Sandhusker said:Has anybody noticed that none of our gun-control whack jobs has explained what problem this gun ban will fix?
Mike said:What bothers me about the Moonbats and Gun Control is that there are laws in all 50 states that make it illegal "to shoot" or "threaten to shoot" someone with a gun................no matter what kind of gun it is...................
CattleArmy said:Mike said:What bothers me about the Moonbats and Gun Control is that there are laws in all 50 states that make it illegal "to shoot" or "threaten to shoot" someone with a gun................no matter what kind of gun it is...................
Somebody forgot to take their meds today. :shock:![]()
CattleArmy said:Go on and on about protecting your home, your family and such, but then step back and realize the rifle you shoot deer with can be just as much of a threat to an intruder as the semi automatic and handguns.
CattleArmy said:Sandhusker said:Has anybody noticed that none of our gun-control whack jobs has explained what problem this gun ban will fix?
I support guns for hunting. It's a sport and I realize the fact that many enjoy it. I have guns locked up safe in my home that are used for this purpose. I don't think there is a need for many of the handguns and other assault weapons outside of the police. Go on and on about protecting your home, your family and such, but then step back and realize the rifle you shoot deer with can be just as much of a threat to an intruder as the semi automatic and handguns.
P.S. I'm still against concealed weapons too.
Sandhusker said:CattleArmy said:Mike said:What bothers me about the Moonbats and Gun Control is that there are laws in all 50 states that make it illegal "to shoot" or "threaten to shoot" someone with a gun................no matter what kind of gun it is...................
Somebody forgot to take their meds today. :shock:![]()
Is he wrong?
Sandhusker said:CattleArmy said:Sandhusker said:Has anybody noticed that none of our gun-control whack jobs has explained what problem this gun ban will fix?
I support guns for hunting. It's a sport and I realize the fact that many enjoy it. I have guns locked up safe in my home that are used for this purpose. I don't think there is a need for many of the handguns and other assault weapons outside of the police. Go on and on about protecting your home, your family and such, but then step back and realize the rifle you shoot deer with can be just as much of a threat to an intruder as the semi automatic and handguns.
P.S. I'm still against concealed weapons too.
You don't understand the Second Amendment.
Larrry said:If someone doesn't want a gun because they are scared of them then they have that right to not own one. I however have the RIGHT to have them. Do not impose your fears of guns on me.
aplusmnt said:CattleArmy said:Go on and on about protecting your home, your family and such, but then step back and realize the rifle you shoot deer with can be just as much of a threat to an intruder as the semi automatic and handguns.
So you want people toting around a Remington 700 7mm Mag when an intruder enters their home? You want a missed shot to go through their walls through the outside wall of the neighbor home and then kill the neighbors little baby as he sleeps in his crib? All because he had to use his Deer rifle to protect his home? :roll:
Or would you prefer the home owner misses with 1st shot and in the time it took to use the bolt action, the intruder hits him over head then as the home owner is unconscious the crook enters the room of his 12 year old daughter and proceeds to rape and sodomize her? :shock:
All this because you have no sense of balance on gun ownership and you wish to infringe on my American rights?![]()
You better stick to TV, the real world is a little more complex! :wink:
CattleArmy said:Sandhusker said:CattleArmy said:I support guns for hunting. It's a sport and I realize the fact that many enjoy it. I have guns locked up safe in my home that are used for this purpose. I don't think there is a need for many of the handguns and other assault weapons outside of the police. Go on and on about protecting your home, your family and such, but then step back and realize the rifle you shoot deer with can be just as much of a threat to an intruder as the semi automatic and handguns.
P.S. I'm still against concealed weapons too.
You don't understand the Second Amendment.
I'm not talking about the Second Amendment I'm stating my opinion on what guns are ok in my opinion and which ones I wouldn't mind seeing banned. Strictly my opinion.
Sandhusker said:CattleArmy said:Sandhusker said:You don't understand the Second Amendment.
I'm not talking about the Second Amendment I'm stating my opinion on what guns are ok in my opinion and which ones I wouldn't mind seeing banned. Strictly my opinion.
What problems are you going to solve by banning those guns?
CattleArmy said:aplusmnt said:CattleArmy said:Go on and on about protecting your home, your family and such, but then step back and realize the rifle you shoot deer with can be just as much of a threat to an intruder as the semi automatic and handguns.
