• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Dr. Alan Sabrosky, retired Army War College Professor 9/11

Help Support Ranchers.net:

A

Anonymous

Guest
http://www.bigeye.com/sabrosky.htm


"What we need to stand up and say is not only did they attack the USS Liberty, they did 9/11. They did it. I have had long conversations over the past two weeks with contacts at the Army War College, at it's headquarters, Marine Corps and I made it absolutely clear in both cases that it is 100 percent certain that 9/11 was a Mossad operation. Period." -

Dr. Alan Sabrosky, March 14, 2010 - listen to podcast

Alan Sabrosky (Ph.D., University of Michigan) is a writer and consultant specializing in national and international security affairs. In December 1988, he received the Superior Civilian Service Award after more than five years of service at the U.S. Army War College as Director of Studies, Strategic Studies Institute, and holder of the General of the Army Douglas MacArthur Chair of Research.

He is listed in WHO'S WHO IN THE EAST (23rd ed.). A Marine Corps Vietnam veteran and a 1986 graduate of the U.S. Army War College, Dr. Sabrosky's teaching and research appointments have included the United States Military Academy, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), Middlebury College and Catholic University; while in government service, he held concurrent adjunct professorships at Georgetown University and the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS).

Dr. Sabrosky has lectured widely on defense and foreign affairs in the United States and abroad. You can email Dr. Alan Sabrosky at: [email protected]

Zionism Unmasked:
The Dark Face Of Jewish Nationalism

By Dr. Alan Sabrosky

11 March, 2010 Sabbah.biz

Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu once remarked to a Likud gathering that "Israel is not like other countries." Oddly enough for him, that time he was telling the truth, and nowhere is that more evident than with Jewish nationalism, whether or not one pins the "Zionist" label on it.

Nationalism in most countries and cultures can have both positive and negative aspects, unifying a people and sometimes leading them against their neighbors. Extremism can emerge, and often has, at least in part in almost every nationalist/independence movement I can recall (e.g., the French nationalist movement had The Terror, Kenya's had the Mau Mau, etc.).

But whereas extremism in other nationalist movements is an aberration, extremism in Jewish nationalism is the norm, pitting Zionist Jews (secular or observant) against the goyim (everyone else), who are either possible predator or certain prey, if not both sequentially. This does not mean that all Jews or all Israelis feel and act this way, by any means. But it does mean that Israel today is what it cannot avoid being, and what it would be under any electable government (a point I'll develop in another article).

The differences between Jewish nationalism (Zionism) and that of other countries and cultures here I think are fourfold:

Zionism is a real witches' brew of xenophobia, racism, ultra-nationalism, and militarism that places it way outside of a "mere" nationalist context — for example, when I was in Ireland (both parts) I saw no indication whatsoever that the PIRAs or anyone else pressing for a united Ireland had a shred of design on shoving Protestants into camps or out of the country, although there may well have been a handful who thought that way — and goes far beyond the misery for others professed by the Nazis

Zionism undermines civic loyalty among its adherents in other countries in a way that other nationalist movements (and even ultra-nationalist movements like Nazism) did not — e.g., a large majority of American Jews, including those who are not openly dual citizens, espouse a form of political bigamy called "dual loyalty" (to Israel & the US) that is every bit as dishonest as marital bigamy, attempts to finesse the precedence they give to Israel over the US (lots of Rahm Emanuels out there who served in the IDF but NOT in the US armed forces), and has absolutely no parallel in the sense of national or cultural identity espoused by any other definable ethnic or racial group in America — even the Nazi Bund in the US disappeared once Germany and the US went to war, with almost all of its members volunteering for the US armed forces

The "enemy" of normal nationalist movements is the occupying power and perhaps its allies, and once independence is achieved, normal relations with the occupying power are truly the norm, but for Zionism almost everyone out there is an actual or potential enemy, differing only in proximity and placement on its very long list of enemies (which is now America's target list) and

Almost all nationalist movements (including the irredentist and secessionist variants) intend to create an independent state from a population in place or to reunite a separated people (like the Sudeten Germans in the 1930s) — it is very rare for it to include the wholesale displacement of another indigenous population, which is far more common of successful colonialist movements as in the US — and perhaps a reason why most Americans wouldn't care too much about what the Israelis are doing to the Palestinians even if they DID know about it, is because that is no different than what Europeans in North America did to the Indians/Native Americans here in a longer & more low-tech fashion.

The implications of this for Middle East peace prospects, and for other countries in thrall to their domestic Jewish lobbies or not, are chilling. The Book of Deuteronomy come to life in a state with a nuclear arsenal would be enough to give pause to anyone not bought or bribed into submission — which these days encompasses the US Government, given Israel's affinity for throwing crap into the face of the Obama administration and Obama's visible affinity for accepting it with a smile, Bibi Netanyahu's own "Uncle Tom" come to Washington.

The late General Moshe Dayan, who — Zionist or not — remains an honored part of my own Pantheon of military heroes, allegedly observed that Israel's security depended on its being viewed by others as a mad dog. He may have been correct. But he neglected to note that the preferred response of everyone else is to kill that mad dog before it can decide to go berserk and bite. It is an option worth considering.


