• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Hillary's China Connection

Mike

Well-known member
by Paul R. Hollrah
Hillary's China Connection
October 22, 2007 01:59 PM EST



The Los Angeles Times disclosed in an October 19 investigative report that Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign has been the beneficiary of hundreds of thousands of dollars in suspicious contributions from donors in New York’s Chinatown. According to the Times, “Dishwashers, waiters, and others whose jobs and dilapidated home addresses seem to make them unpromising targets for political fundraisers are pouring $1,000 and $2,000 contributions into Clinton’s campaign treasury. BREAK

In April, a single fundraiser in an area long noted for its gritty urban poverty yielded a whopping $380,000…” BREAK

The Times examined the cases of more than 150 donors who wrote checks to Clinton after fundraising events geared to the Chinese community. One-third of those donors could not be found… And several dozen were described in FEC reports as holding jobs… that would normally make it difficult to donate amounts ranging from $500 to the legal maximum of $2,300.” BREAK

A tenement at 44 Henry Street was listed in Clinton’s FEC filings as the home of Shu Fang Li, a $1,000 contributor. A woman living in the apartment said that she had never heard of Shu, although she has lived there for ten years. BREAK

A building in East Broadway, beneath the Manhattan Bridge, was listed as the address of $1,000 contributor Sang Cheung Lee. Neighbors said they knew of no one by that name at that address. BREAK

Clerks at a store on Canal Street, listed as the place of employment of $1,000 contributor Shih Kan Chang, were equally mystified. Employees said they had never heard of Chang. BREAK

Another listed donor, Yi Min Liu, admitted to having attended a banquet for Clinton but denied having made the $1,000 contribution that was reported in his name. BREAK

Of course, none of this is new to the Clintons. They may be convinced that those of us who have followed their criminal careers for the past two decades have either forgotten their past sins or disposed of our voluminous files. They would be badly mistaken. BREAK

A short stroll down memory lane reminds us that, in 1993, under Hillary Clinton’s sponsorship, John Huang, president of an Arkansas subsidiary of Indonesia’s Lippo Group, left Arkansas to accept a senior policy position in the U.S. Department of Commerce. On June 30, 1994, after obtaining top security clearances and receiving all of the necessary intelligence briefings, Huang was named Deputy Assistant Secretary of Commerce for International Trade Policy. BREAK

Then, in a September 13, 1995 Oval Office meeting, which included the president, Huang, and Huang’s former employer, Indonesian billionaire James Riady, it was decided that Huang would leave the Commerce Department to become a fulltime fundraiser for the Democratic National Committee. BREAK

During his tenure at the DNC, Huang had little difficulty raising money. For example, on August 1, 1996, Hillary’s protégé sold $122,000 worth of tickets for a single event, Bill Clinton’s 50th birthday party, to yet another Clinton friend, Charlie Yah Lin Trie, a man with a lot of Chinese cash to spend. It was a hard sell… about as tough as selling a poker chip to a gambler. BREAK

The source of Trie’s money? In its June 7, 1998 edition, the Washington Times reported that House investigators had pieced together an elaborate network showing how Trie and his associates funneled Chinese money into Democratic Party coffers. According to House investigators, the money trail led from mainland China to Macao businessman Ng Lap Seng, from Ng to Charlie Trie, from Trie to a nationwide network of “straw” donors, and from the “straw” donors to the Democrats. BREAK

In just one major transaction, Trie donated more than $600,000 to the Clinton Legal Defense Fund. Much of the money was contributed… get this… via consecutively-numbered money orders, mailed from cities across the country, with different contributor names affixed… but all signed by the same person and each containing the same misspelled word. (Don’t you just hate it when that happens?) BREAK

Clearly, the Clinton’s have mastered the technique of “reverse bundling,” where a single contributor, say the Chinese Peoples Liberation Army, wishes to enhance the political prospects of a favored American candidate. During the Bill Clinton era, one of their principal conduits was Charlie Yah Lin Trie. Now, in the Hillary Clinton era, we have imprisoned Chinese businessman Norman Hsu. Doubtless there are others. BREAK

As might be expected, the New York Times appeared only slightly interested in the story. In an October 19 editorial they wrote, “Corruption already is licking at various candidates’ treasuries as unscrupulous bundlers turn out to be faking claims of small donations, writing big-number checks to buy access.” BREAK

Have they forgotten how to spell “Clinton” and “Edwards?” BREAK

Democrat stalwart Chris Matthews, host of MSNBC’s Hardball, is no fan of the Clinton’s. In a March 11, 2001 op-ed column describing the Clintons, he wrote, “Before this, we laughed at poor little countries that drug dealers and international crooks could buy. We mocked the Third World capitals where a little money on the fingers of a certain family member could open doors or close eyes. BREAK

“Thanks to Bill and Hillary Clinton, we have now forfeited that small national vanity. The next movie about international drug-dealing… may well feature not a Mexican police chief but an American president as the bag man.”
 

Cal

Well-known member
“Thanks to Bill and Hillary Clinton, we have now forfeited that small national vanity. The next movie about international drug-dealing… may well feature not a Mexican police chief but an American president as the bag man.”
Or bag lady.
 

Goodpasture

Well-known member
kolanuraven said:
Pitiful.....as this was LAST WEEKS news!


It was corrected and it's O-V-E-R!!!!

