• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Good Idea

Help Support Ranchers.net:

A

Anonymous

Guest
Three simple ways to make Congress work

By John Avlon, CNN Contributor
updated 10:22 AM EDT, Thu March 15, 2012

New York (CNN) -- It's not your imagination: Our dysfunctional divided Congress is the least productive and least popular in recent history.

Some congressmen walk the halls like members of rival gangs. The simple job of reasoning together seems out of reach. A few good men and women -- like Sens. Joe Lieberman and Olympia Snowe -- have decided to retire rather than subject themselves to this disheartening Kabuki theater. The system is broken. But what can we do to fix it?


The good news is that it doesn't have to be this way. In the past, divided government presided over ambitious accomplishments like the Marshall Plan and the creation of the interstate highway system.

Ronald Reagan's accomplishments occurred while liberal Tip O'Neill ran the House of Representatives. President Bill Clinton and then-Speaker Newt Gingrich didn't get along at all personally, but together they achieved welfare reform and balanced the budget.



New bill proposes penalty for gridlock

A 'no budget, no pay' Congress? We need to change the culture of Washington to encourage more constructive and more civil behavior -- and that means changing the way the game is played. Congressional reform might not sound all that sexy on the surface, but if you are frustrated with Washington's chronic dysfunction, you should care enough to help propose new solutions.

That's why it was heartening to see a Senate hearing by the Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee this week devoted to congressional reform. It had the overly officious name "Raising the Bar for Congress: Reform Proposals for the 21st century."

But beneath the congressional-ese were some strikingly common sense ideas, some of which were first proposed by the organization No Labels, which I helped co-found in 2010. It is a group of Democrats, Republicans and independents united in the belief that hyper-partisanship is hurting our country because it is stopping us from solving the serious problems we face. Here are three of the ideas proposed that could help heal the hyper-partisan gridlock afflicting Washington.

1) No Budget, No Pay -- This proposal would provide some personal incentive for senators and representatives do to something basic: Pass a budget on time. But the sad fact is that it has been more than 1,000 days since Congress passed a joint budget resolution, which is why we keep playing chicken with a government shutdown over continuing resolutions. What's worse is that this failure has become standard operating procedure. Congress has passed a budget on time only four times since 1952 and, for the past decade and a half, annual budgets have been an average of four months late. Some members of Congress complain that having their $174,000-a-year salary docked until they pass a budget would unfairly penalize them. But we need to apply some reasonable pressure to focus Congress' collective mind. No Budget, No Pay is a good place to start.

2) Filibuster Reform -- Think back to the classic movie "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington" and you'll remember the filibuster scene, the high drama of watching Jimmy Stewart stand alone on the Senate floor trying to alert the nation to a miscarriage of justice. But the filibuster has turned in recent years from an extraordinary event to a routine parliamentary maneuver, designed to block legislation from ever receiving an up or down vote without a supermajority in favor.


Here's a reality check. In the first 50 years of the convening of Congress, the filibuster was used 35 times. In the last two years, it has been used more than 100 times. The system is broken and being abused. "Back in the 1960s, senators had to risk their bladder to filibuster," Rep. Jim Cooper, D-Tennessee, once told me. "Now no senator has skin in the game. They just ask a staffer to file paperwork." A simple procedural rule change to return the filibuster to its roots would mean an end to gridlock.

3) Up or Down Vote in 90 Days -- Since the Clinton era, we've seen an increase in White House nominations getting blocked before they ever get a chance to have an up or down vote. In 2010, Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Alabama, single-handedly blocked 70 nominations to get more spending for his state.

In 2011, more than 200 presidential appointments were left open, including the directorship of FEMA and key positions at the Fed and Treasury as well as federal judgeships. Both parties do it. The Democrats disgracefully blocked President Bush's judicial nominees, including Miguel Estrada. Failing to confirm federal appointments leaves important offices unfilled and good people who want to serve their country stranded on the sidelines. The solution is a rule change that would give the Senate 90 days to advise and consent -- but if they can't get their act together, the nominee would be automatically approved so government work can go on.

