• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

For shame

Help Support Ranchers.net:

Disagreeable

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 4, 2005
Messages
2,464
Reaction score
0
Shame on President Bush. He stood in front of these people and assured them that wiretapping required a warrent and all the while he was wiretapping without one. And he has the nerve to call leaking this unlawful program a shameful act. A bald face liar. Links below comments; my emphasis.

"04/20/2004-Secondly, there are such things as roving wiretaps. Now, by the way, any time you hear the United States government talking about wiretap, it requires-a wiretap requires a court order. Nothing has changed, by the way. When we're talking about chasing down terrorists, we're talking about getting a court order before we do so. It's important for our fellow citizens to understand, when you think Patriot Act, constitutional guarantees are in place when it comes to doing what is necessary to protect our homeland, because we value the Constitution.”

http://www.vote-smart.org/speech_detail.php?speech_id=33849&keyword=wiretap&phrase=&contain=

"‘Let me -- that's a great question. A couple of things that are very important for you to understand about the Patriot Act. First of all, any action that takes place by law enforcement requires a court order. In other words, the government can't move on wiretaps or roving wiretaps without getting a court order.”

http://www.vote-smart.org/speech_detail.php?speech_id=50711&keyword=wiretap&phrase=&contain=
 

Latest posts

Top