• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

emotions

backhoeboogie

Well-known member
Let me explain it to you folks once more.

If you go to your doctor for problems and without tests your doctor tells you, "we're going to look in to it" but you are scheduled for heart sugery in the morning, what are you going to do?

All thru Obama's election campaign and during the debates he repetitively stated, "We're looking in to it but" or else "we're going to look in to it but" and then gave a position. Folks that simply meant he did not know all aspects about what he was talking about. But he was cheered on. He was cheered on even in this forum.

Obama is still not informed and does not have a clue as to the ramifications of the actions he has implemented. He can come back and tell us AGAIN that he had bad information. He chose the sources that gave him bad information.

This fool got elected. He is our president. He is running around in the country now repeating the same old same old over and over. It worked during the elections but he cannot dupe people over and over. Some have finally caught on.

If you hear some new concept come out of his mouth, you are simply not informed or you haven't read or studied the issues.
 

hopalong

Well-known member
My question is!
How does he or the liberal followers think that you can come up with a plan to fix such a complex issue as health care in such a short period of time, without extensive research???

I have seen more thought going into buying truck, or going on vacation that what obama has put into this!
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
The man speaks and CBO says, "That isn't true".
The man speaks and AARP says, "That isn't true".
The man speaks and ACS says, "That isn't true".
Yet the man speaks
 

backhoeboogie

Well-known member
Lets even get more simplistic.

Name one thing he has done that improves the quality of your life.

Name one thing he has done that improves your household income.

I have negatives for both issues, and proof thereof.
 

jigs

Well-known member
he would make my life a bit easier if he went to Ford's Theater... but take joe, Hillary, nancy, dirty harry, and al gore with him.... teddy could go, but I would rather someone wreck him off a bridge.
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
badaxemoo said:
backhoeboogie said:
Lets even get more simplistic.

I am not sure that is possible.

He's trying to stoop to a level that libs can understand. The problem is that "simplistic" has three syllables and is hard to say with a mouthful of goverment cheese whereas "change" has one syllable and lends itself much easier to glazed-eye chanting.
 
Top