• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

GOP must repudiate Limbaugh or be defined by him

backhoeboogie

Well-known member
You tell us who our leaders are.

You even refer to me as a leader. Is that still the case?

Still it is no problem for me to disregard Limbaugh. He doesn't cast my votes. I don't listen to him other than him happening to be on talk radio a few times whil I was off of work. So I have heard him twice? in my life time and it was not a complete listening to the whole program.


You have likely heard Limbaugh more than most of us in the GOP. Probably not much different than your following of Palin. You and Frankie seem to quote her or post links to her issue more than anyone else.

Limbaugh is not my guy, not my representative, does not influence me in any way. The only thing I can figure is that he probably told something close to the truth about Obama and any time any one does that, all the libs start shedding tears.

Why are we even talking about Limbaugh again? Is he seeking political office? With his past, I don't think he has a chance of getting elected. But then again, you never know. Look who got elected as President.
 

backhoeboogie

Well-known member
By the way I knew "Menachem Z. Rosensaft" rang a bell. That is the guy from New York who hates guns and hates Texans.

It is a shame I even started reading this whole thread. What a complete waste of time and effort. Who would believe Limbaugh was the person who dictated GOP platform in the first place? Liberals? If that's the case, what difference does it make?
 

Larrry

Well-known member
When the Dem leadership has the biggest rascist there is you would think they would have the brains to keep their mouth shut.
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
I would think the Democrats would be more worried about the repudiation of guys like Peter Singer or Zeke Emanuel, or they will be defined by them.

maybe it's already too late?
 

alice

Well-known member
hypocritexposer said:
I would think the Democrats would be more worried about the repudiation of guys like Peter Singer or Zeke Emanuel, or they will be defined by them.

maybe it's already too late?

You did not answer the question, hypocrite. Instead you diverted.

The question was if anyone could see this man's point?

Alice
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
alice said:
hypocritexposer said:
I would think the Democrats would be more worried about the repudiation of guys like Peter Singer or Zeke Emanuel, or they will be defined by them.

maybe it's already too late?

You did not answer the question, hypocrite. Instead you diverted.

The question was if anyone could see this man's point?

Alice

His point/purpose is to divert from the message and "demonize/marginialize" a messenger.

It's not working.
 

Mike

Well-known member
40-50% (those who vote Republican) of the people in the USA are going to be defined by one person alone?

Sounds like garbage to me. :wink:
 

alice

Well-known member
hypocritexposer said:
alice said:
hypocritexposer said:
I would think the Democrats would be more worried about the repudiation of guys like Peter Singer or Zeke Emanuel, or they will be defined by them.

maybe it's already too late?

You did not answer the question, hypocrite. Instead you diverted.

The question was if anyone could see this man's point?

Alice

His point/purpose is to divert from the message and "demonize/marginialize" a messenger.

It's not working.

Is that a yes or a no?

Alice
 

backhoeboogie

Well-known member
Let's try another approach. :D :D

The democrats must repudiate Rev Wright or be defined by him.

Does that help anyone attain a better understanding? Limbaugh is preaching to a crowd each week just like Wright is.
 

backhoeboogie

Well-known member
reader (the Second) said:
During the 2008 presidential campaign, Barack Obama unambiguously rejected and repudiated Louis Farrakhan, calling the Nation of Islam leader’s anti-Israel and anti-Jewish tirades “unacceptable and reprehensible.” Despite a very real concern that distancing himself from the Rev. Jeremiah Wright risked alienating a significant part of the Democratic base, Obama also condemned as “ridiculous” and “divisive” what he described as his former pastor’s “rants that aren't grounded in truth.

From the article I posted. He in fact did compare the situations.

So if he felt that way, why did he attend Wright's church?
 

badaxemoo

Well-known member
reader (the Second) said:
I don't know, maybe you can research that. It's enough for me that he repudiated Wright's extreme remarks.

I don't know about you, but I dated a man from abroad who made racist comments. He was from a country that is totally homogeneous racially and was brought up in the deep country. He is a good man and would help any person in need out, regardless of race, color, or ethnicity. I still consider this many my friend. For various reasons we are not dating, one being the various ways our different life experiences shaped us so differently.

I look at black men / women of a certain generation and I see chips on the shoulder and among the stronger and more vocal, outspoken and unpleasant attitudes. I don't condone it and I don't feel comfortable around it, but I do know that it belongs to a set of life experiences, just as some of our esteemed Southern members were shaped by their life experiences.


Not to be picky, but if you are referring to the same esteemed members I am thinking of, a better choice of words might be warped!
 
Top