Alan Sabrosky (Ph.D, University of Michigan) is a ten-year US Marine Corps veteran and a graduate of the US Army War College. He can be contacted at [email protected]
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 4, 2009
Messages
5,855
Reaction score
0
Location
Venezuela
Like you, he's entitled to his opinion. Also, like you, I see he's offered no credible proof of his assertions.

Birds of a feather................or in this case, two loons.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Whitewing said:
Like you, he's entitled to his opinion. Also, like you, I see he's offered no credible proof of his assertions.

Birds of a feather................or in this case, two loons.

and the proof you have that 19 jihadists were able to successfully hijack 4 planes on one day, the us military were unable to respond, they hit 3 of their targets, including hitting 2 wtc towers and got 3 to fall at freefall speed?

you bought this story in the first day your tube told you so and never changed your mind. now that shows real intelligence.
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 4, 2009
Messages
5,855
Reaction score
0
Location
Venezuela
shaumei said:
Whitewing said:
Like you, he's entitled to his opinion. Also, like you, I see he's offered no credible proof of his assertions.

Birds of a feather................or in this case, two loons.

and the proof you have that 19 jihadists were able to successfully hijack 4 planes on one day, the us military were unable to respond, they hit 3 of their targets, including hitting 2 wtc towers and got 3 to fall at freefall speed?

you bought this story in the first day your tube told you so and never changed your mind. now that shows real intelligence.

Repeating the "free fall speed" lie over and over will never make it the truth so quit talking out of your ass on that one. It gets tiring. Really.

As for the 19 jihadists who hijacked 4 planes on one day and flew them into 3 of their 4 intended targets, I've certainly provided far more proof via the links to credible sources than you have. Youtube and conspiracy planet do not count as credible sources to anyone but a loon like you.

And thank you for completely ignoring the fact that the good Dr. also talks out of his ass while presenting not one shred of credible evidence that Jews were responsible for 9-11.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Whitewing said:
shaumei said:
Whitewing said:
Like you, he's entitled to his opinion. Also, like you, I see he's offered no credible proof of his assertions.

Birds of a feather................or in this case, two loons.

and the proof you have that 19 jihadists were able to successfully hijack 4 planes on one day, the us military were unable to respond, they hit 3 of their targets, including hitting 2 wtc towers and got 3 to fall at freefall speed?

you bought this story in the first day your tube told you so and never changed your mind. now that shows real intelligence.

Repeating the "free fall speed" lie over and over will never make it the truth so quit talking out of your ass on that one. It gets tiring. Really.

As for the 19 jihadists who hijacked 4 planes on one day and flew them into 3 of their 4 intended targets, I've certainly provided far more proof via the links to credible sources than you have. Youtube and conspiracy planet do not count as credible sources to anyone but a loon like you.

And thank you for completely ignoring the fact that the good Dr. also talks out of his ass while presenting not one shred of credible evidence that Jews were responsible for 9-11.

For those with a brain, NIST ADMITTED PARTIAL FREEFALL ON WTC7, THE SMOKING GUN OF 9/11. If you have one that was demolished you have 3 that were demolished and wired by someone.

Here is their admission on tape:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDvNS9iMjzA&feature=related
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 4, 2009
Messages
5,855
Reaction score
0
Location
Venezuela
:lol: I see you're modifying your position there Shamu. After callin you on your half-truth a dozen or more times, you're FINALLY using the word PARTIAL!

Must suck being you.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Whitewing said:
:lol: I see you're modifying your position there Shamu. After callin you on your half-truth a dozen or more times, you're FINALLY using the word PARTIAL!

Must suck being you.

any freefall speed means demolition. when i look at the video of the collapse, i see 100 percent freefall. but, NIST after 7 years of fighting it, finally admitted partial. but that admission means demolition. this means conspiracy to plant bombs and wire the building.
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 4, 2009
Messages
5,855
Reaction score
0
Location
Venezuela
shaumei said:
Whitewing said:
:lol: I see you're modifying your position there Shamu. After callin you on your half-truth a dozen or more times, you're FINALLY using the word PARTIAL!

Must suck being you.

any freefall speed means demolition. when i look at the video of the collapse, i see 100 percent freefall. but, NIST after 7 years of fighting it, finally admitted partial. but that admission means demolition. this means conspiracy to plant bombs and wire the building.

It's painfully obvious to all of us that you see lots of things while watching videos.

capt05e8f21b537b1aaf3936549d059c875d1.jpg


And while I'm no expert, I'm betting that any freefall speed does not mean demolition.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
whitewing,

you are now showing that you never got past high school. if you do no understand what partial freefall speed means....

you simply are a fool.

explain the ramifications of freefall speed at any point in the collapse of the wtc7?
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 4, 2009
Messages
5,855
Reaction score
0
Location
Venezuela
shaumei said:
whitewing,

you are now showing that you never got past high school. if you do no understand what partial freefall speed means....

you simply are a fool.

explain the ramifications of freefall speed at any point in the collapse of the wtc7?

