• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Eligibility case in 10 Circuit, SCOTUS conference

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Craig v. United States: Citizenship Definition Case in 10th Circuit, SCOTUS Conference

Mon, Jul 6, 200910 Comments.
Oklahoma resident and Plaintiff pro se Steven L. Craig has been pushing a little-known case through the American Judiciary wherein he is petitioning the United States government that the lack of a natural born citizenship definition combined with Congress’ unwillingness to specifically define the term should lead the Court to grant “[a]n immediate Order of Declaratory Judgement expressing Courts Opinion of the Constitutional and Legal Definition of ‘Natural born Citizen’.”

Here is a copy of Mr. Craig’s Second Amended Complaint:

http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=6504

This case is based upon the "Law of Nations", a published work of general use by the Framers.


The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it

http://www.kingdom-hawaii.org/Citizen-Native.html
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Thus, the status of natural born citizen is conditional upon being born “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States -- a condition not required under the common law. This national rule prevents us from interpreting natural-born citizen under common law rules because it eliminates the possibility of a child being born with more than one allegiance.

§ 212. Citizens and natives.

The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.



§ 215. Children of citizens born in a foreign country.

It is asked whether the children born of citizens in a foreign country are citizens? . . . By the law of nature alone, children follow the condition of their fathers, and enter into all their rights (§ 212); the place of birth produces no change in this particular, and cannot, of itself, furnish any reason for taking from a child what nature has given him.
http://www.worldandi.com/subscribers/feature_detail.asp?num=26823


Obama has admitted to being a dual citizen
“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.

http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate
 

Tex

Well-known member
Do any of you think that this was the reason Justice Roberts, who can say anything well, really screwed up the Inauguration?

This issue will not come up before the SCOTUS as it is pretty much settled. Obama ran on a populist platform (although real results are yet to be seen) and this didn't sit well with the oligarch's hand on our nation.

Robert's swearing in of Obama solidified Obama's claim to qualifications and that is exactly what the Supreme Court Chief Justice swearing in the President is supposed to do.

This is a non issue except for those who didn't do due diligence which is exactly where Roberts will find himself on the issue.

Tex
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
The man is knowingly and willingly violating the very Constitution that he swore to uphold for personal gain. At the very least, he should be given the same treatement given the ex Hondouran Pres.
 

Mike

Well-known member
Hard to figure why John McCain's citizenship issue was brought before the Senate for a resolution when everyone knew beforehand that he was born to U.S. citizens that were serving time in the military on a military base, and Buckwheat's questionability has not even been discussed by the Senate that I'm aware of......................

The whole deal is shady. :roll:
 
Top