hypocritexposer
Well-known member
Not very often that the courts rule on something before it comes to a vote. Most times the funding has already been approved before the court rules.
Any Rep. or Sen. that votes for funding for an "act" that has already been deemed unconstitutional should be impeached, immediately, no questions asked. If it is appealed and overturned, then you can vote.
Seems fairly simple to me...
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/feb/25/obama-says-he-wont-be-deterred-by-one-federal-judg/
"We the People" already expressed their opinion back in November.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/feb/25/obama-says-he-wont-be-deterred-by-one-federal-judg/
Any Rep. or Sen. that votes for funding for an "act" that has already been deemed unconstitutional should be impeached, immediately, no questions asked. If it is appealed and overturned, then you can vote.
Seems fairly simple to me...
A confident President Obama said Wednesday he won’t be stopped by “one federal judge,” telling a Miami crowd he’ll move ahead with his controversial executive action on immigration and vowing his administration will become even more aggressive in the weeks and months to come.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/feb/25/obama-says-he-wont-be-deterred-by-one-federal-judg/
"We the People" already expressed their opinion back in November.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/feb/25/obama-says-he-wont-be-deterred-by-one-federal-judg/