So you want people toting around a Remington 700 7mm Mag when an intruder enters their home? You want a missed shot to go through their walls through the outside wall of the neighbor home and then kill the neighbors little baby as he sleeps in his crib? All because he had to use his Deer rifle to protect his home? :roll:
Or would you prefer the home owner misses with 1st shot and in the time it took to use the bolt action, the intruder hits him over head then as the home owner is unconscious the crook enters the room of his 12 year old daughter and proceeds to rape and sodomize her? :shock:
All this because you have no sense of balance on gun ownership and you wish to infringe on my American rights?![]()
You better stick to TV, the real world is a little more complex! :wink:
Some of you seriously need to move out of the hood.
Aplus here's the thing some people who go on and on and on about needing guns to protect their families in reality need to move to a safer area. I would not want my family to live in an area I felt it was necessary for a gun to protect us. I think it's easier and more responsible to move out of the hood then to cry, whine, and bitch about needing more guns to stay safe. Aplus maybe you should watch more television and realize there's a great big world outside of Kansas.
Pro-gun Democrats oppose new assault weapon ban
By JIM ABRAMS - Associated Press Writer
Sixty-five House Democrats said Wednesday that they would oppose any attempt by the Obama administration to revive a ban on military-style weapons that President Bill Clinton signed into law in 1994 and President George W. Bush let expire.
The pro-gun Democrats, led by Rep. Mike Ross, D-Ark., wrote Attorney General Eric Holder that they would "actively oppose any effort to reinstate the 1994 ban, or to pass any similar law."
They urged the administration to avoid a "long and divisive fight over a gun control issue" at a time when Washington needs to concentrate on the economic crisis.
The House letter came a day after Montana's two Democratic senators, Max Baucus and Jon Tester, wrote a similar letter to Holder saying the Justice Department should enforce existing laws before considering new gun ownership restrictions. "We will strongly oppose any legislation that will infringe upon the rights of individual gun owners," they said.
The letters came after Holder, during a news conference to announce the arrest of Mexican drug dealers, said the drug cartels were obtaining high-powered weapons like the AK-47 from U.S. gun stores and said the Obama administration supported reinstituting the ban on the sale of assault-style weapons.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., has said she plans to introduce legislation to bring back the weapons ban. Feinstein was an author of the 1994 bill, which banned 19 types of semiautomatic, military-style guns. The law expired under the Bush administration in 2004. Another long-term goal is requiring that all gun shows conduct background checks before selling firearms.
The National Rifle Association has said it is mobilizing to stop any assault weapons ban, and the opposition of 65 House Democrats, many from rural or conservative districts with strong pro-gun sentiments, probably would doom any legislative drive to restrict gun ownership.
Already this year, Republicans have stalled legislation that would give the District of Columbia a voting representative in the House by linking the bill to a measure significantly weakening D.C.'s gun laws.
House Democratic leaders have put off a vote on the voting rights bill out of concern that pro-gun Democrats would oppose it if it is separated from the gun measure.
I'm not talking about the Second Amendment I'm stating my opinion on what guns are ok in my opinion and which ones I wouldn't mind seeing banned. Strictly my opinion
Honestly I'm not trying to solve any problems just in my opinion the common person doesn't need to own them.
CattleArmy said:aplusmnt said:CattleArmy said:Go on and on about protecting your home, your family and such, but then step back and realize the rifle you shoot deer with can be just as much of a threat to an intruder as the semi automatic and handguns.
So you want people toting around a Remington 700 7mm Mag when an intruder enters their home? You want a missed shot to go through their walls through the outside wall of the neighbor home and then kill the neighbors little baby as he sleeps in his crib? All because he had to use his Deer rifle to protect his home? :roll:
Or would you prefer the home owner misses with 1st shot and in the time it took to use the bolt action, the intruder hits him over head then as the home owner is unconscious the crook enters the room of his 12 year old daughter and proceeds to rape and sodomize her? :shock:
All this because you have no sense of balance on gun ownership and you wish to infringe on my American rights?![]()
You better stick to TV, the real world is a little more complex! :wink:
Some of you seriously need to move out of the hood.
Aplus here's the thing some people who go on and on and on about needing guns to protect their families in reality need to move to a safer area. I would not want my family to live in an area I felt it was necessary for a gun to protect us. I think it's easier and more responsible to move out of the hood then to cry, whine, and bitch about needing more guns to stay safe. Aplus maybe you should watch more television and realize there's a great big world outside of Kansas.