• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

GONEzales

aplusmnt

Well-known member
The man should be gone, he is an idiot. He did not break the law, he was not unethical in what he did. But he made the stupid mistake of pussyfooting around with the Dems. He should have just said, the prosecutors were not pursuing things in the direction the president wanted and he removed them as was his within his authority. End of story and all Dems can bight the big one. but instead he pussyfooted around the issues and played right into the Dems hands.

So fair ridden no room for balless idiots!

And now we will have months of the Dem's making a big deal about his replacement. Just gives them some more soap box yelling and chest thumping to do instead of accomplishing something that they have yet to do in almost 9 months.
 

kolanuraven

Well-known member
jigs said:
kolanuraven said:
aplusmnt said:
So fair ridden no room for balless idiots!



Then why is Bush still there?
bushes balls are bigger than the ones Hillery took away from Bill.


I'm almost afraid to ask......How do you know about Dubya's balls??? :shock: :shock: :shock:

Wrong jigs...what testicular tissue Bush might have tried to use in his term....well those balls belonged to ' Dick' Cheney!!!
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
aplusmnt said:
The man should be gone, he is an idiot. He did not break the law, he was not unethical in what he did. But he made the stupid mistake of pussyfooting around with the Dems. He should have just said, the prosecutors were not pursuing things in the direction the president wanted and he removed them as was his within his authority. End of story and all Dems can bight the big one. but instead he pussyfooted around the issues and played right into the Dems hands.

So fair ridden no room for balless idiots!

And now we will have months of the Dem's making a big deal about his replacement. Just gives them some more soap box yelling and chest thumping to do instead of accomplishing something that they have yet to do in almost 9 months.

I agree A+-- it was a political move- that he didn't have the backbone to call a political move...And in making the fired individuals look bad, caused all the stink...He should have just said he removed them because they did not fit his ideals or direction--and not made up incompetency and bad work ethics stories....Clinton did it right when he cleaned house completely and said they serve "at the will of the President and AG"....

Thats been the whole story of the Bush Administration tho-- lot of the things he did were right, but in doing them he fouled them up worse and made a bigger joke out of them than any comedy writer in Hollywood could ever dream....

During the election campaign, GW promised to "restore honor and dignity to the White House," and run an open and transparent administration--a reference to the scandals and impeachment of his predecessor-- and he said he would be a President of "compromise instead of confrontation"....
That was the main things that made me vote for him....

Then he surrounded himself with Texas and Corporate neocon cronies--slammed the door to the real outside world and told the rest of the nation to go take a flying ---- at the moon..... :( :( :mad: :mad:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
First it was Michael Chertoff, but now on the Washington Blogs it's rumored that Joe Lieberman will be tapped to be Bush's next Attorney General.

I agree that a Lieberman nomination would be a brilliant Bush move, since it would basically halt the AG investigations, Lieberman would be easily confirmable, and it would put the GOP in charge of the Senate.

But somehow I just don't see Lieberman becoming a Bush Boy......I think he's got the perfect spot right now...An Independent, that both sides have to listen/play to.....
 
Top