Steve
Well-known member
Just a thought on the Platypus.....is Darwinism wrong?
So either it was Created?....
or it does not exist?....
While I can not ignore science,,,,I also can not ignore thier inability to explain flaws in thier theories.....
Scientists initially considered the platypus to be 'primitive', but then they discovered the incredibly complex electrolocation techniques the animal uses to find food. To evolutionists this made it a 'highly evolved animal and not a primitive transition between reptiles and mammals.'6
The platypus, along with its fellow monotreme, the echidna, was believed to have evolved in isolation when the land mass that would become Australia broke away from the other continents supposedly 225 million years ago.7 This idea of evolution in isolation followed the theory of Darwin,
However, the discovery in the early 1990s of three platypus teeth in South America—almost identical to fossil platypus teeth found in Australia—threw that theory upside down.9 (Marsupials, too, were once considered to be exclusive to Australia, but their fossils have now been found on every continent.),
In reality, there is nothing in the fossil record to indicate that the platypus was ever anything other than a platypus.
So either it was Created?....
or it does not exist?....
While I can not ignore science,,,,I also can not ignore thier inability to explain flaws in thier theories.....