• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Hold your nose and support Kansas Slum University

Brad S

Well-known member
Cats got some 'splainin to do...
Posted: 8/12/06 7:31:11 pm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HUGHES, TYLER JOHN
SEX OFFENDER
Last Known Address as of: 7/25/2006
1126 BLUEMONT APT 1
MANHATTAN, KS 66502
County: RILEY
Race/Sex: W / M
Date of Birth: 9/11/1984
Registered Since: 5/25/2006
Offense: AGGRAVATED INDECENT LIBERTIES W/CHILD
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

https://www.accesskansas.org/ssrv-registered-offender/index.do


http://mb24.scout.com/fkansasinsiderfrm3.showMessage?topicID=73838.topic
 

jigs

Well-known member
Kansas State athletics director Tim Weiser announced Saturday that senior center Tyler Hughes has been indefinitely suspended from the men's basketball team, K-State announced in a prepared statement.

"Until we have fully investigated and know all the facts surrounding the situation. Tyler has been suspended indefinitely from all team activities and we will have no further comment," Weiser said in the statement.


how about waiting to see the facts before jumping to conclusions.......pity the guy who draws you for jury duty Brad
 

Brad S

Well-known member
He's been CONVICTED of aggravated indecent liberties w a child. What possible "fact" would mitigate the fact that HUghes has been a child molester the entire time at KSU.

For me the conviction stands alone

He committed the crime while he was 17. In order to get Ag indecent liberties at 17, he needed to have consentual intercourse with someone less than 14 due to the "romeo & Juliet" laws of "99"

What the hell, Hughes would be a role model for the incoming filth Chuggins is recruiting. Tyree was charged with about the same in another jurisdiction, grades not plea bargain kept him out of the slum.
 

jigs

Well-known member
17 doinking a 14 yr old, well that is a Senior doing a Sophomore. that happens way too frequently in this world

now add in the fact the senior is a big time ball player. the sophomore lets him take a ride, then finds out that the ball player is doinking other girls in school, so what does she do?????

cry rape! or just say how he " tricked" her into it.....

sad, but it happens in many towns, and then the kid gets hammered about it the rest of his life.

I am wondering if you and chicken little are somehow related Brad....

PS the sky is NOT falling
 

Brad S

Well-known member
Clearly literacy is optional at the slum. I posted 17 and less than 14 - as in 13 or 12 or any other number NOT IN HIGH SCHOOL.


First, the lame "shame for not waiting for facts that may justify aggrivated indecent liberties with a child."

THen the dishonest 17 - 15 claim.

I thought Thuggins may not be a good fit in Manhattan due to his recruiting rapists like Robert Whaley - looks like he's right at home and ol jigs is pretty good at making excuses for such conduct.


Jigs, you may not see the sky falling, but the child victim of KSU sexual predator may have some bad days, as might the child victim of KSU recruiting target Tyree Evans, as might the child victim of former thuggins ' player Robert Whaley... need I continue? Yes there's more. Sure these sexual predators are creeps, as are those who would spin their acts as anything but the terrible acts they are.
 

CattleRMe

Well-known member
To me this is such a touche subject. But I tend to have to agree with jigs in the fact that 17 year olds and 14 year old doesn't constitute a sexual offender. With the maturity rate of children rising and girls being more mature then boys for the most part who's to say they aren't about at a level playing field? Would I as a parent be upset if it was my 14 year old daughter? YES! But I think people need to look at each individual situation and realize in some instances the girls are the instigators. If the girl was 12 then yes to me it crosses the line ..........

Years ago there was a case here in Nebraska some even might remember. A local 20 something man got involved with a 14-15 year old girl. Was it wrong? Yes! Was it a crime............see to me that is where the question lies.......some say she persued him some say it was a crime against a child. I honestly don't know what I think look at how some of the 14 year olds act today?
 

jigs

Well-known member
I find it odd how you play judge and jury on a guy where ( I believe) the court records are sealed. so you are basing your hatred on assuptions that it was a 4 year old or something. Brad, I hate child molesters too. and this posture you are taking is beginning to make it appear that you think I condone child molestation. that irritates me.

if you want to trade barbs on teams and rivalries, fine, but you are getting way out of wack....almost Haymaker-ish.

