• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

HR 1913 (Hate Crimes re-introduced)

MoGal

Well-known member
The whole bill probably needs to be looked at


http://www.onenewsnow.com/Politics/Default.aspx?id=484080


Ever so quietly, 'hate crimes' legislation re-introduced
Charlie Butts - OneNewsNow - 4/11/2009

A Texas Republican is speaking out against "hate crimes" laws, arguing they could be used to intimidate and prosecute pastors to preach the full counsel of God.



Hate crimes laws -- recently re-introduced in Congress as H.R. 1913 -- could be used to attack Christians and pastors, just as has been done in Canada. Congressman Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) spoke about it on the House floor, saying the misunderstanding is on the part of homosexuals.

"Many people do not understand the Christian heart because they just don't like people that disagree with them," stated Gohmert. "Whereas the true Christian heart can disagree with people and love them, love them deeply, and be willing to give their lives for them."

The lawmaker went on to say that the proposal is an unfair law, and that an amendment to supposedly correct the injustice was defeated. Gohmert explained why.

"We are not going to protect religious speech because you can go after a minister who says relations outside of a marriage of a man and a woman [are] wrong," he suggested. "Someone goes out after hearing that, shoots somebody, and then [argues] 'The preacher told me it was wrong. That's what induced me to do that -- the sermons, the Bible teachings, what not.'"

And that, concluded Gohmert, is all authorities would need to seize a pastor's files, computers, copies of speeches, CDs, and DVDs to obtain evidence for prosecution. Similar prosecutions have occurred in Canada and Europe.

H.R. 1913, introduced by Representatives John Conyers (D-Michigan) and Mark Kirk (R-Illinois), carries the title "Local Law Enforcement Crimes Prevention Act."
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
Maybe a hate bill, that is done right, will stop the liberally biased profs and teachers from trying to indoctrinate their students.

That is if they haven't already been rounded up as "Left Wing Extremists"

Will this bill be directed towards all religions, or just those hate filled Christians? Surely it won't cover the Infidel loving "Peaceful Religion"
 

MoGal

Well-known member
and since we're looking at bills, make as well look at this one:

"Want To Have A Baby? Government will decide if you are mentally fit", World Net Daily, April 2, 2009
"A bill that would subject pregnant women to mental health screenings – and possibly medications that would follow any diagnosis of 'depression'– has returned and already is more than halfway through Congr ess, a concerned family group is warning. WND reported a year ago when the plan was proposed to allow the government to order tests on mothers for baby blues. The proposal later died. However, officials with United Nonprofits and Individuals for Truth and Ethics say the bill is back, and it already has been approved by the U.S. House and assigned to a Senate committee under the designation S.324."
Genuine Conservatives sighed a huge sigh of relief last year when this proposal died; however, the Congress at that time was far more Conservative than it is now, and the White House was in control of a quasi-conservative, George W. Bush. While Bush was not a true Conservative, he played more to their agenda than Obama ever will. We are seeing this draconian legislation quietly moving through Congress now because the new President is boldly Liberal and is willing to put the power of his office behind this proposal.
It is also problematic that this whole issue revolves around the very nebulous loophole called 'depression'. This broad analysis means that doctors can put their patients on the same kind of 'depression' medicine that the public shooters have been on -- like prozac and ritalin -- drugs which causes such a change in levels of consciousness that the victim is much worse off than before.
Consider these actual effects:
1) "... pharmaceutical sales manager who killed herself by jumping out of a window after receiving four cocktails of antidepressants, anti-anxiety and antipsychotic drugs and electroshock therapy following the birth of her child."
2) "2005: A 30-year-old Indiana mother taking anti-depressants ends up facing charges she murdered her two sons, ages 2 and 9."
3) "2001: Andrea Yates is accused of drowning five children, ages 6 months to 7 years in the family bathtub. She had been taking anti-depressants Effexor and Remeron."
4) "2004: Emiri Padron stabbed herself in the chest after smothering her baby daughter. Zoloft was found in her apartment."
Furthermore, as we have repeatedly reported, virtually every single public mass murder who shoots a bunch of people and then kills himself before authorities can arrest him are, or have been, on some anti-depressant medication; most instances revolve around either prozac or ritalin.
Now, let us return to the subject of the New Age plan to control births.
Government control over the numbers of mothers allowed to give birth to children is the key.
" 'What is being done currently, if you look under the hood and at the legislative history of the bill and all the front groups pushing it, is a movement towards universal mental health screening – including mandatory screening of women as they do in New Jersey – and preventive drugging during pregnancy or postpartum' ... the bill would impose 'a highly subjective questionnaire' on mothers about their moods, generating diagnoses that could include depression. 'These labels almost ALWAYS lead to an antidepressant drug prescription, and antidepressants are known to cause SERIOUS SIDE EFFECTS including suicide, homicide, and infant death', she wrote. "
The New Age Movement has been pushing for this legislation for decades now. They want governments worldwide to tightly control how many women get pregnant, which groups of women are allowed to get pregnant, and how many actual live births which will occur. Women belonging to dissident groups like Christianity will be so tightly controlled that the numbers of new babies born to Christian parents will likely dry up!
This proposal is serious, it is backed by the United Nations, and now apparently by Liberal Democrats in charge of both the Congress and the White House. While we can still protest, we need to email, call, and/or write our representatives protesting the "Melanie Blocker Stokes Mother's Act".
 
Top