• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

How to Write a Good Letter of Resignation

TexasBred

Well-known member
The following is a letter sent on Tuesday by Jake DeSantis, an executive vice president of the American International Group’s financial products unit, to Edward M. Liddy, the chief executive of A.I.G.

DEAR Mr. Liddy,

It is with deep regret that I submit my notice of resignation from A.I.G. Financial Products. I hope you take the time to read this entire letter. Before describing the details of my decision, I want to offer some context:

I am proud of everything I have done for the commodity and equity divisions of A.I.G.-F.P. I was in no way involved in — or responsible for — the credit default swap transactions that have hamstrung A.I.G. Nor were more than a handful of the 400 current employees of A.I.G.-F.P. Most of those responsible have left the company and have conspicuously escaped the public outrage.

After 12 months of hard work dismantling the company — during which A.I.G. reassured us many times we would be rewarded in March 2009 — we in the financial products unit have been betrayed by A.I.G. and are being unfairly persecuted by elected officials. In response to this, I will now leave the company and donate my entire post-tax retention payment to those suffering from the global economic downturn. My intent is to keep none of the money myself.

I take this action after 11 years of dedicated, honorable service to A.I.G. I can no longer effectively perform my duties in this dysfunctional environment, nor am I being paid to do so. Like you, I was asked to work for an annual salary of $1, and I agreed out of a sense of duty to the company and to the public officials who have come to its aid. Having now been let down by both, I can no longer justify spending 10, 12, 14 hours a day away from my family for the benefit of those who have let me down.

You and I have never met or spoken to each other, so I’d like to tell you about myself. I was raised by schoolteachers working multiple jobs in a world of closing steel mills. My hard work earned me acceptance to M.I.T., and the institute’s generous financial aid enabled me to attend. I had fulfilled my American dream.

I started at this company in 1998 as an equity trader, became the head of equity and commodity trading and, a couple of years before A.I.G.’s meltdown last September, was named the head of business development for commodities. Over this period the equity and commodity units were consistently profitable — in most years generating net profits of well over $100 million. Most recently, during the dismantling of A.I.G.-F.P., I was an integral player in the pending sale of its well-regarded commodity index business to UBS. As you know, business unit sales like this are crucial to A.I.G.’s effort to repay the American taxpayer.

The profitability of the businesses with which I was associated clearly supported my compensation. I never received any pay resulting from the credit default swaps that are now losing so much money. I did, however, like many others here, lose a significant portion of my life savings in the form of deferred compensation invested in the capital of A.I.G.-F.P. because of those losses. In this way I have personally suffered from this controversial activity — directly as well as indirectly with the rest of the taxpayers.

I have the utmost respect for the civic duty that you are now performing at A.I.G. You are as blameless for these credit default swap losses as I am. You answered your country’s call and you are taking a tremendous beating for it.

But you also are aware that most of the employees of your financial products unit had nothing to do with the large losses. And I am disappointed and frustrated over your lack of support for us. I and many others in the unit feel betrayed that you failed to stand up for us in the face of untrue and unfair accusations from certain members of Congress last Wednesday and from the press over our retention payments, and that you didn’t defend us against the baseless and reckless comments made by the attorneys general of New York and Connecticut.

My guess is that in October, when you learned of these retention contracts, you realized that the employees of the financial products unit needed some incentive to stay and that the contracts, being both ethical and useful, should be left to stand. That’s probably why A.I.G. management assured us on three occasions during that month that the company would “live up to its commitment” to honor the contract guarantees.

That may be why you decided to accelerate by three months more than a quarter of the amounts due under the contracts. That action signified to us your support, and was hardly something that one would do if he truly found the contracts “distasteful.”

That may also be why you authorized the balance of the payments on March 13.

At no time during the past six months that you have been leading A.I.G. did you ask us to revise, renegotiate or break these contracts — until several hours before your appearance last week before Congress.

I think your initial decision to honor the contracts was both ethical and financially astute, but it seems to have been politically unwise. It’s now apparent that you either misunderstood the agreements that you had made — tacit or otherwise — with the Federal Reserve, the Treasury, various members of Congress and Attorney General Andrew Cuomo of New York, or were not strong enough to withstand the shifting political winds.

