• If you are having problems logging in please use the Contact Us in the lower right hand corner of the forum page for assistance.

I am Chavez!

Whitewing

Well-known member
That's the saying here, it's even printed on their red t-shirts. That's what the gubmint wants the Chavistas to believe....that they are Chavez. As such, they can do Chavez's bidding and no one is going to control them.

When Chavez said, "being rich is bad", and, "it's okay to rob rich people if you're hungry", (yes, he actually said that), then what do you think happened?

Now, why do I bring this up? As I've mentioned, there are so many similiarities to what I see pols doing here to what the pols (particularly donks) are doing in the US.

Which brings me to these Rush comments about Herbert Meyer who was in the national security apparatus during the Reagan administration. These comments were linked on Drudge:

I also mentioned he wrote a piece that currently is in the American Thinker earlier this week, and it had the potential to be controversial because he used Adolf Hitler and Nazism in it, and it was his way of explaining, he made a point in the piece that nowhere, you know, people looking for a smoking gun to nail Obama on all these scandals, Herb says, "Ain't gonna be one."

He said whether you believe it or not, there is not one document linking Adolf Hitler to the holocaust. Adolf Hitler never put it on paper what he intended to do. There is no smoking gun. And yet what happened? We know that the Nazis engaged in the Holocaust. Herb Meyer's point was that the people Hitler hired didn't have to be told. They didn't have to be given instructions. All they had to do was listen to what Hitler was saying. All they had to do was listen to what his objectives were. And he said the same thing's happening here with this administration. He went to great pains to say: I'm not calling this administration a bunch of Nazis. I'm just using this as an illustration. I know people will get my point if I use something this notorious, the Nazi regime.

It's a point that I've made here about the IRS. They say, "Well, you can't link it in to Obama." You don't need to link Obama to it. He hired these people. Lois Lerner and everybody at the IRS who's doing this is doing everything they can to please Obama. There's not gonna be a smoking gun, but you don't need a smoking gun to know where this administration's doing what it's doing.

Obama puts people in positions that mirror him. Eric Holder, you name it, they're doing Obama's bidding. Everybody. Susan Rice and Samantha Power, they are Obama, and there's a context for what's happening. Herbert Meyer, if I may quote him again, asserted that essentially what's taking place in the United States right now is a coup, not a violent coup, and not a million artistic coup, but nevertheless a takeover of a government, and it's being done by the Obama administration.

He referred to it as a coup. I don't know if he used the word "peaceful," but clearly there's a coup d'etat going. You know it and I know it. This is what animates us. This is why the Tea Party exists. This country was founded on certain concepts, principles, beliefs -- and they're under assault. Chief among them under assault is the right to privacy, and that's what all this is about. So in the midst of this coup d'etat... I happen to like that formulation.
 

Mike

Well-known member
I recall a certain poster here complaining about Obama's appointments not getting confirmed and actually suggested they be automatically confirmed in a certain period of time if the Senate did not approve them quickly.

How stupid is that?

If Obama wants a fast appointment, all he has to do is nominate a person with a clean record that can get nominated fast..........................
 

Tam

Well-known member
Mike said:
I recall a certain poster here complaining about Obama's appointments not getting confirmed and actually suggested they be automatically confirmed in a certain period of time if the Senate did not approve them quickly.

How stupid is that?

If Obama wants a fast appointment, all he has to do is nominate a person with a clean record that can get nominated fast..........................

There is a problem with your idea Mike, I doubt Obama knows anyone with a clean record. He has appointed people that are loyal to him and to be loyal to him you have to be willing to LIE TO PROTECT HIM. How many people do you know that are willing to LIE at the drop of a hat have a clean record. :? He has to appoint people that have something to hide so he can keep control on their willingness to keep his secrets.
 
Top