• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

For Shamwow

loomixguy

Well-known member
Last chance, shammy. You have yet to answer any of the questions I have asked you, so now it's my chance to be an idiotic moron. Here goes....

Who killed Nick Berg?
What is the religion of his killers?
Why did they kill Nick Berg?

Now, Shammy, you can't refute that Nick Berg was killed, cause it's been all over the internet since the day he was killed, maybe even on your fave, youtube.

Waiting.....
 

Steve

Well-known member
Dhabīḥah


Paul Marshall Johnson, Jr

Jack Hensley

Daniel Pearl

Eugene Armstrong

Nicholas Evan Berg

Kenneth Bigley

Kim Sun-il

Shosei Koda

Piotr Stańczak

Margaret Hassan
 

loomixguy

Well-known member
Shamwow......I'm waiting here.......I guess the next time I'm in Courtland I'll have to run you down (in my black helicopter) and buy your whacked out azz a beer at Pinky's.
 

jigs

Well-known member
I like your signature....but why is the sherriff minutes away?? busy counting his bribe money?? pompous old fat sherriffs need a under the table retirement fund!
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
loomixguy said:
Last chance, shammy. You have yet to answer any of the questions I have asked you, so now it's my chance to be an idiotic moron. Here goes....

Who killed Nick Berg?
What is the religion of his killers?
Why did they kill Nick Berg?

Now, Shammy, you can't refute that Nick Berg was killed, cause it's been all over the internet since the day he was killed, maybe even on your fave, youtube.

Waiting.....

it is sad what happened to Nick. of course it would have never happened if we had not invaded Iraq over lies about wmd's and brainwashed americans who thought somehow 9/11 and the anthrax was done by Iraq somehow.

We invaded a muslim country. thus, the muslims are going to kill a few too. that is called war. nick was jewish and was singled out over it. this is because the muslims know the jews were behind the attacks. also abu gharad prison abuses done by our soldiers got some payback done over nick.

israel is not our allie. when you understand how they have hijacked our government you will understand this. they have also hijacked our media. most of you will never understand this but it has been told to you...it is up to you to try to prove me wrong. who was in the administration that had double citizenships during bush. israel citizens and us citizens....who were they working for? who is in there now that is a double citizen right next to obama? how much money do we give israel each year? do they have nukes? were mossad agents arrested on 9/11?
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
shaumei said:
loomixguy said:
Last chance, shammy. You have yet to answer any of the questions I have asked you, so now it's my chance to be an idiotic moron. Here goes....

Who killed Nick Berg?
What is the religion of his killers?
Why did they kill Nick Berg?

Now, Shammy, you can't refute that Nick Berg was killed, cause it's been all over the internet since the day he was killed, maybe even on your fave, youtube.

Waiting.....

it is sad what happened to Nick. of course it would have never happened if we had not invaded Iraq over lies about wmd's and brainwashed americans who thought somehow 9/11 and the anthrax was done by Iraq somehow.

We invaded a muslim country. thus, the muslims are going to kill a few too. that is called war. nick was jewish and was singled out over it. this is because the muslims know the jews were behind the attacks. also abu gharad prison abuses done by our soldiers got some payback done over nick.

israel is not our allie. when you understand how they have hijacked our government you will understand this. they have also hijacked our media. most of you will never understand this but it has been told to you...it is up to you to try to prove me wrong. who was in the administration that had double citizenships during bush. israel citizens and us citizens....who were they working for? who is in there now that is a double citizen right next to obama? how much money do we give israel each year? do they have nukes? were mossad agents arrested on 9/11?

How do you know there were no WMD's?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
if we had found any WMD's bush would have made sure the Cia controlled mass media would have published it with video and photos all over the place..we did not find the ones they promised they KNEW WERE THERE.

it was a lie. bush could be tried for murder according to Bugliosi the Manson prosecutor whom wrote a book about it.
 

jigs

Well-known member
shaumei said:
if we had found any WMD's bush would have made sure the Cia controlled mass media would have published it with video and photos all over the place..we did not find the ones they promised they KNEW WERE THERE.

it was a lie. bush could be tried for murder according to Bugliosi the Manson prosecutor whom wrote a book about it.

if that is true, Obama could be hung for treason...he is not legally the POTUS.

at least Bush treated the office with dignity and respect....two things that buckwheat has no idea about
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
shaumei said:
if we had found any WMD's bush would have made sure the Cia controlled mass media would have published it with video and photos all over the place..we did not find the ones they promised they KNEW WERE THERE.

it was a lie. bush could be tried for murder according to Bugliosi the Manson prosecutor whom wrote a book about it.


The CIA must all be jewish. :lol:
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
shaumei said:
if we had found any WMD's bush would have made sure the Cia controlled mass media would have published it with video and photos all over the place..we did not find the ones they promised they KNEW WERE THERE.

it was a lie. bush could be tried for murder according to Bugliosi the Manson prosecutor whom wrote a book about it.

