• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

funny article on sarah palin's fancy bus

Help Support Ranchers.net:

beethoven

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 11, 2009
Messages
746
Reaction score
0
Location
alberta
While Americans Go Hungry, Sarah Palin Spends $14,000 on Stickers for Bus

http://www.politicususa.com/en/while-americans-go-hungry-sarah-palin-spends-14000-on-stickers-for-bus

July 16, 2011
By Michael Hayne

Remember when Johnny Walnuts McCain cynically thought he could siphon PUMA votes from Obama when he chose the funny talking Avon lady to be his running mate? Then do you remember how the funny talking Avon lady proceeded to spend $150,000 campaign dollars on a Neiman Marcus shopping spree so she could look real purty for all of those horny Nascar Republican dudes, which was later deemed legal by the FEC? Well, now it seems that America’s favorite winking grifter managed to spend a whopping $14,000 on crappy decal stickers for her “One Nation” East Coast bus tour, which amounted to nothing more than a premise to a National Lampoon’s Snowbilly Vacation spin-off.

Sarah Palin’s political action committee spent tens of thousands of dollars covering the costs of the former Alaska governor’s “One Nation” East Coast bus tour this spring — a trip that Palin (R) has repeatedly characterized as a “family vacation, according to the Washington Post.

But this is the almighty snow queen of the north, so the story could not possibly get any better.

According to a list of itemized expenditures filed by SarahPAC to the Federal Elections Committee and published Thursday, Palin’s committee spent nearly $14,000 on the “bus wrap,” according to the Washington Post.

In case you didn’t get that due to spitting your Starbucks latte across the computer screen, Sarah Palin squandered $14,000 to essentially pimp out an RV and make it look like a 10 year old school girl’s bookbinder on wheels–all for the exhilaration of trying to best her evil, dumber twin, Michele Bachmann, as well as to steal attention from the REAL Republican presidential candidates. After all, she’s been pimping out America for the past three years.

So while Americans are diving into dumpsters to feed their families; while citizens with advanced college degrees either remain unemployed or work at Taco Bell; while seniors are being told that they have to sacrifice their medicare in order to make rich people even richer and to keep war profiteers at Halliburton happy as two (or is it three?) pointless wars rage on; and while young women seeking birth control so as to prevent unnecessary economic burdens are being casted aside, the quitting, American history butchering grifter from Alaska is spending $14,000 on crappy stickers in a transparently vain effort to keep her ego relevant as her Reality TV star status is rapidly falling.

In short, there may be a more decisive end to cancer than this one woman’s criminally reckless behavior and blatantly hypocritical actions. In all actuality, it might have all been worth it had Sarah used one of those stickers to glue her mouth shut.
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Messages
24,216
Reaction score
0
Location
real world
$14,000, that's peanuts


the day after the "debt ceiling deadline", obama will spend what on a birthday party?


:lol: :lol:


Palin spent who's money? How many jobs did her spending in the "free market economy" create or save?
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Messages
24,216
Reaction score
0
Location
real world
beethoven said:
didnt say it was meaningful! just funny.

but it is meaningful.......


the bias the liberal media show to someone that spends their own money to create or save jobs, is quite obvious.


They would rather have the government spend taxpayer dollars, in the form of stimulus to do the same thing, so the politicians can siphon off the top.

I bet the waste and duplication is in the range of about 40%.
 

beethoven

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 11, 2009
Messages
746
Reaction score
0
Location
alberta
not sure what they would rather. i enjoy some humour tho and find moments like this to be quite good.

i cant say i react well to portions of either side. major issues with both.. very complex.
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Messages
24,216
Reaction score
0
Location
real world
beethoven said:
not sure what they would rather.

i cant say i react well to either side. major issues with both.

with the parties? Or with someone who is willing to spend their own money on promoting the constitution, while the President promotes himself?