I told you, you loon, I'm not an expert in the subject. Why don't you explain to us morons the ramifications?
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Messages
24,216
Reaction score
0
Location
real world
Whitewing said:
lightninboy said:
The Kohl was hit by Israel.

:lol:

Prove that one.....and I assume you mean the Cole.

No, it was the "Kohl", it was a German ship, flying the US flag.

The US Government was taken over by the Nazis, after WWII, through "operation paperclip" That's why they allow the Jews to control everything.

Oh wait.....how does that work?


It think my conspiracy theories have collided. I may have just found the answer to the World's energy problems.




:lol: :lol:
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 4, 2009
Messages
5,855
Reaction score
0
Location
Venezuela
In the theme of Mossad agents, false flag ops, and US government involvement, it seemed logical to me that he was talking about the USS Cole.

Afterall, if the first WTC bombing by Mossad agents, and the Kohbar Tower bombing hadn't done the trick, why not the Cole to get things really rolling?

Having said that, I'd forgotten about the Nazi takeover of the US government after WWII.

With the US government's partnership with Mossad agents to bring down the towers, this all gets so confusing. :?
 

lightninboy

Well-known member
Joined
May 6, 2007
Messages
681
Reaction score
0
Location
NE South Dakota
I heard some of this program on Public Radio on December 7, 2010. It was originally aired in October 2010.

American Abroad Media
Remembering the Cole
That guided missile destroyer was the USS Cole. And the explosion on October 12, 2000 was a terrorist attack. The blast tore a 40-foot hole in the side of the ship, and killed seventeen sailors. "We will find out who is responsible," vowed President Clinton, "and hold them accountable." The US found out al Qaeda was responsible, but did not hold them accountable: no missile strikes, no court trials. Ten years gone, the Cole bombing is still an open wound.

http://www.americaabroadmedia.org/programs/view/id/150


I did some research on the Cole.


While refueling in the Yemeni port of Aden on October 12, 2000, the $1 billion USS Cole was struck by a $5000 boat piloted by two suicide bombers that blasted a 30 feet by 40 feet hole midway in the hull just above the waterline, killing 17 American sailors and injuring 39 others.

http://www.twf.org/News/Y2000/1031-Cole.html


USS Cole was hit by a specially-configured Popeye cruise missile launched from an Israeli Dolphin-class submarine.

http://www.granddelusion.com/false-flag-attacks/uss-cole/


Did Israel Bomb the U.S.S. Cole? It Looks Like It

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=23860


Did Israel DO USS Cole bombing and frame Arabs as usual??? a la 9/11, 1967
USS Liberty, etc.....Mossad false flag operations.....

http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences/browse_thread/thread/cb9529143256429c


The USS Cole was hit by an Israeli cruise missile to sway public opinion against Arabs (Al Qaeda), as well as demonize the democrats (didn’t take terror threat seriously) — so that their puppet George Bush Jr. could be hurled into office in time for 9/11. This was of course completely covered up.

http://www.pakalertpress.com/2010/07/28/israel-did-911-all-the-proof-in-the-world/


The Pentagon's senior judge overseeing terror trials at Guantanamo Bay dropped charges Thursday against an al-Qaida suspect in the 2000 USS Cole bombing, upholding President Barack Obama's order to freeze military tribunals there.

http://peakoilpetroleumandpreciousmetals.yuku.com/topic/6991/t/Obama-Pardons-USS-Cole-Bomber.html


I did some research on NPR.


America Abroad Media is grateful for the contributions and generous support of those who help to make all of our work possible. We are proud to partner with the following foundations:
ExxonMobil
Ford Foundation
Henry Luce Foundation
Ploughshares Fund
……………

http://www.americaabroadmedia.org/about-aam/supporters


America Abroad Media is pleased to have the following members on the Advisory Board.
Chuck Hagel
John Kerry
……………

http://www.americaabroadmedia.org/about-aam/advisory-board


November 8, 2010
I investigated the political sympathies of every power player on two boards of directors: that of NPR itself, and that of the NPR Foundation, which controls the flow of private money from donors to NPR.
Why would almost all these people be liberal Democrats?
All the others are overwhelmingly, and most of them are exclusively, Democratic and liberal.

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/251647/public-radio-s-political-sympathies-matthew-shaffer


The Emerging Progressive Media Network
The majority of progressive foundation support for media goes to public radio and television.

http://www.inthesetimes.com/images/29/12/progressivemap.pdf


Federal Communications Commission (FCC) chairman Michael Copps declared that we need a PBSS-”a Public Broadcasting System on Steroids”.

http://www.aim.org/aim-column/pro-obama-group-demands-socialist-media/


So, American Abroad Media is proclaiming that al Qaeda was responsible for bombing the Cole even if it makes Bill Clinton or Obama look bad. Since NPR is pro-liberal and would not logically do such a thing, the only logical conclusion is that Israel did indeed hit the Cole.
 

Latest posts

Top