What a sucker and useful idiot you proved to be Shamu!!!!

Of course the WMD's were there. Bush had them transferred to Isreal and the Jew Media reported just what he wanted reported AND YOU BELIEVED THEM !!!!

Now, what seems more likely Shamu.....there were no WMD's there or that the same government that pulled off the 9-11 attacks and made the world believe a bunch of muslims did it, couldn't also stage WMD's in Iraq if they needed to do so? It just doesn't stand up to logic.

The WMD's were there but you fell for the ruse. Good job Shamu. I've now lost all respect for your conspiratorial detection skills.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Whitewing said:
shaumei said:
loomixguy said:
Last chance, shammy. You have yet to answer any of the questions I have asked you, so now it's my chance to be an idiotic moron. Here goes....

Who killed Nick Berg?
What is the religion of his killers?
Why did they kill Nick Berg?

Now, Shammy, you can't refute that Nick Berg was killed, cause it's been all over the internet since the day he was killed, maybe even on your fave, youtube.

Waiting.....

it is sad what happened to Nick. of course it would have never happened if we had not invaded Iraq over lies about wmd's and brainwashed americans who thought somehow 9/11 and the anthrax was done by Iraq somehow.

We invaded a muslim country. thus, the muslims are going to kill a few too. that is called war. nick was jewish and was singled out over it. this is because the muslims know the jews were behind the attacks. also abu gharad prison abuses done by our soldiers got some payback done over nick.

israel is not our allie. when you understand how they have hijacked our government you will understand this. they have also hijacked our media. most of you will never understand this but it has been told to you...it is up to you to try to prove me wrong. who was in the administration that had double citizenships during bush. israel citizens and us citizens....who were they working for? who is in there now that is a double citizen right next to obama? how much money do we give israel each year? do they have nukes? were mossad agents arrested on 9/11?

How do you know there were no WMD's?

Bush said so- unless he was lying on that too.... :roll:

•President Bush, White House press conference, August 21, 2006.
AMY GOODMAN: On Monday, Present Bush admitted the Iraq war is "straining the psyche of our country," but he vowed to stay the course. A reporter questioned him about why he opposed withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq.

REPORTER: A lot of the consequences you mentioned for pulling out seem like maybe they never would have been there if we hadn’t gone in. How do you square all of that?

PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH: I square it, because—imagine a world in which you had Saddam Hussein who had the capacity to make a weapon of mass destruction, who was paying suiciders to kill innocent life, who would—who had relations with Zarqawi. Imagine what the world would be like with him in power. The idea is to try to help change the Middle East.

Now, look, I didn’t—part of the reason we went into Iraq was—the main reason we went into Iraq at the time was we thought he had weapons of mass destruction. It turns out he didn’t, but he had the capacity to make weapons of mass destruction. But I also talked about the human suffering in Iraq, and I also talked the need to advance a freedom agenda. And so my question—my answer to your question is, is that—imagine a world in which Saddam Hussein was there, stirring up even more trouble in a part of the world that had so much resentment and so much hatred that people came and killed 3,000 of our citizens.

You know, I’ve heard this theory about, you know, everything was just fine until we arrived, and then, you know, kind of that we’re going to stir up the hornet’s nest theory. It just—just doesn’t hold water, as far as I’m concerned. The terrorists attacked us and killed 3,000 of our citizens before we started the freedom agenda in the Middle East.

REPORTER: What did Iraq have to do with that?

PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH: What did Iraq have to do with what?

REPORTER: The attack on the World Trade Center?

PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH: Nothing, except for it’s part of—and nobody has ever suggested in this administration that Saddam Hussein ordered the attack. Iraq was a—Iraq—the lesson of September the 11th is, take threats before they fully materialize, Ken. Nobody has ever suggested that the attacks of September the 11th were ordered by Iraq.

AMY GOODMAN: President Bush at his news conference yesterday.


Iraq war my biggest regret, Bush admits

Suzanne Goldenberg in Washington The Guardian,
Tuesday 2 December 2008

George Bush, in a moment of reflection ahead of his departure from the White House, last night admitted that the decision to go to war against Saddam Hussein on the basis of flawed intelligence was the biggest regret of his presidency. The acknowledgment marks the first time that Bush has publicly expressed doubts about his rationale for going to war on Iraq.

In the run-up to the war, the White House adopted a position of absolute certainty that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction, basing its arguments on intelligence that was later exposed as flimsy and wrong.

"The biggest regret of all the presidency has to have been the intelligence failure in Iraq," Bush told ABC television in an interview scheduled for broadcast last night. "I wish the intelligence had been different, I guess." But he followed that moment of candour with an attempt to try to deflect charges that the White House misled Congress and the public to build a case for war, arguing that there had been widespread belief that Saddam had a nuclear arsenal.