If in Canada, we had a private citizen that was willing to drive across the country with a bus painted in patriotic garb, that they paid for themselves, and Harper that used tax dollars to promote his birthday party, would you say they were the same?
 

redrobin

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 19, 2009
Messages
1,245
Reaction score
114
Location
arkansas
beethoven said:
didnt say it was meaningful! just funny.
What part did you think funny? The condescending overtone from the author about us underlings and the unspoken notion that she's not one of us elite liberals from a new england school seems obvious. The rest of his article is mark missing humor. As hypo said 14g that michael mentions just points to the obvious billions and yea trillions that osama has spent. Her bus would remind one of obamas limo, airforce one, etc and she's closer to the rest of us in her bus. I'd say our author misses the pulse of America by a wide margin. Walnuts mccain was about the only funny part.
 

lightninboy

Well-known member
Joined
May 6, 2007
Messages
691
Reaction score
0
Location
NE South Dakota
By Michael Collins Piper
September 15 & 22, 2008
Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin—John McCain’s dynamic Republican vice presidential running mate—can be counted as a firm advocate for the interests of Israel. In fact, the Alaska governor is so energetically pro-Israel that she displays an Israeli flag in her office, a point that has received widespread attention in the Israeli press and which is now being discussed in pro-Israel journals and newspapers on American soil.

Mrs. Palin has said that America’s war in Iraq—which was orchestrated by those neo-cons in axis with their allies in Israel—is “a task that is from God.”

Critics say the war was, as former Sen. Ernest Hollings (D-S.C.) candidly asserted, not God’s will, but rather the Bush administration’s “policy to secure Israel.”

Although Democrats say Mrs. Palin is too inexperienced in foreign policy, she is being tutored on the issues by John McCain’s close friend (and his reported first choice as his preferred vice presidential running mate), Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.). He is one of Israel’s most outspoken American cheerleaders.


By Michael Collins Piper
November 3, 2008
It turns out that one of the chief neo-conservative tacticians—William Kristol, editor of Zionist billionaire Rupert Murdoch’s Weekly Standard, and Mrs. Palin’s foremost cheerleader in the mass media—is the very person who hand-picked Palin as John McCain’s running mate.

Sources in theMcCain camp, the Republican Party and Washington think tanks say Mrs. Palin was identified as a potential future leader of the neo-conservative cause in June 2007. That was when the annual summer cruise organized by the right-of-center Weekly Standard magazine docked in Juneau, the Alaskan state capital, and the pundits on board took tea with Gov. Palin.

The Post reported that the meeting between Palin and Kristol, along with Kristol hanger-on Fred Barnes, was initiated by a member of Palin’s staff.

In any event, the Telegraph added, “her case as John McCain’s running mate was later advanced vociferously by William Kristol,” whose Standard touted Palin — immediately after their meeting—as “the most popular governor” and mentioned her in subsequent issues of The Weekly Standard no less than 40 additional times.

In fact, as early as June 30—at a time when McCain was said to be resisting pressures from those who opposed McCain’s choice of Sen. Joe Lieberman as his running mate—Kristol appeared on Rupert Murdoch’s Fox News and predicted Palin would be McCain’s choice, this at a time when Palin was hardly known outside Alaska.

Underscoring the role of the “neo-cons” in grooming Palin, the small-circulation (but highly influential) New Yorker—published by the billionaire Newhouse family (hard-line Zionists known for neo-conservative sympathies)—featured an eye-opening cover story on October 27 entitled “How McCain found Palin,” subtitled “She wanted the nomination—and Washington insiders helped her get it.”

Perhaps more disturbing was the revelation that it was controversial political operative Dick Morris— who earlier helped launch Bill Clinton’s rise in Arkansas and then in the national arena—who was a key player “in” on laying the stage for the until-then-obscure Palin’s introduction to the GOP.

Morris was among another group of neo-cons— associated with the National Review magazine—who landed in Alaska on their own cruise (just a few weeks after the Kristol-Weekly Standard clique held court). The New Yorker said “according to several accounts . . . no connection made that day was more meaningful than the one struck between Palin and Dick Morris.

It is interesting the New Yorker should unveil the Palin-Morris connection resulting from the National Review stop-over in Alaska: S.I. Newhouse, publisher of the magazine, was a close friend of Morris’s cousin, devout pro-Israel political operative and “mob lawyer” Roy Cohn, who was also close friend of National Review founder William F. Buckley, Jr.

Palin’s official foreign policy handlers are two key neo-conservative strategists: Randy Scheunemann and Steve Biegun. One chronicler of the neo-conservatives, author Jacob Heilbrunn, has asserted it’s clear Palin “has soaked up the neo-con view of the world.”


