• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

How to confront the illegal situation head on.

A

Anonymous

Guest
What would be wrong with boycotting bussinesses that fail to certify they are not working illegals? :wink:

Say the democrat party or republican Party The tea party or all three combined ask bussinesses to certify they are working only legals any that are caught are added to a boycott list or any that refuse are boycotted. Including for starters all mexican run bussiness's!
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
The E-verify program allows business's to check out the legal status of employees and potential employees-- but the US Chamber of Commerce is fighting it in court...

They (big industry and those with nannies, poolboys, gardeners, farm laborers, maids, etc. etc) don't want to end their access to cheap semi-slave labor...
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
So let's get this straight OT. You have a problem with Law enforcement checking for immigration status, but not a corporation.

they should be fighting illegal immigration from both ends and the middle.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
hypocritexposer said:
So let's get this straight OT. You have a problem with Law enforcement checking for immigration status, but not a corporation.

they should be fighting illegal immigration from both ends and the middle.

I have a problem with LE doing "papers please" (pictures of Nazi occupation) stops and checks--- but I have no problem with anyone seeking employment being required to provide proof of status....
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Oldtimer said:
The E-verify program allows business's to check out the legal status of employees and potential employees-- but the US Chamber of Commerce is fighting it in court...

They (big industry and those with nannies, poolboys, gardeners, farm laborers, maids, etc. etc) don't want to end their access to cheap semi-slave labor...

ot just how many democrat bussinesses would you ay benifit from this cheap labor. Also for the record how many democrat apointees in the past have had to excuse themselves because of working illegals or not paying workers comp or social security you get my drift don't you.


There was also the issue of boycotts how do you feal about that? Would you support a national boycott of corporations found working illegals be it a mexican resturant or someone like tyson?

Lastly how many times have you paid someone that gave you a price to do something more than what they asked or said they would do the job for? I guess its best asked this way have you ever said things like boy I GOT THIS OR THAT DONE CHEAPER THAN WHAT I WAS WILLING TO PAY. I mean benifited from someones weakness or their need to have a job?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
hypocritexposer said:
What kind of proof would be sufficient for an employer to check citizenship status?

Not sure what E-Verify checks besides SS and green card/legal residency info...

Would you hire someone who refuses to provide proof?

Nope
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
hypocritexposer said:
What kind of proof would be sufficient for an employer to check citizenship status?

Not sure what E-Verify checks besides SS and green card/legal residency info...

Would you hire someone who refuses to provide proof?

Nope

Why wouldn't you want to hire/vote for someone that will not provide proof of citizenship?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
hypocritexposer said:
Oldtimer said:
hypocritexposer said:
What kind of proof would be sufficient for an employer to check citizenship status?

Not sure what E-Verify checks besides SS and green card/legal residency info...

Would you hire someone who refuses to provide proof?

Nope

Why wouldn't you want to hire/vote for someone that will not provide proof of citizenship?

Its illegal to hire someone that doesn't have legal immigrant status...

As far as your voting question- you are no doubt speaking of your rightwingernut Presidential conspiracy...

As far as I can see all the Presidents have- and after having been elected by the majority of the population have been elected by the Electoral College voters (who's job it is to ascertain they meet all Constitutional requirements)- and certified by the US Congress....That has been the procedure for years- and in the case of our current President- Obama- that certification by Congress was unanimous with no legislators objecting....
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
That doesn't answer my question, whatsoever.

Why would you not want to employ/vote for someone who does not provide proof of citizenship?

What are the dangers of doing so?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
hypocritexposer said:
That doesn't answer my question, whatsoever.

Why would you not want to employ/vote for someone who does not provide proof of citizenship?

What are the dangers of doing so?

Its against the LAW!!
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
hypocritexposer said:
That doesn't answer my question, whatsoever.

Why would you not want to employ/vote for someone who does not provide proof of citizenship?

What are the dangers of doing so?

Its against the LAW!!

So are the laws concerning citizenship being followed and enforced at present? (you already said they are not, so I assume you still feel that way)

And if the Feds. or States are not enforcing the laws, what would be the danger of hiring/voting for someone who does not provide proof of citizenship?
 

hopalong

Well-known member
You notice oldtimer never answered my question has he ever broken the LAW???
We already know he has by his own ADMISSION
:wink: :wink: :wink:
 

Liveoak

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
The E-verify program allows business's to check out the legal status of employees and potential employees-- but the US Chamber of Commerce is fighting it in court...

They (big industry and those with nannies, poolboys, gardeners, farm laborers, maids, etc. etc) don't want to end their access to cheap semi-slave labor...

OT, as an employer, I logged on to the E-Verify system, and made an attempt to get through the "online training". After two hours, the dang thing still went on and on and on. It was b.s.. They could have simplified the whole thing by allowing you to just enter in the persons SS# and Drivers License Number and then let them check to see if the name matches. But, no, they have to drag everybodies ass through reams of senseless online training that makes no sense. So, for now, for me, it's "Hable English?" "Your hired." What the government needs is a good thatch removal machine to run over it about 50 times.
 

Steve

Well-known member
PigFarmer said:
What would be wrong with boycotting bussinesses that fail to certify they are not working illegals?

nothing is wrong with the idea of boycotting a business that is conducting "illegal" activity.. .. and it would be a good start..

every tool is useful in the fight against crime..

I would not use the "SOLE" criteria for voting for a person who has hired illegals. but it would be a major factor.. just as many other issues would be..
 
Top