"It wasn't just people in my administration; a lot of members in Congress, prior to my arrival in Washington DC, during the debate on Iraq, a lot of leaders of nations around the world, were all looking at the same intelligence."
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
thanks Oldtimer. we are dealing with a bunch of brainwashed idiots on this site that i am trying to educate...i hope you understand that 9/11 was an inside job...done by the same group that did OKC and JFK for that matter...our CIA primarily...
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
Whitewing said:
shaumei said:
it is sad what happened to Nick. of course it would have never happened if we had not invaded Iraq over lies about wmd's and brainwashed americans who thought somehow 9/11 and the anthrax was done by Iraq somehow.

We invaded a muslim country. thus, the muslims are going to kill a few too. that is called war. nick was jewish and was singled out over it. this is because the muslims know the jews were behind the attacks. also abu gharad prison abuses done by our soldiers got some payback done over nick.

israel is not our allie. when you understand how they have hijacked our government you will understand this. they have also hijacked our media. most of you will never understand this but it has been told to you...it is up to you to try to prove me wrong. who was in the administration that had double citizenships during bush. israel citizens and us citizens....who were they working for? who is in there now that is a double citizen right next to obama? how much money do we give israel each year? do they have nukes? were mossad agents arrested on 9/11?

How do you know there were no WMD's?

Bush said so- unless he was lying on that too.... :roll:

•President Bush, White House press conference, August 21, 2006.
AMY GOODMAN: On Monday, Present Bush admitted the Iraq war is "straining the psyche of our country," but he vowed to stay the course. A reporter questioned him about why he opposed withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq.

REPORTER: A lot of the consequences you mentioned for pulling out seem like maybe they never would have been there if we hadn’t gone in. How do you square all of that?

PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH: I square it, because—imagine a world in which you had Saddam Hussein who had the capacity to make a weapon of mass destruction, who was paying suiciders to kill innocent life, who would—who had relations with Zarqawi. Imagine what the world would be like with him in power. The idea is to try to help change the Middle East.

Now, look, I didn’t—part of the reason we went into Iraq was—the main reason we went into Iraq at the time was we thought he had weapons of mass destruction. It turns out he didn’t, but he had the capacity to make weapons of mass destruction. But I also talked about the human suffering in Iraq, and I also talked the need to advance a freedom agenda. And so my question—my answer to your question is, is that—imagine a world in which Saddam Hussein was there, stirring up even more trouble in a part of the world that had so much resentment and so much hatred that people came and killed 3,000 of our citizens.

You know, I’ve heard this theory about, you know, everything was just fine until we arrived, and then, you know, kind of that we’re going to stir up the hornet’s nest theory. It just—just doesn’t hold water, as far as I’m concerned. The terrorists attacked us and killed 3,000 of our citizens before we started the freedom agenda in the Middle East.

REPORTER: What did Iraq have to do with that?

PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH: What did Iraq have to do with what?

REPORTER: The attack on the World Trade Center?

PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH: Nothing, except for it’s part of—and nobody has ever suggested in this administration that Saddam Hussein ordered the attack. Iraq was a—Iraq—the lesson of September the 11th is, take threats before they fully materialize, Ken. Nobody has ever suggested that the attacks of September the 11th were ordered by Iraq.

AMY GOODMAN: President Bush at his news conference yesterday.


Iraq war my biggest regret, Bush admits

Suzanne Goldenberg in Washington The Guardian,
Tuesday 2 December 2008

George Bush, in a moment of reflection ahead of his departure from the White House, last night admitted that the decision to go to war against Saddam Hussein on the basis of flawed intelligence was the biggest regret of his presidency. The acknowledgment marks the first time that Bush has publicly expressed doubts about his rationale for going to war on Iraq.

In the run-up to the war, the White House adopted a position of absolute certainty that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction, basing its arguments on intelligence that was later exposed as flimsy and wrong.

"The biggest regret of all the presidency has to have been the intelligence failure in Iraq," Bush told ABC television in an interview scheduled for broadcast last night. "I wish the intelligence had been different, I guess." But he followed that moment of candour with an attempt to try to deflect charges that the White House misled Congress and the public to build a case for war, arguing that there had been widespread belief that Saddam had a nuclear arsenal.

"It wasn't just people in my administration; a lot of members in Congress, prior to my arrival in Washington DC, during the debate on Iraq, a lot of leaders of nations around the world, were all looking at the same intelligence."

Zoom! (at OT):lol:

Of course he lied about the WMD's not being there. If he lied to get us into the war, why wouldn't he lie about the WMD's?