You’ve now asked the current employees of A.I.G.-F.P. to repay these earnings. As you can imagine, there has been a tremendous amount of serious thought and heated discussion about how we should respond to this breach of trust.

As most of us have done nothing wrong, guilt is not a motivation to surrender our earnings. We have worked 12 long months under these contracts and now deserve to be paid as promised. None of us should be cheated of our payments any more than a plumber should be cheated after he has fixed the pipes but a careless electrician causes a fire that burns down the house.

Many of the employees have, in the past six months, turned down job offers from more stable employers, based on A.I.G.’s assurances that the contracts would be honored. They are now angry about having been misled by A.I.G.’s promises and are not inclined to return the money as a favor to you.

The only real motivation that anyone at A.I.G.-F.P. now has is fear. Mr. Cuomo has threatened to “name and shame,” and his counterpart in Connecticut, Richard Blumenthal, has made similar threats — even though attorneys general are supposed to stand for due process, to conduct trials in courts and not the press.

So what am I to do? There’s no easy answer. I know that because of hard work I have benefited more than most during the economic boom and have saved enough that my family is unlikely to suffer devastating losses during the current bust. Some might argue that members of my profession have been overpaid, and I wouldn’t disagree.

That is why I have decided to donate 100 percent of the effective after-tax proceeds of my retention payment directly to organizations that are helping people who are suffering from the global downturn. This is not a tax-deduction gimmick; I simply believe that I at least deserve to dictate how my earnings are spent, and do not want to see them disappear back into the obscurity of A.I.G.’s or the federal government’s budget. Our earnings have caused such a distraction for so many from the more pressing issues our country faces, and I would like to see my share of it benefit those truly in need.

On March 16 I received a payment from A.I.G. amounting to $742,006.40, after taxes. In light of the uncertainty over the ultimate taxation and legal status of this payment, the actual amount I donate may be less — in fact, it may end up being far less if the recent House bill raising the tax on the retention payments to 90 percent stands. Once all the money is donated, you will immediately receive a list of all recipients.

This choice is right for me. I wish others at A.I.G.-F.P. luck finding peace with their difficult decision, and only hope their judgment is not clouded by fear.

Mr. Liddy, I wish you success in your commitment to return the money extended by the American government, and luck with the continued unwinding of the company’s diverse businesses — especially those remaining credit default swaps. I’ll continue over the short term to help make sure no balls are dropped, but after what’s happened this past week I can’t remain much longer — there is too much bad blood. I’m not sure how you will greet my resignation, but at least Attorney General Blumenthal should be relieved that I’ll leave under my own power and will not need to be “shoved out the door.”

Sincerely,

Jake DeSantis
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Mike said:
Low Income folks=Good
High Income folks=Bad

What have we become? :roll:

Its what you get when you don't have moderation at all levels...8 years of listening to Bush say "let them eat cake" to the working man- and runaway greed and corruption with his total backing of the high incomes and elites created this backlash which was very evident at the polls in 06 and 08.....
 

Mike

Well-known member
Its what you get when you don't have moderation at all levels

When you have moderation, to any point you have a form of Communism. :roll: :mad:

I watched all you f--kin' trogladytes bitchin' about Exxon profits but you never said a word about how much tax they paid. :roll:

Those who go to the polls to vote Dem do not aspire to get a big salary..........All they want is another goverment tit........ :roll: :roll: :shock:
 

TexasBred

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
Mike said:
Low Income folks=Good
High Income folks=Bad

What have we become? :roll:

Its what you get when you don't have moderation at all levels...8 years of listening to Bush say "let them eat cake" to the working man- and runaway greed and corruption with his total backing of the high incomes and elites created this backlash which was very evident at the polls in 06 and 08.....