ZIONISTS DEVOUR TEA PARTY
WITH PALIN TROJAN HORSE
By Brother Nathanael Kapner, Copyright 2010

The shrewd, leveraged use of avowed Zionist and Israel-lover Palin to co-opt the Tea Party should come as no surprise to anyone.

For those who still practice the dying art of ‘memory,’ you’ll recall that shortly after she was installed as (designated loser) McCain’s Vice Presidential candidate, some felt that, as an outsider, Palin might actually be someone in the American political zoo who was not on bended knee to the de facto US Government in Tel Aviv.

As we all saw in short order, it didn’t take the Alaskan huntress long to show up in what might as well have been skull cap pasties declaring her undying loyalty (Read: ‘abject subservience’) to Zionist Israel and, by extension, the ultimate Jewish ‘God’s Eye’…the Rothschilds of the City of London.

THE ‘KINDA CUTE’ TEA PARTY MOVEMENT began as a loose affiliation of a smattering of noisy American individuals and groups united in their opposition to Obama’s socialist/communist/open immigration agenda.

For some reason (hmm), the Zionist press gave this quaint, growing amalgam of fairly numerous, small, regional Tea Party-associated coffee klatches some media play. Make no mistake, most of the Party members were and are sincere grassroots noisemakers.

Over the weeks, these often disparate little power centers eventually morphed into the “Tea Party Nation,” and (hmm) invited Ex-Gov Palin to be the keynote speaker at their “First National Tea Party Convention,” (as they billed it), in Nashville Tennessee, February 4-6, 2010.

For anyone even passively capable of remembering VP Candidate Sarah’s putrid declarations of fealty to Zion and Israel, the invitation to, and acceptance by, the one-time VP candidate should have stamped ‘Case Closed’ for the Tea Party movement then and there.

But who does real research anymore? A simple 10 minute examination of the Tea Party Nation’s actual background power brokers reveals heavy Jewish lobby interests deeply penetrated into the Tea Party organism. End of story. R.I.P.

IT’S A SIMPLE FACT OF POLITICAL LIFE in America that NO viable, honest political movement shall be permitted to take ten healthy breaths before being probed thoroughly and then taken over by the Zionist political machine…which makes Dr. Frankenstein’s lab success look like Mother Theresa.

Zionism - like a political Hydra - has tentacles firmly and terminally thrust into every major power center in America. We can now add to that sorry roster, the Tea Party ‘phenomenon.’

In fact, it would not surprise this writer, if the Tea Party blip on the radar was CREATED by Zionists for a little weekend fun to siphon off and control the palpable, if not truly formidable, discontent growing among the remaining semi-conscious sheeple grazing from sea to shining sea.

In the alternate, however, if the Tea Party movement was/is a genuine spasm of political anger - with even a remote chance of causing trouble to the status (Star of David) quo - it was immediately targeted for total control and usurpation by the Zionist masters when it began to force the Jewish media to cover it. (Hence the suggestion that the Tea Party populist ‘opposition’ may have been born of Zionism chicanery and manipulation in the first place.)

Savor this: Listed on the Tea Party Nation’s own Internet Home Site as one of its leading “Resources,” is the malignant Zionist, Jewish Neocon think tank, “The American Enterprise Institute,” which pushed the US into the illegal War Of Genocide in Iraq (two million Iraqi dead) and is currently propagandizing and demanding the (US) annihilation of Iran…to protect ‘brave little Israel’ - our only ‘democratic friend’ in the Middle East.

Next up in the chain of evidence of Zionist control of the Tea Party Nation, one finds as its leading sponsor and “featured Convention speaker,” Mr. Joseph Farah, publisher of World Net Daily, a RABID Pro-Israel Internet news and propaganda service.

Palin, of course, has made it quite clear that ‘yesterday’ wouldn’t be too soon to obliterate 80 million Iranians (to feed the blood lust of Zion). Rupert Murdoch’s Fox News was also represented on the Tea Party rostrum in a joint speech with Mr. Farah - more below. Zionist money-hunter, Rep Michelle Bachman, was also on the scheduled speaker list.

Since resigning as Alaska’s governor last July and winning near goddess-like approval from the Jewish neocons’ foremost US-based character assassin and henchman, William Kristol, who called her resignation a“shrewd move,” Palin came out swinging (the melodrama begins) against Obama in her keynote address and singing out the Tea Party’s 3 core values: -1- Fiscal Responsibility -2- Constitutionally Limited Government -3- Free Markets (a grand Zionist advantage).