Might I suggest you go take your medication, and return with a bit less hatred and a bit more tact.
 

jigs

Well-known member
for the record brad....

Indecent Liberties With A Child
KSA 21-3503

a) Indecent liberties with a child is engaging in any of the following acts with a child 14 or more years of age but less than 16 years of age:
1) And lewd fondling or touching of the person of either the child or the offender done or submitted to with the intent to arouse or to satisfy the sexual desires of either the child or the offender, or both; or
2) Soliciting the child to engage in any lewd fondling or touching of the person of another with the intent to arouse or satisfy the sexual desires of the child, the offender, or another.

Indecent Liberties with a child is a severity level 5, person felony.




it appears she was between 14 and 16. wrong, none the less. but still I wonder what is the crime and punishment of a girl who leads on a guy and after the deed is done,, decides she didn't REALLY want to do it????

3 sides to every story.
 

Brad S

Well-known member
Nice try at coverup Jigs, but I'm no KState dullard easily tricked. THe statute you cite is only part of the law - THE PART THAT DOESN'T APPLY. If the perp is 19 or less then the "romeo & Juliet statute controls. In this case the perp was 17. the only way for a 17 year old to get the AG indecent liberties is for the victim to be 13 or younger.


You say I hate child molesters and those who rationalize their crimes? Oh Sorry, I was raised to think sexual predators were evil - guess not in the KSU/Thuggins world.

Jiggy boy, YES, YOU ARE RATIONALIZING EVIL. First you say wait for facts eventhough the perp is CONVICTED, then you lie and say the victim was a sophmore, then you lie further and post the noncontrolling law. Jiggy boy, you fit right in with Thuggins and the rest of the scum at KSU.
 

Brad S

Well-known member
If the victim was 14 or 15, the record woundn't show a conviction for aggravated indecent liberties ...due to this statute, in effect since 1999:



21-3522. Unlawful voluntary sexual relations.

(a) Unlawful voluntary sexual relations is engaging in voluntary: (1) Sexual intercourse; (2) sodomy; or (3) lewd fondling or touching with a child who is 14 years of age but less than 16 years of age and the offender is less than 19 years of age and less than four years of age older than the child and the child and the offender are the only parties involved and are members of the opposite sex.


That leaves FORCED SEXUAL FONDLING, or THE VICTIM WAS 13 or younger or less --

the "opposite sex" language was severed from the statute as unconstitutional).


Thuggy is right at home with all the coverup going on - next they'll be saying she was dressed provactively.
 

Brad S

Well-known member
Ok Jiggyboy, refresh my memory, what was that KU = gay smack you were laying on me the other day? Well personally I condemn molesting girls equally with molesting boys and KSU losers coverup, lie, and spin molesting boys equally with molesting girls. Got something here you're gonna have to attack me for. Previously you said I was premature, hasty, hateful, angry, ignorant and I can't remember what else - so your next diversionary attack needs to be something original.



.The Mercury has learned from Johnson Country District Attorney Paul Morrison that there were two victims, both males and under the age of 14, and that Hughes pled guilty to a single charge.[
 

jigs

Well-known member
Brad, give me a break.

you are ripping my ass over something I detest myself, and then you carry on like it was me who signed the kid, me who held the girl down so he could do his deed.

so I am a KSU fan, it does not mean I am 100% behind every move they make. it does not mean I am gonna run out and fondle kids, because I want to be like this guy.

when you get your head out of your ass, I will be happy to RATIONALLY discuss it with you. until then I am dropping this.
 

Brad S

Well-known member
Oh Jigs, good one - now I'm irrational. My first post on this thread didn't mention you at all. I only addressed your spin and rationalizations, and review all the attacks you levied. There is no excuse for child molesting, and once convicted, I don't need more facts.

The only dirty trick I pulled is dribbled out information to allow Wildcat apologists to show their priorities before they knew Hughes was slamdunk dirty. The next perp won't be so totally proven dirty and the KSU spin may work. THe spinners just didn't realize the extent of the proof. Now all the spinners are all against sex predators, but when Hughes was merely convicted, they came up with all sorts of spin.


Jigs,"KU is know for 2 things...basketball, and high % of homosexuals on campus."
 
Top