• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

Holey Moley! A Dem With A Good Idea!!!

Mike

Well-known member
While President Barack Obama goes on the road to shore up slipping popular support for the $1 trillion stimulus porkfest that he ordered up from Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Rep. Walt Minnick, a freshman Democrat from Idaho, is pushing a better idea: The Strategic Targeted American Recovery and Transition Act (START).

Minnick is a member of the Blue Dog caucus of occasionally conservative Democcrats. His START plan is a $170 billion “bare bones” pure stimulus approach that would put $100 billion immediately into the pockets of low- and middle-income Americans, then use the other $70 billion for basic infrastructure projects that create jobs. START requires that all funds not spent by 2010 be returned to the Treasury. START also stops stimulus spending when the nation’s Gross Domestic Product increases in two of three previous quarters, and all START payments are required to be posted on a public website.

Minnick introduced START as an alternative – just in case the legislative process stalls out, says press secretary John Foster. As one of the brave 11 Democrats who voted against Pelosi’s stimulus bill, Minnick explained to folks back home that he opposed the speaker’s version because it was so “Christmas-treed up” with wasteful spending, like $300 million for golf carts. Foster told The Examiner that the House leadership encourages members to do what’s best for their districts, so there has been no backlash. We’ll see how long that lasts.
 

Yanuck

Well-known member
Mike, this was in our local paper last week, we live in one of the few Blue counties in Idaho, so you can imagine there were a few people who don't agree with Minnick, personally I' think he's doing the right thing so far


U.S. Rep. Walt Minnick, a Democrat, is congressman from Idaho's First District. This week he introduced his own $174 billion stimulus bill.

By WALT MINNICK

Our nation is in trouble. Unemployment rates are climbing, people are watching their savings disappear and all of us are worried about what comes next.

That's why Idaho families, workers, businesses and local governments should get what they have asked for from the U.S. Congress: smart investments to create new jobs and put people back to work.

I do not believe that the largest spending bill in U.S. history is the most effective way to do that. That's why I voted against the American Recovery and Investment Act, otherwise known as the stimulus bill.

What began with a tight focus on job creation and infrastructure improvements ballooned into a "something for everything" spending proposal. And it will saddle our nation with economic burdens that could be just as onerous as the one we are wearing now.

Hundreds of billions of dollars in the stimulus bill are for programs that have never before been authorized by Congress. Like you, I think it's a horrible idea to try to appropriate large sums of taxpayer dollars to programs that have never before been debated or authorized.

A Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report on the stimulus bill estimates that only 7 percent of the $358 billion of the discretionary funds in the plan would be spent in this fiscal year. The CBO also estimated that only 38 percent of the bill would be spent by the end of fiscal year 2010 and that a third of the bill would still be unspent in 31 months.

If this bill becomes law, our deficit will grow to nearly $2 trillion, and every penny we borrow will come from foreign leaders who will rapidly gain too much leverage over our economic welfare and decisions. We are in a recession, and we must spend some money to get the economy moving again, but the American people must have guarantees that this stimulus bill will not become an excuse for fiscal irresponsibility.

There is much about the stimulus bill I support. We need to improve health care. Our nation needs a completely new approach to energy. We must improve higher education and increase access for all children.

But those things are not immediate, direct economic stimulus.

To jump-start our economy, Congress needs to fund shovel-ready road projects, and should remove restrictions that force the money to go only to projects meeting federal standards. We should extend unemployment benefits so our workers can hang on until the economy begins to turn the corner as the stimulus funds work into our financial system. We should provide money to states so they can help local school districts carry out planned construction projects and thus save money to help keep teachers in the classroom. And we should offer tax cuts to those who need the money the most, so it will go into our economy quickly, spur spending and increase jobs.

Once the economy is moving again, Congress needs to go back to balancing the budget and start paying for what we spend. Like you, I believe that these tough times could also be the beginning of a new era of fiscal responsibility, but it must start with smart, strategic spending on key projects to put people back to work.

These tough times require quick, direct action, but our obligation to the next generation means spending every nickel in the most cost-effective way.

http://www.mtexpress.com/index2.php?ID=2005124742
 

Mike

Well-known member
Thanks. I could live with this type of Democrat.

Wonder if he'll ever get an appointment on a committee of any importance?
 

badaxemoo

Well-known member
Mike said:
Thanks. I could live with this type of Democrat.

Wonder if he'll ever get an appointment on a committee of any importance?

Well, if the Idaho Republicans can't come up with someone better than Bill Sali to take on Minnick in 2010, you just might have your wish.

Yanuck, in such a Republican state like yours, there has to be someone on the Republican bench that could knock off Sali in a primary, isn't there?
 

Yanuck

Well-known member
badaxemoo said:
Mike said:
Thanks. I could live with this type of Democrat.

Wonder if he'll ever get an appointment on a committee of any importance?

Well, if the Idaho Republicans can't come up with someone better than Bill Sali to take on Minnick in 2010, you just might have your wish.

Yanuck, in such a Republican state like yours, there has to be someone on the Republican bench that could knock off Sali in a primary, isn't there?

To be honest Badaxe, I have no idea, listening to the man this past fall, I knew he wouldn't get my vote. I didn't vote a straight ticket, to me you need to vote whose ideas come closest to yours, whether they're D or R, common sense must prevail. I'm quite happy with Idaho's team in Washington, and when our Gov. stood on the steps of the Capitol in Boise and said he wanted to be one of the first to purchase a wolf tag should they ever be delisted? well lets just say it warmed my heart!! :wink:
 
Top