"en banc" hearing denied in Pickett case

[Econ101]

How could you identify "opinionated garbage" when that's what your entire posts are? You've never backed anything with supporting facts.




~SH~

Do have any more posts that are on topic?

 

[Anonymous]

You tell me?

What did my bet with Sandman have to do with this topic?



~SH~

 

[Econ101]

You tell me?

What did my bet with Sandman have to do with this topic?



~SH~

It just showed you were not able to bring up "facts" on this forum, which was my contention you argued with.

 

[Anonymous]

Kindergarten: "It just showed you were not able to bring up "facts" on this forum, which was my contention you argued with."

Hahaha!

You are such a cheap talker. I prove myself wrong and willingly admit it and you think that is going to discredit the facts I bring to this forum due to your inability to contradict anything I have stated with facts to the contrary?

Hahaha! Such a childlike imagination!



~SH~