• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Freedom of Information Act

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
In an attempt to deliver on pledges of a transparent government, Obama said he would change the way the federal government interprets the Freedom of Information Act. He said he was directing agencies that vet requests for information to err on the side of making information public — not to look for reasons to legally withhold it — an alteration to the traditional standard of evaluation.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28767687/?GT1=43001

So will this mean we will finally see the original birth certificate?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
hypocritexposer said:
In an attempt to deliver on pledges of a transparent government, Obama said he would change the way the federal government interprets the Freedom of Information Act. He said he was directing agencies that vet requests for information to err on the side of making information public — not to look for reasons to legally withhold it — an alteration to the traditional standard of evaluation.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28767687/?GT1=43001

So will this mean we will finally see the original birth certificate?

You mean Vice President Cheny- acting as President of the the Senate- certified Barack H. Obama as the qualified, elected President of the United States--and that Chief Justice Roberts swore him in as such--and their was a question in their mind?...

IF SO- IT IS PURE MALFEASANCE OF OFFICE- AND THEIR SWORN DUTY- and I think you should be raising hell. Must be a huge right wingnut/left wingnut/ plain old wingnut conspiracy :wink: :lol: :lol: :lol: :p
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
hypocritexposer said:
In an attempt to deliver on pledges of a transparent government, Obama said he would change the way the federal government interprets the Freedom of Information Act. He said he was directing agencies that vet requests for information to err on the side of making information public — not to look for reasons to legally withhold it — an alteration to the traditional standard of evaluation.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28767687/?GT1=43001

So will this mean we will finally see the original birth certificate?

You mean Vice President Cheny- acting as President of the the Senate- certified Barack H. Obama as the qualified, elected President of the United States--and that Chief Justice Roberts swore him in as such--and their was a question in their mind?...

IF SO- IT IS PURE MALFEASANCE OF OFFICE- AND THEIR SWORN DUTY- and I think you should be raising hell. Must be a huge right wingnut/left wingnut/ plain old wingnut conspiracy :wink: :lol: :lol: :lol: :p

So what you're telling us is if the criminal doesn't get caught, there's no crime. The criminal assumes no responsibility for the crime.

Where does the Constitution state that the Vice President can override Constitutional requirements?
 

loomixguy

Well-known member
What this means is that P-BO just opened the door to making it easier for the so called World Court to bring alleged war crimes charges against W and Cheney. W did the exact opposite when first in office to shield the Klinton's from public scrutiny...something most Presidents will do, if deemed necessary, to somewhat protect an outgoing former President.

Maybe the same order may help put nails in P-BO's coffin. It's just a matter of time until this slick empty suit steps on his boto.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
loomixguy said:
What this means is that P-BO just opened the door to making it easier for the so called World Court to bring alleged war crimes charges against W and Cheney. W did the exact opposite when first in office to shield the Klinton's from public scrutiny...something most Presidents will do, if deemed necessary, to somewhat protect an outgoing former President.

Maybe the same order may help put nails in P-BO's coffin. It's just a matter of time until this slick empty suit steps on his boto.

According to even the investigations conducted by the US military ( Major General Taguba and the military investigaors) and the International Red Cross, along with other Interational authorities--GW and or members of his Administration were in violation of not only Military Law, but International Law and someone should have to answer for it......
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
loomixguy said:
What this means is that P-BO just opened the door to making it easier for the so called World Court to bring alleged war crimes charges against W and Cheney. W did the exact opposite when first in office to shield the Klinton's from public scrutiny...something most Presidents will do, if deemed necessary, to somewhat protect an outgoing former President.

Maybe the same order may help put nails in P-BO's coffin. It's just a matter of time until this slick empty suit steps on his boto.

According to even the investigations conducted by the US military ( Major General Taguba and the military investigaors) and the International Red Cross, along with other Interational authorities--GW and or members of his Administration were in violation of not only Military Law, but International Law and someone should have to answer for it......

The US Constitution recognizes International Law?
 

loomixguy

Well-known member
Isn't Taguba the Filipino? That tells me all I need to know about that.

Wonder how many kabits he is supporting? And how many of his sidecars they have?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Sandhusker said:
Oldtimer said:
loomixguy said:
What this means is that P-BO just opened the door to making it easier for the so called World Court to bring alleged war crimes charges against W and Cheney. W did the exact opposite when first in office to shield the Klinton's from public scrutiny...something most Presidents will do, if deemed necessary, to somewhat protect an outgoing former President.

Maybe the same order may help put nails in P-BO's coffin. It's just a matter of time until this slick empty suit steps on his boto.

According to even the investigations conducted by the US military ( Major General Taguba and the military investigaors) and the International Red Cross, along with other Interational authorities--GW and or members of his Administration were in violation of not only Military Law, but International Law and someone should have to answer for it......

The US Constitution recognizes International Law?

The US did-GW did- Congress did-- thru the Geneva Convention and many other such agreements including the Bosnian agreement (under Bush)...The US used that as a way of going into the Bosnian/ Sibernecia/Yugoslave area and bring Slobodan Milosevic, along with many others to the International Court of Justice for violating International Law...
Is this another George Bush- do as we say- don't do as we do type law :???: We'll agree to International Law when we like it- not when its my arse (GW's) on the line :???:

On 27 June 2005, during the 109th Congress, the United States House of Representatives passed a resolution (H. Res. 199 sponsored by Congressman Christopher Smith with 39 cosponsors) commemorating the 10th anniversary of the Srebrenica genocide. The resolution, as amended, was passed with an overwhelming majority of 370 - YES votes, 1 - NO vote, and 62 - ABSENT.The resolution is a bipartisan measure commemorating July 11, 1995-2005, the tenth anniversary of the Srebrenica massacre. The Senate version, S.Res.134, was introduced by Senator Gordon Smith and was agreed to in the Senate on 22 June 2005 without amendment and with unanimous consent. The summaries of the resolutions are identical, with the exception of the name of the house passing the resolution:

Expresses the sense of the [House of Representatives]/[Senate] that that:

(1) the thousands of innocent people executed at Srebrenica in Bosnia and Herzegovina in July 1995, along with all individuals who were victimized during the conflict and genocide in Bosnia and Herzegovina from 1992 to 1995, should be remembered and honored;
(2) the Serbian policies of aggression and ethnic cleansing meet the terms defining genocide;
(3) foreign nationals, including U.S. citizens, who have risked, and in some cases lost, their lives in Bosnia and Herzegovina should be remembered and honored;
(4) the United Nations (U.N.) and its member states should accept their share of responsibility for allowing the Srebrenica massacre and genocide to occur, and seek to ensure that this does not happen in future crises;
(5) it is in the U.S. national interest that the responsible individuals should be held accountable for their actions;
(6) persons indicted by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) should be apprehended and transferred to The Hague without further delay, and countries should meet their obligations to cooperate with the ICTY; and
(7) the United States should support the independence and territorial integrity of Bosnia and Herzegovina and peace and stability in southeastern Europe.
 
Top