There you go off again OT....Bush tried to get those guys under control, but Dem. opposition killed any chance. Sorry you never had a chance to make more money than "deputy sheriff".
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
TexasBred said:
Oldtimer said:
Mike said:
Low Income folks=Good
High Income folks=Bad

What have we become? :roll:

Its what you get when you don't have moderation at all levels...8 years of listening to Bush say "let them eat cake" to the working man- and runaway greed and corruption with his total backing of the high incomes and elites created this backlash which was very evident at the polls in 06 and 08.....

There you go off again OT....Bush tried to get those guys under control, but Dem. opposition killed any chance. Sorry you never had a chance to make more money than "deputy sheriff".

And where would this country be if you had no "deputy sheriffs" or policemen or firemen or teachers or sewer workers or sh*t shoveling laborers or factory workers or small businessmen :???: :???: ...

Your comment just amplifies the current attitude taken by the elitist cult you bow down to..... :(
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
TexasBred said:
Oldtimer said:
Its what you get when you don't have moderation at all levels...8 years of listening to Bush say "let them eat cake" to the working man- and runaway greed and corruption with his total backing of the high incomes and elites created this backlash which was very evident at the polls in 06 and 08.....

There you go off again OT....Bush tried to get those guys under control, but Dem. opposition killed any chance. Sorry you never had a chance to make more money than "deputy sheriff".

And where would this country be if you had no "deputy sheriffs" or policemen or firemen or teachers or sewer workers or sh*t shoveling laborers or factory workers or small businessmen :???: :???: ...

Your comment just amplifies the current attitude taken by the elitist cult you bow down to..... :(

I didn't take the comment the way you did OT. I thought it was more about you having the opportunity to do what ever you wanted and you chose a profession that did not pay as much, but that you/others felt was honorable.

The main point of the letter written by the AIG exec. has been lost in this thread. It's more about how some within the company had nothing to do with this boondogle, and are getting punished by government, media and ACORN.

What amount of money was shipped off to foreign companys by AIG and the Government?
 

TexasBred

Well-known member
Oldtimer said:
TexasBred said:
Oldtimer said:
Its what you get when you don't have moderation at all levels...8 years of listening to Bush say "let them eat cake" to the working man- and runaway greed and corruption with his total backing of the high incomes and elites created this backlash which was very evident at the polls in 06 and 08.....

There you go off again OT....Bush tried to get those guys under control, but Dem. opposition killed any chance. Sorry you never had a chance to make more money than "deputy sheriff".

And where would this country be if you had no "deputy sheriffs" or policemen or firemen or teachers or sewer workers or sh*t shoveling laborers or factory workers or small businessmen :???: :???: ...

Your comment just amplifies the current attitude taken by the elitist cult you bow down to..... :(

Well for one thing we wouldn't have idiots in sheriff's dept. cars going 90 mph down the road with no lights flashing because all they're doing is rushing to the coffee shop or going home to check on a cow. And I bow down to no human.
 

hopalong

Well-known member
TexasBred said:
Oldtimer said:
TexasBred said:
There you go off again OT....Bush tried to get those guys under control, but Dem. opposition killed any chance. Sorry you never had a chance to make more money than "deputy sheriff".

And where would this country be if you had no "deputy sheriffs" or policemen or firemen or teachers or sewer workers or sh*t shoveling laborers or factory workers or small businessmen :???: :???: ...

Your comment just amplifies the current attitude taken by the elitist cult you bow down to..... :(

Well for one thing we wouldn't have idiots in sheriff's dept. cars going 90 mph down the road with no lights flashing because all they're doing is rushing to the coffee shop or going home to check on a cow. And I bow down to no human.

You forgot the one going 90 mph to get to the coffee shop to have another donut that he definitely does not need.Look at his picture, that is obvious!
Or his doing 90 mph to get someplace where he can post a BASH Bush post some place on one of the many forums he belongs to!

Get a life after Bush oldtimer your current one is kinda like you no longer worth anything!!!!!!!!!!
Oh VEY
eh????
 

jigs

Well-known member
I feel very let down. I popped on here thinking perhaps Obama resigned......

that would be the only GOOD thing he could do as a President.
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
obama-geithner-franknstn.jpg
 
Top