As Steve has pointed out, the same CIA that pulled off the Kennedy Assassination, the OKC bombings, and the 9-11 attacks couldn't plant a few, heck, even ONE, WMD in a million square miles of Iraqi desert for our troops to find? :roll:

This was the perfect conspriacy folks. Bush claimed the WMD's were there and we went to war for the Jews. The Jew media did everything possible to support our invasion.

Once we'd recovered the the WMD's and transferred them to our Jew masters in Isreal, Bush then made the perfect claim.......that there were none and guys like Shamu believed him and the Jew media.

I can't believe Shamu and SlowTimer think Bush lied to get us into the war yet believe he'd tell the truth once we were there and supposedly couldn't find the WMD's we were searching for. Just doesn't add up and I'm betting there's youtube evidence that will back me up.

Bush is an evil genius and this perfectly executed plan proves it.
 

Steve

Well-known member
Steve said:
Once we'd recovered the the WMD's and transferred them to our Jew masters in Israel,

and once we pull out of Iraq, Israel can use them on Iran and blame Iraq,

and soros can cash in on high gas prices again... he will then pay off Palin, get her elected and drill for oil in Cuba (the 59th state) ...

and shampooie will be killed trying to take a hostage at a local newspaper,.. who wouldn't print his yardsale classified ad.. :? :? :???:

yep it all adds up now.. thanks for opening our eyes to the possibilities.. (and potential stock picks)..
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
Steve said:
Steve said:
Once we'd recovered the the WMD's and transferred them to our Jew masters in Israel,

and once we pull out of Iraq, Israel can use them on Iran and blame Iraq,

and soros can cash in on high gas prices again... he will then pay off Palin, get her elected and drill for oil in Cuba (the 59th state) ...

and shampooie will be killed trying to take a hostage at a local newspaper,.. who wouldn't print his yardsale classified ad.. :? :? :???:

yep it all adds up now.. thanks for opening our eyes to the possibilities.. (and potential stock picks)..

You have a keen mind Steve AND a position in a future Shamu administration.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Steve said:
Steve said:
Once we'd recovered the the WMD's and transferred them to our Jew masters in Israel,

and once we pull out of Iraq, Israel can use them on Iran and blame Iraq,

and soros can cash in on high gas prices again... he will then pay off Palin, get her elected and drill for oil in Cuba (the 59th state) ...

and shampooie will be killed trying to take a hostage at a local newspaper,.. who wouldn't print his yardsale classified ad.. :? :? :???:

yep it all adds up now.. thanks for opening our eyes to the possibilities.. (and potential stock picks)..

Steve,

I have said none of those things...you cannot take on my actual statements as you will have real problems with those....you are an embarrassment to our past military greats...
 

Whitewing

Well-known member
So Shamu, are you going to admit it?

You believe the lying Bush AND you believe the Jew media that there were no WMD's in Iraq, right?

And, you must therefore also believe that our CIA, under the control of Bush, could not plant a few WMD's in a million square miles of desert, right?

You should be ashamed to show your tin-fold-covered pate to your fellow conspiracy nuts. What an embarrassment and tool you are.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Whitewing said:
So Shamu, are you going to admit it?

You believe the lying Bush AND you believe the Jew media that there were no WMD's in Iraq, right?

And, you must therefore also believe that our CIA, under the control of Bush, could not plant a few WMD's in a million square miles of desert, right?

You should be ashamed to show your tin-fold-covered pate to your fellow conspiracy nuts. What an embarrassment and tool you are.

it does not matter what I believe as the evidence is the evidence. if they planted the wmd's we would have gotten them there.

you see, there are some of us you cannot fool..people like yourself are easily fooled. others of us that know the facts...what is sad is how you defend these people as if they represent who we are as a country which is the furthest from the truth.
 

hopalong

Well-known member
shaumei said:
Whitewing said:
So Shamu, are you going to admit it?

You believe the lying Bush AND you believe the Jew media that there were no WMD's in Iraq, right?

And, you must therefore also believe that our CIA, under the control of Bush, could not plant a few WMD's in a million square miles of desert, right?

You should be ashamed to show your tin-fold-covered pate to your fellow conspiracy nuts. What an embarrassment and tool you are.

it does not matter what I believe as the evidence is the evidence. if they planted the wmd's we would have gotten them there.

you see, there are some of us you cannot fool..people like yourself are easily fooled. others of us that know the facts...what is sad is how you defend these people as if they represent who we are as a country which is the furthest from the truth.

Your are the one who is so easily fooled, utube and your antenna wearing friends leading you down a path of ignorance, i do not believe you are ignorant just gullible
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
hopalong,

i have a history of being very good at looking at evidence...i am a cpa and during my college years i was president of the accounting society...my fellow students believed in me..in high school i graduated the top in my class...

i do not need to hear anything from anyone....i look at evidence...books, radio, videos, papers, etc...
 
Top