• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

hypo and Sandy forgot to mention

Steve

Well-known member
Imagine how delusional you have to be if, in your world, Barack Obama is the second coming of Adolf Hitler and Orly Taitz is the equivalent of Nelson Mandela. Seriously, it's men in white

while I would never equate either of them, to hitler of Madala,.. . I have seen no evidence of Obamas' Natural born qualifications..

and plenty of evidence of his pushing a national socialist agenda..

does that make me crazy?
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
R2, you follow orly too much. You have tunnel vision

Barnett v. Obama: Important Discovery Is Available Now According To Judge Carter’s Order of Sept. 17, 2009.


While reading Judge Carter’s limited discovery order, the following passage caught my eye:

In this case, Defendants have alleged that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction for various reasons, including that the case presents a non-justiciable political question that is properly addressed by the legislative branch of government, not the judicial branch. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss at 11.

As you know, Judge Carter agreed to stay discovery until the motion to dismiss was resolved regarding whether the district court has subject matter jurisdiction.

With Judge Carter’s reasoning guiding my analysis, I carefully examined the DOJ motion to dismiss paying special attention to the arguments made starting on page 11. When I got to page 13, I found something interesting:

Under 3 U.S.C. § 15, Congress is directed to be in session on the appropriate date to count the electoral votes for President, with the President of the Senate presiding. The statute further directs that the electoral votes be counted, and then the results be presented to the President of the Senate, who shall then “announce the state of the vote.” The statute then provides a mechanism for objections to be registered and resolved in the following language:

“[e]very objection shall be made in writing,and shall state clearly and concisely, and without argument, the ground thereof, and shall be signed by at least one Senator and one Member of the House of Representatives before the same shall be received. When all objections so made . . . shall have been received and read, the Senate shall thereupon withdraw, and such objections shall be submitted to the Senate for its decision; and the Speaker of the House of Representatives shall, in like manner, submit such objections to the House of Representatives for its decision.”

That’s an interesting quote… interesting for what the DOJ left out.

They conveniently cut the statute off when they bring it into the brief. The uncensored passage from 3 U.S.C. § 15 states:

Upon such reading of any such certificate or paper, the President of the Senate shall call for objections, if any. Every objection shall be made in writing, and shall state clearly and concisely, and without argument, the ground thereof…

The DOJ clipped the statute so as to leave out the part which places a burden on the Vice President, acting in his role as President of the Senate, to call for objections after the count of votes.

Vice President Cheney failed to call for objections as the statute requires.

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/



New Hampshire Secretary of State Will Investigate Whether Obama’s Name Belonged On Ballots.

On Sept. 4, 2009 I published a blog entitled FACTCHECK.ORG CAPITULATES. In that report, I pointed out that Factcheck.org – while admitting my report accurately corrected their original statutory analysis as to President Obama’s Kenyan citizenship – erroneously stated I was a “former attorney”:


As of September 6, 2009 they have corrected their report to reflect that I am currently “a lawyer”, not a former lawyer:


The evidence comes from the August 23, 1894, issue of The Nation magazine which states:

In 1885, Secretary Bayard decided that ‘the son of a German subject, born in Ohio, was not a citizen under the statute or the Constitution, because “he was on his birth ’subject to a foreign power,’ and ‘not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States’ “.

Here we have an official US State Department ruling from 1885 that people born in the US of foreign parentage are subject to foreign powers and not considered US citizens.

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/
 

hypocritexposer

Well-known member
reader (the Second) said:
hypo honey, they can read for themselves that the case was thrown out as frivolous and the judge upbraided both Taitz and the M.D.

And a motion to sanction Taitz has been brought to the California bar for misconduct based on her unprofessional statements about the judge in the press the next day.

Funny how you and Sandy failed to mention the outcome of this case, isn't it? :wink:

you are talking about a different case.

Judge Carter is a different judge than the one you mentioned.

http://ranchers.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=412431&highlight=judge+carter#412431

the case you mentioned was only mentioned in passing, and it was never commented on by anybody.

although I did mention that it seemed to be put together awfully quickly.

the case Sandhusker and I were discussing is still scheduled for Oct 5, if it gets thrown out, be sure to let us know, won't you? You'll probably be on orly's site that day anyway.
 

hopalong

Well-known member
reader (the Second) said:
This thread has to do with the case heard two days ago that was thrown out.

I simply wanted people to know that you and Sandy are ignoring this case because it went badly (again) for the birthers and horribly for the M.D. who wants to wiggle out of being deployed to Iraq after receiving a free education and for Orly Taitz who may be disbarred in CA for her unprofessional behavior. She is a laughingstock at this point.

Why are you changing the subject? Why don't you want to acknowledge yet another defeat?

Why should he admit to a defeat, you sure as heck wont, and you lose more that he ever has!! :D

You change subjects faster than a NASCAR drive changes gears :D :D :D
 

Sandhusker

Well-known member
Why does Obama go to such lengths and expenes to keep his certificate hidden, Reader?

Why does Gibbs lie about the existence of the cert on the net?

Answer those questions and you've got something to say, otherwise....
 
Top