Murdoch, a full-fledged drooling Zionist, whose mother, Elizabeth Joy Greene, was the daughter of a wealthy Jewish family, (usually an oxymoron), brought his abiding interest and media spotlight to bear in full on Palin in mid-January 2010.

Just two weeks before her speech at the Tea Party ‘Convention’… Murdoch tabbed Palin as a Fox News “on-air contributor.”

So, in sum, there is no argument, no question whatsoever, that big Zionist Murdoch money and influence now own Palin’s immediate and, perhaps, long-term future.

Sarah’s Zionist Jewish backers not only include rapacious Rupert and his News Corporation and well connected NY Jew, Arthur M. Siskind (Senior adviser to Murdoch), but none other than…drum roll…Jacob Rothschild, as well.

Follow this one: On the Board of Directors of Murdoch’s News Corporation, is one Andrew Knight, Chairman of J. Rothschild Capital Management Limited. (JRCML is a subsidiary of RIT Capital Partners whose Executive Director is “Lord” Jacob Rothschild.)

Murdoch has already appointed a start-up contingent of Zionist-Jewish advisers to guide, train, polish and manipulate Palin as she rolls down the tracks on the Zionist Express.

“ISRAEL IS AMERICA’S CRITICAL ALLY,” declared ’sweet’ Sarah Palin from the podium to loud and dutiful applause at the Tea Party Nation’s convention last week. Yes, friends, there is only one ‘critical ally’ of the United States of America…and the Zionist state of Israel is it.

Sporting a pin on her lapel with two flags — for Israel and the United States — Palin spewed a carefully orchestrated script designed to please and make glow the Jewish lobbyists monitoring her every word. Palin gave them just what they wanted to hear: “It’s time for tough action against the dangerous regime of Iran.” (Translation: “Let’s nuke the Persian creeps and let ‘God’ sort them out.” Although I highly doubt Palin knows the difference between Persian and Arab).

Already vetted by AIPAC even before McCain ‘chose’ her as his running mate in July 2008, Palin made sure that her AIPAC pedigree is 100% secure when she told the Tea Party Convention audience, “Our President spent a year reaching out to hostile regimes and dangerous dictators. Now Israel, a proven friend, questions the strength of our support.”

Palin, knowing which side of the toast the yellow stuff goes on, then delivered a shoe-in for MILLIONS in Jewish campaign money in an interview with her media owner…er, sponsor, Fox News, only one day after her Tea Party speech:

Fox News: “Can Obama be defeated in 2012?”

Sarah Palin: “Say Obama played the war card. Say he decided to declare war on Iran. Say he decided to really come out and do whatever he could to support Israel, which I would like him to do. That would change the dynamics.”

If it’s WAR that Palin wants, then she will have no trouble getting the WAR-MONGERING Jewish lobbies and their partners in the Jewish-owned media to scream for bloody, genocidal war with her.

One wonders if the bona fide, authentic, Tea Party patriot faithful actually know what has happened to their dreams and hopes. The coup is over…it’s game, set and match to the Zionists…the Tea Party is now just another kosher media circus.

http://www.realzionistnews.com/?p=481
 

Tam

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
12,759
Reaction score
0
Location
Sask
lightninboy said:
Where does Palin get the money and time for all of this?

She is obviously SOMEBODY'S lapdog puppet.

MY GAWD do you know anything that your Conspiracy Leaders don't brainwash you with? Sarah Palin is a top selling author, TV personallity and recieves thousands of dollars to do public speaking engagements. :roll:

Since leaving office at the end of July 2009, the 2008 Republican vice presidential nominee has brought in at least 100 times her old salary – a haul now estimated at more than $12 million -- through television and book deals and a heavy schedule of speaking appearances worth five and six figures.

That conservative estimate is based on publicly available records and news accounts. The actual number is probably much higher, but is hard to quantify because Palin does not publicize her earnings. She reputedly got a $7 million deal for her first book, with the bulk of that money due after her resignation as governor, and will earn about $250,000 per episode, according to the web site The Daily Beast, for each of eight episodes of a reality show about Alaska for the The Learning Channel. She has managed to keep a lid on reliable figures for her earnings from a multi-year contract with Fox News and a second book deal with HarperCollins.

