Sandhusker
Well-known member
Do you remember this?;
~SH~ wrote:
Ahhh....what's wrong Sandbag? Can't back your position AGAIN?
What are we sending them now? Bring the data!
What do we normally send them? Bring the data!
Why are we sending them less? Bring the data!
Did I call the diversion or what? Gee as if Sandbag would actually back a position with supporting facts. Hahaha! Heaven forbid, he's an R-CULTer, what did you expect?
~SH~
I replied, "We sent them 160T in August, 1200T in Sept. We used to send them over 20,000T/mo. If you do the math, you will see that our Sept. shipments were only 6% of what we used to send. That's how Agman gets them to scrample - only cut loose 6%. If you cut the supply of pet boa constricors, some folks will be lining up for them, too."
"We are sending them less because the USDA forgot their "sound science" requirement they've been spouting off about and got us in a deal where we can't possibly supply what we used to."
"You wanted data from a R-CALF member? You got it. Now how are you going to make an ass out of yourself? Oooops foolish question, you've always succeeded before. I'm sure you'll find a way again."
-----------------------------------------------
Let me recap;
1) You demanded proof of my statement.
2) You made an ass of yourself, per your custom.
3) I brought facts to prove my statement (which, incidentally, also proves you to be a liar since you've said that I never bring facts to back my statements)
4) You ran off, never to respond to that thread again.
Today, you're back demanding I back a statement and acting like an ass again and again and again. With the above posts as reference, why should I? You're a childish punk and you'll get treated as such. I'll tell you what I tell my 8 & 10 year olds since you're at their maturity level, YOU GET WHAT YOU GIVE.
~SH~ wrote:
Ahhh....what's wrong Sandbag? Can't back your position AGAIN?
What are we sending them now? Bring the data!
What do we normally send them? Bring the data!
Why are we sending them less? Bring the data!
Did I call the diversion or what? Gee as if Sandbag would actually back a position with supporting facts. Hahaha! Heaven forbid, he's an R-CULTer, what did you expect?
~SH~
I replied, "We sent them 160T in August, 1200T in Sept. We used to send them over 20,000T/mo. If you do the math, you will see that our Sept. shipments were only 6% of what we used to send. That's how Agman gets them to scrample - only cut loose 6%. If you cut the supply of pet boa constricors, some folks will be lining up for them, too."
"We are sending them less because the USDA forgot their "sound science" requirement they've been spouting off about and got us in a deal where we can't possibly supply what we used to."
"You wanted data from a R-CALF member? You got it. Now how are you going to make an ass out of yourself? Oooops foolish question, you've always succeeded before. I'm sure you'll find a way again."
-----------------------------------------------
Let me recap;
1) You demanded proof of my statement.
2) You made an ass of yourself, per your custom.
3) I brought facts to prove my statement (which, incidentally, also proves you to be a liar since you've said that I never bring facts to back my statements)
4) You ran off, never to respond to that thread again.
Today, you're back demanding I back a statement and acting like an ass again and again and again. With the above posts as reference, why should I? You're a childish punk and you'll get treated as such. I'll tell you what I tell my 8 & 10 year olds since you're at their maturity level, YOU GET WHAT YOU GIVE.