When over 50% of the entire state of Utah is "owned" by the federal government, many of us would not ranch without using publuc land. We take better care of it than a lot of folks do with their private. We have book learned experts telling us how to run cows on ranges we have been stewards over for multiple generations. We deal with hunting, off-roading, tree-huggers and every other type of people while trying to turn a profit in an area that averages 12 inches of water in a year. Yeah, it's defitanely a little cheaper than leasing private. But with all the redtape and headaches that come with it, it sure ain't the cakewalk some of ya'll make it out to be. I will take a smaller federal government EVERY time. How about they give Utah it's land and make national parks in Long Island? How about the federal government quits litagating ranching families and allows them to take care of the land way better than some college degree kid with a liberal agenda and a job with the BLM? Every taxpayer in America has loopholes like deducting mortgages. We give subsides to corn growers, tax breaks to industrial plants, movie studios, office buildings, we grant zoning desisions based on what a company offers a town or city in job creation. Why shouldn't a rancher in a state overwhelmed by federal land get a small break on lease costs? Until nobody gets a tax break, EVER, i will pay my fare share and not one dime more! If you wanta ranch out west where grazing is "FREE" come on out and show us how it is done. Or maybe not, just make the best of what you know and where you dwell. We got more than enough "experts" steering us to extinction already.