Yeah, but with no current gossip, they have to have something to say today......and it isn't like they have anything good about their own candidates to talk about. Ever notice how often they extol the virtues of the GOP candidates? Like never?????? They prefer bashing Hillary to trying to find something good about Rudy or Mitt.......
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
kolanuraven said:
Pitiful.....as this was LAST WEEKS news!


It was corrected and it's O-V-E-R!!!!

I seem to remember Bill having a little issue with the Chinese. If you think this was an isolatet incident with Hillary.....
 

kolanuraven

Well-known member
Sandhusker said:
kolanuraven said:
Pitiful.....as this was LAST WEEKS news!


It was corrected and it's O-V-E-R!!!!

I seem to remember Bill having a little issue with the Chinese. If you think this was an isolatet incident with Hillary.....

See there ya go....trying to bring in the past . Let me break it you.... sit down....this might be true news to you.


BILL CLINTON IS NOT.....IS NOT.....THE PRESIDENT. He hasn't been in a long....l-o-o-o-o-n-g time.


GET OVER IT!!!


With that kinda of reasoning you people use...the mess we're in now is the fault to George B. Sr. , he didn't have ' safe sex' and now we have Dubya!!

But wait....that may be right..some one shoud slap the crap outta the old man for being so cheap by NOT buying a condom!!
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
kolanuraven said:
Sandhusker said:
kolanuraven said:
Pitiful.....as this was LAST WEEKS news!


It was corrected and it's O-V-E-R!!!!

I seem to remember Bill having a little issue with the Chinese. If you think this was an isolatet incident with Hillary.....

See there ya go....trying to bring in the past . Let me break it you.... sit down....this might be true news to you.


BILL CLINTON IS NOT.....IS NOT.....THE PRESIDENT. He hasn't been in a long....l-o-o-o-o-n-g time.


GET OVER IT!!!


With that kinda of reasoning you people use...the mess we're in now is the fault to George B. Sr. , he didn't have ' safe sex' and now we have Dubya!!

But wait....that may be right..some one shoud slap the crap outta the old man for being so cheap by NOT buying a condom!!

You think Hillary was not front and center in everything Bill did (well almost everything.....)? She knew exactly what was going on, was in the middle of it, and you see the same patterns today. Both are immoral, power hungry crooks.
 

kolanuraven

Well-known member
Sandhusker said:
kolanuraven said:
Sandhusker said:
I seem to remember Bill having a little issue with the Chinese. If you think this was an isolatet incident with Hillary.....

See there ya go....trying to bring in the past . Let me break it you.... sit down....this might be true news to you.


BILL CLINTON IS NOT.....IS NOT.....THE PRESIDENT. He hasn't been in a long....l-o-o-o-o-n-g time.


GET OVER IT!!!


With that kinda of reasoning you people use...the mess we're in now is the fault to George B. Sr. , he didn't have ' safe sex' and now we have Dubya!!

But wait....that may be right..some one shoud slap the crap outta the old man for being so cheap by NOT buying a condom!!

You think Hillary was not front and center in everything Bill did (well almost everything.....)? She knew exactly what was going on, was in the middle of it, and you see the same patterns today. Both are immoral, power hungry crooks.


I'd vote for him again if Icould...and I'm gonna vote for her. Maybe not 100% just ' for ' her...but we'll get Bill in the package...and that's enough for me!! :clap:


Answer me this....if you see the Clinton's as immoral & power hungry.....what do you see as the adjective for Bush?
 

kolanuraven

Well-known member
Sandhusker said:
Thick headed, arrogant, imperial, incompetent.

One doesn't excuse the other.

DUNCAN HUNTER IN 08

I didn't say one excused the other. I was just curious as to your answer.

Interesting you use the world ' imperial'....as I don't think many of his followers see that angle.
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
kolanuraven said:
Sandhusker said:
Thick headed, arrogant, imperial, incompetent.

One doesn't excuse the other.

DUNCAN HUNTER IN 08

I didn't say one excused the other. I was just curious as to your answer.

Interesting you use the world ' imperial'....as I don't many of his followers see that angle.

I'm not one of his followers. I don't have much use for him.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Hey, 'raven, I hear Hillary is going to name Bill to the Supreme Court if an opening comes up when she's president. :lol:
 

kolanuraven

Well-known member
ff said:
Hey, 'raven, I hear Hillary is going to name Bill to the Supreme Court if an opening comes up when she's president. :lol:




We'd never be THAT lucky!!! :lol: :lol:


Besides, he'd be a much better Sec of State instead!
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
kolanuraven said:
ff said:
Hey, 'raven, I hear Hillary is going to name Bill to the Supreme Court if an opening comes up when she's president. :lol:




We'd never be THAT lucky!!! :lol: :lol:


Besides, he'd be a much better Sec of State instead!

Oh, I don't know. He'd have such a long lasting effect on the country as a Supreme Court judge. He's not all that old. He could be influencial for another 30 years. :lol:
 

kolanuraven

Well-known member
ff said:
kolanuraven said:
ff said:
Hey, 'raven, I hear Hillary is going to name Bill to the Supreme Court if an opening comes up when she's president. :lol:




We'd never be THAT lucky!!! :lol: :lol:


Besides, he'd be a much better Sec of State instead!

Oh, I don't know. He'd have such a long lasting effect on the country as a Supreme Court judge. He's not all that old. He could be influencial for another 30 years. :lol:


Very true. I was just thinking of a quick fix to our world approval....but you are right!
 
Top