A Palin aide responding to questions from ABC News said the governor "is now a private citizen. As a result, her fees and earnings are private."

While book and television royalties are huge earners, Palin, 46, has taken on a breakneck schedule of public speaking engagements, booked through the Washington Speakers Bureau. Her typical fee is $100,000, according to a January report in Politico, though she accepts a somewhat smaller fee for events on the West Coast because they are easier to get to from Alaska. Speakers Bureau officials did not respond to emailed questions.

The only lapdog is you to your handlers. :roll:
 

Tam

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
12,759
Reaction score
0
Location
Sask
lightninboy said:
What have I said that isn't true???

I don't have that much time to waste on you besides I'm sure all the EYEWITNESS proof in the world would not un-brainwash you. :roll:
 

okfarmer

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Messages
1,059
Reaction score
0
Location
Oklahoma
This is one of the dumbest articles written and it could only be considered news worthy by someone equally as dumb.

How much was spent on an evening at the Opera? Who's money was spent on the evening at the Opera? Who's money was spent on the bus?

If this article seemed intelligent to you, Congratulations! Here's your sign.

sign.jpg
 

Tam

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
12,759
Reaction score
0
Location
Sask
lightninboy said:
Sarah Palin is a Zionist. It's all documented. Are you denying it or what?

What I am not denying is YOU SIR ARE A BRAINWASHED LOON and that is being documented right here on ranchers everytime you post. :roll:
 

beethoven

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 11, 2009
Messages
746
Reaction score
0
Location
alberta
palin started out well, but has not been able to sustain good standing. being a public figure opens the door to high levels of scrutiny, and also the dept. of mockery. that is the risk of things, that is the way that goes.

p.s as an aside, let's review:

staying on topic, and making fun of public figures is ok.

hijacking posts, and attacking posters in the forum, not appropriate.
 

hopalong

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 12, 2006
Messages
8,019
Reaction score
0
Location
Az.
Tam said:
lightninboy said:
Sarah Palin is a Zionist. It's all documented. Are you denying it or what?

What I am not denying is YOU SIR ARE A BRAINWASHED LOON and that is being documented right here on ranchers everytime you post. :roll:

Tam Tam be nice :D :D
 

Tam

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
12,759
Reaction score
0
Location
Sask
hopalong said:
Tam said:
lightninboy said:
Sarah Palin is a Zionist. It's all documented. Are you denying it or what?

What I am not denying is YOU SIR ARE A BRAINWASHED LOON and that is being documented right here on ranchers everytime you post. :roll:

Tam Tam be nice :D :D

Sorry I've tried but when hundreds of eyewitness accounts of an event can't convince a person they are way off base with their conspiracies I see no need to ignor or sugar coat the truth. :roll:
 

Tam

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
12,759
Reaction score
0
Location
Sask
beethoven said:
palin started out well, but has not been able to sustain good standing. being a public figure opens the door to high levels of scrutiny, and also the dept. of mockery. that is the risk of things, that is the way that goes.

p.s as an aside, let's review:

staying on topic, and making fun of public figures is ok.

hijacking posts, and attacking posters in the forum, not appropriate.
And why hasn't she been able to sustain good standing? :? Could it possably be because, (to use his own words) inbred weirdos like Maher and the leftwing media make up lies about her and people like you think it is funny to spread them? :roll:
Funny how when the lie is proven to be what it is a LIE the issue is just quietly dropped and the left move on to the next lie to destroy the WHOLE Palin family. I'm guessing it is because there is no morals or intregrity in the left and they could care less about the lasting affects of their lies. They sure wouldn't want to come out and admit what they have done as people might just start truly looking at why they are lieing to them about her.

BTW According to Obama what is not appropriate is dragging families into the political campaign attacks but I guess that only goes if you are a DEMOCRAT RIGHT . :x
In Palin's case, her being in a public figure has opened her entire family up to nasty name calling and lies but I guess that is ok because she is a Republican and worse yet a Strong Conservative WOMAN. :mad:

Oh and You might think it is funny to call a down syndrome child a inbred weirdo but I don't know of anyone with any common descency that does. And if you had a lick of common sense you would be holding your funny man accountable for his sick comments but somehow I doubt that will happen. :roll:
 

Latest posts

Top