These are just a few congressional proposals that have been put forward. You should start proposing a few of your own. After all, no party, person or organization has a monopoly on good ideas. The key is to focus your frustration with Congress in a constructive direction.

With their approval numbers at a historic low, who knows?

They just might feel enough pressure to start taking citizens' advice. As Sen. Joe Lieberman said at the hearing: "We can't just hope and pray for a miraculous political awakening. There's not going to be some spontaneous cultural change in Congress. It's got to be forced."


#4) Term Limits- 2 terms for Senators- 5 for Representatives-- which means if did their job well and was supported by the public and went from one to the other they could still serve 22 years in public service in D.C.

#5) Stricter regulations/transparency on Lobbyiest donations- and definitions of who is a lobbyiest... Too many are now getting around lobbyiest laws by calling themselves "consultants"....
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Mike said:
Too many are now getting around lobbyiest laws by calling themselves "consultants"....

Or Czars. Or Adminstration Dept. heads.............................. Like now.

3) Up or Down Vote in 90 Days -- Since the Clinton era, we've seen an increase in White House nominations getting blocked before they ever get a chance to have an up or down vote. In 2010, Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Alabama, single-handedly blocked 70 nominations to get more spending for his state.

In 2011, more than 200 presidential appointments were left open, including the directorship of FEMA and key positions at the Fed and Treasury as well as federal judgeships. Both parties do it. The Democrats disgracefully blocked President Bush's judicial nominees, including Miguel Estrada. Failing to confirm federal appointments leaves important offices unfilled and good people who want to serve their country stranded on the sidelines. The solution is a rule change that would give the Senate 90 days to advise and consent -- but if they can't get their act together, the nominee would be automatically approved so government work can go on.

Yep- like the author said- since Clinton- and especially with the partisanly divided dysfunctional Congress's of Bush and Obama it has gotten totally out of hand....
That is the reason they need an up or down vote within 90 days... Make the Senate do their Constitutional duty that they have refused to do...
 

Steve

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
16,547
Reaction score
0
Location
Wildwood New Jersey
#5) Stricter regulations/transparency on Lobbyiest donations- and definitions of who is a lobbyiest... Too many are now getting around lobbyiest laws by calling themselves "consultants"....

the simple answer to lobbyist is to stop letting corporations, PACs and other groups from deducting the money spent from their taxes...



while most think it is not tax deductible they left a loophole you could drive a train through..

http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-tege/eotopicb95.pdf
page three
 

Lonecowboy

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2006
Messages
1,990
Reaction score
0
Location
eastern Montana
why not #1- federal government cannot spend money without a budget and must stick to the budget that is passed. no budget no money.
starting with secret service but excluding sos. sec. and military!
 

Cowpuncher

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
652
Reaction score
0
Location
Southeastern Colorado
I guess I am not so upset with congress. When Pelosi and crew were in control, they did anything that Obama wanted. The result was the 2010 election and that foolishness was short-circuited.

Wouldn't it have been nice to have had this congress when Obamacare was passed. Even Obama admits that the costs were hugely underestimated and that it is going to cost twice what they said.

Only hope now is the SCOTUS.

CP
 

Lonecowboy

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2006
Messages
1,990
Reaction score
0
Location
eastern Montana
Cowpuncher said:
I guess I am not so upset with congress. When Pelosi and crew were in control, they did anything that Obama wanted. The result was the 2010 election and that foolishness was short-circuited.

Wouldn't it have been nice to have had this congress when Obamacare was passed. Even Obama admits that the costs were hugely underestimated and that it is going to cost twice what they said.

Only hope now is the SCOTUS.

CP

the states can/will nullify obamacare if the SCOTUS fails us.
 

Latest posts

Top