it," said Russ Koesterich, senior portfolio manager at Barclays Global Investments in San Francisco.

The Dow, whose large-cap stocks range from aluminum producer Alcoa Inc. (AA) to discount retailer Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (WMT), was the first big index to recover because it did not rise as much in value as the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq in 2000.

The last time the Dow stood at these levels, Wall Street was propelled by wide-eyed investors eager for a slice of the wealth being generated by the dot-com and housing booms. Traders raced to buy any stocks that looked remotely promising, catapulting the major indexes sharply higher.

But after early 2000, the market began to crumble, slowly at first as doubts about the high-tech boom set in. Signs of recession accelerated the decline, and then the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks and their aftermath, including earnings declines and losses in many industries, sent stocks plunging.

It didn't stop there — corporate scandals including the collapse of Enron Corp. and WorldCom Inc. also shook Wall Street. The combination of all these factors devastated stocks, sending the Dow to a five-year closing low of 7,286.27 on Oct. 9, 2002, nearly 38 percent off its record high close.

Wall Street made its way back slowly, with investors behaving more cautiously and limiting their exposure to risk as they slowly regained faith in stocks. What has also helped is more than four years of sturdy corporate profit growth despite the threat that energy prices and interest rates would hurt consumer spending and companies' bottom lines.

More recently, the Federal Reserve's decision to pause after more than two years of interest rate hikes and evidence the economy is moderating, not heading for a hard landing, gave investors the impetus to push the Dow past its high close. :D

On Thursday, the economic news was mixed, and didn't appear to have much impact on trading. The Commerce Department revised its gross domestic product number for spring downward to 2.6 percent from 2.9 percent.

Meanwhile, the Labor Department reported that the number of new people signing up for unemployment benefits dropped last week. The department said new applications filed for unemployment insurance declined by a seasonally adjusted 6,000 to 316,000 for the work week ending Sept. 23. The latest showing on claims was close to economists' expectations for claims to total around 315,000 last week.

Bonds fell Thursday, with the yield on the 10-year Treasury note at 4.61 percent, up from 4.59 percent Thursday. The dollar rose against other major currencies. Gold prices also rose. :D

Crude oil futures also fell. A barrel of light crude settled at $62.76, down 20 cents, on the New York Mercantile Exchange.

In corporate news, General Motors Corp. (GM) rose 78 cents to $33.06 after dissident shareholder Kirk Kerkorian told GM he is interested in buying up to 12 million more shares of the company as he presses the automaker to enter a three-way alliance with Renault and Nissan.

Hewlett-Packard Co. (HPQ), which is drawing scrutiny from Congress over a corporate spying probe, rose 58 cents to $35.97 after the company announced the resignation of general counsel Ann Baskins.

American Greetings Corp. (AM), the nation's second-largest greeting cards maker, fell $2.21 to $22.83 after swinging to a loss in the second quarter from a year-ago profit, due in part to new marketing and operational initiatives.

Advancing issues led decliners by 8 to 7 on the New York Stock Exchange, where volume was 1.49 billion shares, down from 1.73 billion at the same time Wednesday.

The Russell 2000 index of smaller companies rose 0.02, or less than 0.01 percent, to 732.56.

Overseas, Japan's Nikkei stock average rose 0.48 percent. Britain's FTSE 100 rose 0.69 percent, Germany's DAX index slipped 0.01 percent, and France's CAC-40 gained 0.13 percent.
 

Cal

Well-known member
But..but...but, weren't there polls or something showing the economy in the crapper? How could this happen?
 

the chief

Well-known member
Wow, Bush's economic plan :???: is really working.

OH, WAIT.
According to the "experts" on this site:

When the economy was in the crapper under Reagan, it was because of Carter.

When the economy was good under Clinton, it was because of Reagan.

When the economy faltered during Bush's term, it was because of Clinton's plan.

So, I'm assuming then that the good economy now, MUST be Clinton's plan too.

NO? Why not? Because that doesn't buy into your theory?


:roll: :roll: :roll:
 

Cal

Well-known member
the chief said:
Wow, Bush's economic plan :???: is really working.

OH, WAIT.
According to the "experts" on this site:

When the economy was in the crapper under Reagan, it was because of Carter.

When the economy was good under Clinton, it was because of Reagan.

When the economy faltered during Bush's term, it was because of Clinton's plan.

So, I'm assuming then that the good economy now, MUST be Clinton's plan too.

NO? Why not? Because that doesn't buy into your theory?


:roll: :roll: :roll:
Uhh, yeah, such a recovery after 9/11 and such must be because of Clinton. :roll: Noone can accuse you of making sense.
 

the chief

Well-known member
Cal said:
the chief said:
Wow, Bush's economic plan :???: is really working.

OH, WAIT.
According to the "experts" on this site:

When the economy was in the crapper under Reagan, it was because of Carter.

When the economy was good under Clinton, it was because of Reagan.

When the economy faltered during Bush's term, it was because of Clinton's plan.

So, I'm assuming then that the good economy now, MUST be Clinton's plan too.

NO? Why not? Because that doesn't buy into your theory?


:roll: :roll: :roll:
Uhh, yeah, such a recovery after 9/11 and such must be because of Clinton. :roll: Noone can accuse you of making sense.

Neither does giving credit to Reagan when the economy was so great under Clinton. When a man is in office, and things are going great, give him the credit. When a man is in office, and things turn to crap, he deserves the blame as well.

That is MY point.
 

Latest posts

Top