• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Hillary's Indictments - To Go Public?

Traveler

Well-known member
http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2016/03/ed-klein-fbi-may-seek-immunity-for-huma.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

My sources tell me that the Justice Department is close to empaneling a grand jury and deciding whether to grant statutory immunity to Huma Abedin, Hillary's closest adviser.

That would force Huma to testify under oath and face perjury charges and jail time if she lies. I'm also told that Hillary herself will most likely be forced to testify.

Klein indicates that FBI director James Comey is inching ever closer to a recommendation to indict Hillary Clinton, a political hot potato handed to Attorney General Loretta Lynch the likes of which the political system hasn't seen since Nixon.

My sources say the likelihood is that Lynch will not make that decision herself. Instead, she'll probably appoint a special counsel to make the decision. That will get the Obama administration off the hook and avoid charges of a conflict of interest or, even worse, obstruction of justice.
 

Traveler

Well-known member
Bill Clinton recently mentioned the disaster of the last eight years, and Chelsea mentioned the crushing cost of Obamacare, in speeches, so Hillary may be a little less endeared to the regime than she was. Buckwheat is vindictive, if nothing else.
 

iwannabeacowboy

Well-known member
Hopefully the gloves come off and they pull no punches all the way to the clink- surely Killary has a nuclear option tucked away somewhere for Hussein as well.
 

Traveler

Well-known member
http://www.salon.com/2016/04/05/this_is_how_the_fbi_destroys_hillary_the_10_questions_that_could_end_her_white_house_dreams/
 

Steve

Well-known member
President Obama’s latest defense of Hillary Clinton has struck a nerve with both the GOP and government leakers such as Edward Snowden.

The president’s comments — “there’s classified and then there’s classified” — suggested some classified information is more sensitive than other classified information, uniting in scorn critics across the political spectrum.

To advocates for government transparency, the remarks stunk of duplicity by suggesting that federal classification rules are arbitrary and don't apply to the Democratic presidential front-runner.

“If only I had known,” tweeted Snowden, the former National Security Agency (NSA) contractor who fled the country in 2013 before leaking reams of classified documents about global surveillance. Snowden is now facing multiple federal charges for his leaks.
 

Latest posts

Top