hypocritexposer
Well-known member
Craig v. United States: Citizenship Definition Case in 10th Circuit, SCOTUS Conference
Mon, Jul 6, 200910 Comments.
Oklahoma resident and Plaintiff pro se Steven L. Craig has been pushing a little-known case through the American Judiciary wherein he is petitioning the United States government that the lack of a natural born citizenship definition combined with Congress’ unwillingness to specifically define the term should lead the Court to grant “[a]n immediate Order of Declaratory Judgement expressing Courts Opinion of the Constitutional and Legal Definition of ‘Natural born Citizen’.”
Here is a copy of Mr. Craig’s Second Amended Complaint:
http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=6504
This case is based upon the "Law of Nations", a published work of general use by the Framers.
The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it
http://www.kingdom-hawaii.org/Citizen-Native.html